Research ArticleRaisa E. Barash Candidate of Political Science Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia raisabarash@gmail.comORCID ID=0000-0002-5899-973XRoman V. Petukhov Candidate of Law Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia petukhovrv@yandex.ruORCID ID=0000-0003-0940-9315Identity and historical memory of Russians in the context of confrontation with the "collective West". Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2023. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 147-175The research was carried out at the expense of the Fund of the Expert Institute for Social Research (EISR) "FMUS-2023-0023 Identity and historical memory of Russians in the conditions of confrontation with the collective West" at the Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Дата поступления статьи: 10.09.2023Topic: Contradictions and consolidation in Russian societyFor citation: Barash R. E., Petukhov R. V. Identity and historical memory of Russians in the context of confrontation with the "collective West". Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2023. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 147-175DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2023.14.4.9. EDN: OEMWVCТекст статьиAbstractBasing on the data of long-term sociological research, the authors study the influence of the construct “collective West” on the civic identity and historical memory of modern Russian society and investigate the dynamics of these attitudes of public society under the influence of the international political situation. “Collective West” is considered as a stereotypical construct founded on Russian public opinion and political discourse. The authors identify three main approaches to the description of the “collective West”: socio-economic and political approaches, as well as the strategy of studying the organisation of private life. This allows us to correlate the features attributed to the discursively constructed “Other” with the ideas about the “collective West” actualized in the mass consciousness of modern Russians. The authors summarize that the Russian collective identity combines both traditional-self, Russian, and Western-liberal values. But Russians are unambiguous when it comes to the interpretation of historical memory: they acutely perceive the discrepancy between Russian and Western interpretations of the past. The “collective West” has acted for Russia not only as a traditional socio-cultural and civilizational “Other”, but also as geopolitical competitor. Hence this is the peculiarity of interpretations of past events and historical memory in Russia and abroad. The “perestroika inertia” of attempts to reconcile different versions of the past was replaced in the 2000s by a sharp anti-communist discourse of a number of Eastern European states, their “turn” to the West and Russia’s growing external isolation. This revitalized the conflict between the national historical narratives of Russia and Western countries, and this is very painful for Russian society today. Negative interpretation of the events of Soviet history, especially of the memory of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War, is absolutely unacceptable for the Russian historical memory. Russian people react to the attempts to revise the traditional interpretations of Russian history with the demand for reliable historical knowledge. People attitude to preserve the established interpretation of national history is related not to the fear of decentralization tendencies, as it was in the 1990s, but to their desire to protect the history of their families and family memory.Keywordsidentity, historical memory, past, history, WestReferences Anderson B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Transl. from Eng. by V. Nikolaev. Moscow, Kanon-Press-C: Kuchkovo Pole, 2001: 286 (in Russ.). Babaev K. V. Global Civilizational Conflict of the 21st Century and the Role of Russia. Problemy nacionalnoj strategii, 2022: 6(75): 36–47 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.52311/2079-3359_2022_6_36. Balatsky E. V. Russia in the Epicenter of Geopolitical Turbulence: Accumulation of Global Contradictions. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial'nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz, 2022: 15(4): 42–59 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.4.82.3. Balashova L. V. The Ideologeme of the “Collective West” Through the Prism of Anthropomorphic Metaphor. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 2022: 5 (95): 24–39 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.26170/1999-2629_2022_05_02. Barash R. E. Figura “Drugogo” kak znachimaya sostavlyayushchaya rossijskoj/russkoj identichnosti [The Figure of the “Other” as a Significant Component of Russia’s/Russian identity]. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i socialny`e peremeny, 2012: 1(107): 90–99 (in Russ.). Barash R. E., Antonovsky A. Y. A Study of Social Movements From the Systemic Communication Standpoint: is a Scientific Theory of Political Protest Possible? Filosofskiy zhurnal, 2018: 11 (2): 91–105 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2018-11-2-91-105. Berger P., Lukman T. Social Construction of Reality. Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. Transl. from Eng. by E. Rutkevich. Moscow, Medium. Academia-Centr, 1995: 323 (in Russ.). Bobrov A. K. The Conceptual Foundations of the Foreign Policy of Russia. (in Russ.). Moscow, Aspect-Press, 2021: 221 (in Russ.). Brodovskaya E. V., Sklyarova N. Yu., Ognev A. S. Critics of the Concept of Future-Shock in the Context of the Sovereignization of the National Education and Upbringing System. Chelovecheskiy kapital, 2023: 10(178): 118–127 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25629/HC.2023.10.11. Gadzhiev K. S. Nacional’naya identichnost’: konceptual’nyj aspect [National Identity: Conceptual Aspect]. Voprosy filosofii, 2011: 10: 3–16 (in Russ.). Gorshkov M. K. Russian Society as it is: Experience of Sociological Diagnostics. In 2 Vol. Vol. 1. Moscow, Novyj Hronograf, 2016: 416 (in Russ.). Zhuravleva S. M., Ivanov A. V. Eurasian Civilizational Identity as the Ideological Basis of the New Unification of Eurasia. Vestnik Moskovskogo un-ta. Ser. 12: Politicheskie nauki, 2016: 1: 7–20 (in Russ.). Inglkhart R. Cultural evolution: how human motivations change and how it changes the world. Transl. from Eng. S. Lopatina. Moscow, Mysl’, 2018: 347 (in Russ.). Historical Consciousness of Russians: Assessments of the Past, Memory, Symbols (Experience of Sociological Measurement). Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. Moscow, Ves’ Mir, 2022: 248 (in Russ.). Kalinin I. Boi za istoriyu: proshloe kak ogranichennyj resurs [Fights for History: the Past as a Limited Resource]. Neprikosnovennyj zapas. Debaty o politike i kul’ture, 2011: 4(78): 330–339 (in Russ.). Kalinin I. A. Proshloe kak ogranichennyj resurs: istoricheskaya politika i ekonomika renty [The past as a Limited Resource: Historical Politics and the Economics of Rent]. Neprikosnovennyj zapas. Debaty o politike i kul’ture, 2013: 2(88): 200–214 (in Russ.). Karabuschenko P. L. «Rabbit holes» of the Carnival Political Culture of the Elites of the Modern Collective West. Kaspijskij region: politika, ekonomika, kul’tura, 2021: 2(67): 109–116 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21672/1818-510X-2021-67-2-109-116. Karpovich O. G., Zakaurtseva T. A. Russia and the “Collective West” in the Contours of the Emerging Multipolar World. Vestnik Rossijskoj nacii, 2017: 5(57): 180–191 (in Russ.). Kasyanov G. V. Ukraine and its Neighbors: the Historical Politics. 1987–2018. Moscow, NLO, 2019: 632 (in Russ.). Kupryushin A. P. Democracy of the “Collective West” as the Basis of Corruption. Vestnik VIESU, 2022: 4: 50–55 (in Russ.). Lipman U. Public opinion. Transl. from Eng. T. Barchukova. Moscow, In-t FOM, 2004: 384 (in Russ.). Litvin A. Nemets-Vrag: predislovie k publikacii dokumentov [German-Enemy: preface to the publication of documents]. Ab Imperio, 2001: 4: 229–242 (in Russ.). Magun V. S., Rudnev M. G. Beyond the “Soviet Man”: Russians in the European Value Typology. Dismantling Communism. Thirty years later. Ed. K. Yu. Rogov. Moscow, NLO, 2021: 325–353 (in Russ.). Malinova O. Y. Diskurs o ovayai “Zapade” v 1920-1930-h godah: popytki preodoleniya kollektivnoj identichnosti v novoj sisteme koordinat [Discourse about Russia and the “West” in the 1920-1930s: Attempts to Overcome Collective Identity in a New Coordinate System]. Cosmopolis, 2008: 2: 32–53 (in Russ.). Malinova O. Y. Rossiya i “Zapad” v XX veke: transformaciya diskursa o kollektivnoj identichnosti.Moscow [Russia and the “West” in the 20th century: transformation of the discourse on collective identity]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2009: 189 (in Russ.). Martynov B. F. “West” and “Non-West”: Past, Present… Future?. Moscow, ILA RAN, 2015: 172 (in Russ.). Mishuchkov A. A. Traditional Values in a Globalizing World. Vestnik OrenGU, 2015: 3(178): 65–71 (in Russ.). Morozov V. E. Zapad bez kavychek [West without quotes]. Svobodnaya mysl’, 2009: 11(1606): 47–60 (in Russ.). Morozov V. E. Rossiya i Drugie: Identichnost’ i Granicy Politicheskogo Soobshchestva [Russia and Others: Identity and Boundaries of Political Community], Moscow, NLO, 2009: 651 (in Russ.). Morozov I. L. Futurological Concepts of Francis Fukuyama and Alvin Toffler as an Ideological Justification for Western Civilizational Expansionism. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, parvo, 2022: 6(107): 18–23 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24158/pep.2022.6.2. Muravykh A. I., Nikitenko E. G. The Agony of the Collective West. Voprosy politologii, 2022: 4(80): 1181–1189 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.35775/PSI.2022.80.4.022. Neumann I. Using the “Other”: Images of the East in the formation of European identities. Transl. from Eng. V. Litvinov, I. Pilschikov. Moscow, Novoe Izd-vo, 2004: 336 (in Russ.). Rossiya i Zapad: Formirovaniye vneshnepoliticheskikh stereotipov v soznanii rossiyskogo obshchestva pervoy poloviny XX v. [Russia and the West: Formation of foreign policy stereotypes in the consciousness of Russian society in the first half of the 20th century]/ Coll. Monograph; ed. Golubev A. V. Moscow, IRI RAN, 1998: 334 (in Russ.). Semenenko I. S., Lapkin V. V., Pantin V. I. Identity in the Coordinate System of World Development [Identichnost’ v sisteme koordinat mirovogo razvitiya]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2010: 3: 40–59 (in Russ.). Senyavskaya E. S. Opponents of Russia in the wars of the twentieth century: The evolution of the “image of the enemy” in the consciousness of the army and society [Protivniki Rossii v vojnah dvadtsatogo veka: Evolyuciya “obraza vraga” v soznanii armii i obshchestva], Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2006: 288 (in Russ.). Timofeev I. N. Russia and the collective West: the new normal: workbook. Moscow, NP RSMD, 2016: 36 (in Russ.). Feofanov K. A. Trends in International Development in a Pandemic. Social’no-gumanitarnye znaniya, 2020: 6: 7–21 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.34823/SGZ.2020.5.51474. Foucault M. Archeology of knowledge. Transl. from Fr. M. Rakova, U. Serebryannikova. St. Petersburg, Gumanit. akademiya, 2004: 416 (in Russ.). Khudoley K. K. Russia and the West: the second “cold” or the first “cool”? Rossiya v globalnoj politike, 2020: 18: 6(106): 10–22 (in Russ.). Chudinov A. P. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political linguistics], Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2006: 256 (in Russ.). Schmitt K. Ponyatie politicheskogo [The Concept of the Political]. Voprosy sociologii, 1992: 1: 1: 35–67 (in Russ.). Miller A. I. The Turns of Russian Historical Politics, from Perestroika to 2011. In Miller A. I., Lipman M. A. (eds) The Convolutions of Historical Politics. CEU Press, 2012: 7–32. Neumann I. В. Russia and the Idea of Europe. A Study in Identity and International Relations. London-New York: Routledge, 1996: 272. Content Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2023. Vol. 14. No. 4