In recent years, the idea of a universal basic income (UBI) has begun to be widely discussed as a way to reform the social security system. For the effective implementation of this system, a high level of public consent is required, since it will affect all social groups. According to the Russian Social Survey (RSI) under the ESS programme, support for UBI among the Russian population is one of the highest in Europe. Most of all, UBI is supported by young people. Based on the tenth wave of RSI, hypotheses about the grounds for the formation of attitudes towards UBI among Russian youth were tested - the utilitarian-pragmatic theory of interests, the value theory and the “level of opinion formation” hypothesis. Significant differences were found in attitudes towards UBI between gender groups, people with different levels of education, economic status, different family structure, experience of unemployment and work-life balance. Among the value factors, support for measures to reduce economic inequality and the value of independence showed the strongest relationship with a UBI. However, in general, the first two hypotheses cannot convincingly explain the phenomenon of support for UBI among young people. The results of cognitive interviews conducted as part of the CESSI-Monitor national survey showed that the opinion about UBI among young people in Russia is still poorly formed. The majority of respondents gleaned basic information about UBI from the very name of the concept during the interview. Positive opinion about UBI arose due to the idea of ​​guaranteed additional income mentioned in the name. Such aspects as unconditionality and universality either have not yet found understanding or are perceived contradictory. Those who view a UBI as a system of equitable distribution of natural resource rents and national wealth have a positive attitude towards the idea of universality and equality in the distribution of such income. Those who emphasise the fact that UBI is funded by taxpayers perceive the idea of inclusiveness and equality without regard to merit and need negatively. In general, low awareness of UBI and poorly formed opinions lead to its instability. New arguments and clarifications can significantly change the picture. Therefore, it is still premature to talk about deep support for the UBI idea among Russian youth.

unconditional basic income, social security system, social justice, welfare state, social policy, youth, public opinion, cross-country comparisons

1. Andreenkov V. G. Metodologicheskie problemy i resheniya v sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh sravnitel’nykh issledovaniyakh [Methodological issues and solutions in contemproraly international research in Russia in Europe]. Ed. by A. V. Andreenkova L. A. Belyaeva. Moscow, Academia, 2009: 13–46 (in Russ.). EDN: DFTWPX.
2. Andreenkova A. V. In Search of Fair Social Welfare System — Dynamic of Attitudes Toward Universal Basic Income in Russian Society. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 2022: 28: 3: 38–56 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2022.28.3.9150; EDN: CNAGAQ.
3. Andreenkova A. V. A comparative analysis of popular attitudes toward the idea of universal basic income in Russia vs Europe. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2020: 1: 18–30 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008321-6.
4. Bobkov V. N., Zolotov А. V., Odintsova Е. V. Transition forms of universal basic income as a real prospect for Russia. Ekonomicheskie i socialnye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, pronoz, 2021: 14: 4: 33–47 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.4.76.2.
5. Bobkov V. N., Antipov V. I., Kolmakov I. B., Pavlova V. V. Transitional Forms of Universal Basic Income and Options of Testing Tools in Russia, Illustrated by Unemployed. Vestnik REU im. G. V. Plekhanova, 2020: 17: 5: 69–84 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21686/2413-2829-2020-5-69-84.
6. Bobkov V. N., Odintsova E. V., Chernykh E. A. Impact of Universal Basic Income on Employment According to Russian Experts. Ekonomika regiona, 2022: 18: 1: 159–174 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/ekon. reg.2022-1-12.
7. van Parijs P., Vanderborght Y. Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Moscow, VSHE, 2020: 440 (in Russ.).
8. Gontmakher E. S. Basic income: a prologue to social policy of the XXI century? Ekonomicheskaya politika, 2019: 2: 156–177 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2019-2-156-177.
9. Davydov D. Unconditional income: from “left” expectations to “right” inclinations”. Svobodnaya mysl, 2016: 2: 15–26 (in Russ.).
10. Lapin N. I. Formation of social state — the method of successful evaluation of the society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2018: 8: 3–11 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250000758-6.
11. Universal Basic Income: Is It a Chance for Russia? Ed. by V. N. Bobkov, E. V. Odintsova. Izhevsk, Shelest, 2022: 360 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21686/978-5-6048876-5-3-2022.
12. Chernykh E. A. Unconditional Basic Income: Public Opinion Attitude and Financial and Economic Aspects of Implementation. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2019: 15: 4: 70–84 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/1999-9836-2019-10083.
13. Cardone P. E. Public opinion towards a universal basic income in Europe. The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS, 2021: 75(4): 97–107: October-D.
14. Chrisp J., Pulkka V. V., Rincón L. M. Snowballing or wilting? What affects public support for varying models of basic income? Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 2020: 36(3): 223–236.
15. Chrisp J., Martinelli L. Neither left nor right. In The Palgrave international handbook of basic income. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019: 477–492.
16. de Wispelaere J., Stirton L. The many faces of universal basic Income. The Political Quarterly, 2004: 75: 3: 266–274.
17. ESS Round 8: European Social Survey. ESS-8 2016 Documentation Report. Edition 2.2. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Sikt – Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, Norway for ESS ERIC, 2020. DOI: 10.21338/NSD-ESS8-2016.
18. Herke B., Vicsek L. The attitudes of young citizens in higher education towards universal basic income in the context of automation—A qualitative study. International Journal of Social Welfare, 2022: 1–13. DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12533.
19. Kozák M. Cultural productivism and public support for the universal basic income from a cross-national perspective. European Societies, 2021: 23:1: 23–45. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1758741.
20. Roosma F., van Oorschot W. Public opinion on basic income: Mapping European support for a radical alternative for welfare provision. Journal of European Social Policy, 2020: 30(2): 190–205. DOI: 10.1177/0958928719882827.
21. OECD. Basic income as a policy option: Can it add up? Policy brief on the future of work. Paris: OECD, 2017.
22. Rossetti F., Roosma F., Laenen T., Abts K. An unconditional basic income? How Dutch citizens justify their opinions about a basic income and work conditionality. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 2020: 36(3): 284–300. DOI: 10.1017/ics.2020.15.
23. Stadelmann-Steffen I., Dermont C. Citizens' opinions about basic income proposals compared – A conjoint analysis of Finland and Switzerland. Journal of Social Policy, 2020: 49(2): 383–403.
24. Svallfors S. Contested Welfare States: Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond. Standford University Press, 2012.
25. Yang J., Mohan G., Fukushi K. An Analysis of the Factors Influencing Public Attitudes toward Implementing Basic Income (BI) from an Individual Perspective: A Case Study of Hokuriku Region, Japan. Societies, 2020: 10: 52. DOI: 10.3390/soc10030052.