This article analyses the results of a long-term study of the strategies of the Russian-speaking Buddhist community in relation to the Internet and new media. The authors present the results of a study of two cases of Buddhist digital innovators - communities of the Russian-speaking branch of the International Dzogchen Community and Russian Theravada. The authors chose these two cases for analysis, since they are representative for the sociological consideration of the multidimensional connections between online and offline communications of Russian digital Buddhism. The subject of the study seems to be especially relevant, since in modern sociology more and more attention is paid to the study of the influence of media technologies, the Internet and social media on religious traditions, practices and forms of social organisation of religion. The reason for this is the deepening process of mediatisation of modern societies. It has brought with it fundamental transformations of various spheres of social activity. Religions are involved in the process of mediatisation, that poses a number of serious questions that require new answers unknown to their traditions. Thus, the digitalisation of sacred texts brings with it the devaluation of the tradition of canonical knowledge and interpretation of sacred texts. In this complex context of reformatting social reality, Russian traditional religions are developing their own reflections and responses to the risks of mediatisation. On the Russian-language Internet, Orthodoxy, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism are represented by a rich variety of websites of the corresponding religious communities and centres of various trends, podcasts, channels, publics, groups and blogs on social networks. And, as the results of sociological research demonstrate, the discussion of the correlation of the value-normative coordinates of everyday life with religious-doctrinal regulation serves as the semantic core of trans-local religious communications mediated by media. New digital media challenge religious traditional values, since they provide space and ways of forming new religious authorities, new ways of influencing a certain religious group. The study was conducted using a methodology developed by the authors, combining methods of mathematical modelling and qualitative sociology. The authors conclude that, paradoxically, non-traditional Buddhist organisations in Russia have adopted an innovative strategy and have proven to be very creative in attracting new media and promoting their own presentations in the public space. And the directions of Buddhism that have been institutionalised in the past 30 years, on the contrary, are conservative.

Russian digital Buddhism, Buddhist digital innovators, media strategies, Russian Theravada, Hinayana, Mahayana

1. Aktamov I. G., Badmatsyrenov B., Tsyrempilov N. V. Russian Buddhism in the Internet Dimension. Vlast, 2015: 7: 125–130 (in Russ.). EDN: UDRSFV.
2. Grishaeva E,. Shumkova V. Middle-Range Theories in Religion and Media Studies: Mediation, Mediatization and RSST. Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2000: 38(2): 7–40 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/2073-7203-2020-38-2-7-40.
3. Оstrovskaya Е. А., Badmatsyrenov T. B. Russian Digital Buddhism: Strategies of Buddhist Communities in New Media. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2022: 7: 109–119 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250019277-7.
4. Anderson J. The Internet and Islam’s new interpreters. In Eickleman D. F. (ed.) New media in the Muslim world: The emerging public sphere. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1999: 213.
5. Buddhism, the Internet, and Digital Media The Pixel in the Lotus. Ed. by G. P. Grieve, D. Veidlinger. New York, Routledge, 2014: 240.
6. Campbell H. (ed.) Digital Judaism: Jewish Negotiations with Digital Media and Culture. New York, Routledge, 2015: 222.
7. Campbell H. Framing the Human-Technology Relationship: How Religious Digital Creatives Engage Posthuman Narratives. Social Compass, 2016: 63(3): 302–318. DOI: 10.1177/0037768616652328.
8. Campbell H. Introduction: The rise of the study of digital religion. In Digital Religion. Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. Ed. by H A. Campbell. New York, Routledge, 2012: 276.
9. Campbell H. When Religion Meets Media. London, Routledge, 2010: 232.
10. Campbell H., Bellar W. Digital Religion: The Basics. New York, Routledge, 2022: 178.
11. Campbell H., Tsuria R. (eds) Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media. London, Routledge, 2022: 308.
12. Cheong P., Huang S., Poon J. Cultivating Online and Offline Pathways to Enlightenment. Religious authority and strategic arbitration in wired Buddhist organization. Information, Communication & Society, 2011: 14(8): 1160–1180. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.579139.
13. Connely L. Virtual Buddhism: Online Communities, Sacred Place and Objects. In The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics. New York, Springer, 2015: 3926.
14. Couldry N., Hepp A. The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge, UK, Polity Press, 2017: 290.
15. Grieve G. P. The Middle Way Method: A Buddhist-Informed Ethnography of the Virtual World of Second Life. In Buddhism, the Internet, and Digital Media: the Pixel in the Lotus. Ed, by G. P. Grieve, D. Veidlinger. New York, Routledge, 2015: 232.
16. Grieve G. P. Cyber Zen: Imagining Authentic Buddhist Identity, Community, and Practices in the Virtual World of Second Life. London, Routledge, 2016: 278.
17. Grieve G. P., Veidlinger D. Buddhist Media Technologies. In The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Buddhism. Ed. by. M. Jerryson. New York, Oxford University Press, 2016: 469.
18. Kim M. C. Online Buddhist community: An alternative organization in the information age. In Hojsgaard M., Warburg M. (eds) Religion and cyberspace. London, Routledge, 2005: 224.
19. Krotz F. Mediatization. A concept with which to grasp media and societal change. In Lundby K. (ed.). Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences. New York, NY, Peter Lang, 2009: 317.
20. Lee J. Cultivating the Self in Cyberspace: The Use of Personal Blogs among Buddhist Priests. Journal of Media and Religion, 2009: 8(2): 97–114.
21. Lövheim M., Axner M. Mediatized religion and public spheres: Current approaches and new questions. In Granholm K., Moberg M., Sjö S. (eds) Religion, Media, and Social Change. London, Routledge, 2015: 224.
22. Ostrovskaya E., Badmatsyrenov T. et al. Russian-Speaking Digital Buddhism: Neither Cyber, nor Sangha. Religions, 2021: 12(6): 449. DOI: 10.3390/rel12060449.
23. Ostrowski A. American Cybersangha: Building a Community or Providing a Buddhist Bulletin Board? In Buddhism, the Internet, and Digital Media: the Pixel in the Lotus. Ed. by G. P. Grieve, D. Veidlinger. New York, Routledge, 2015: 232.
24. Prebish Ch. S. The Cybersangha: Buddhism on the Internet. In Religion online: Finding Faith on the Internet. Ed. by L. L. Dawson, D. E. Cowan. New York, London, Routledge, 2004: 288.
25. Radde-Antweiler K., Zeiler X. Mediatized Religion in Asia: Studies on Digital Media and Religion. London, Routledge. 2019: 248.
26. Schlutter M. Buddhism in the Digital World. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to East and Inner Asian Buddhism. Ed. by M. Poceski. Wiley Blackwell, 2014: 552.
27. Veidlinger D. Introduction. In Buddhism, the Internet, and Digital Media: the Pixel in the Lotus. Ed. by G. P. Grieve, D. Veidlinger. New York, Routledge. 2015: 232.