Research ArticleSergey A. Kravtchenko Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Sociology, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Sociol7@yandex.ruORCID ID=0000-0003-2528-5703The sociological “arrow of time” in the XXI century: innovations in materials from Global sociology conventions. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 84-104This Article is downloaded: 309 times Topic: To the methodology of scientific researchFor citation: Kravtchenko S. A. The sociological “arrow of time” in the XXI century: innovations in materials from Global sociology conventions. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 84-104DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2018.27.4.540Текст статьиAbstractThis article analyzes the tendencies for the development and complication of sociological knowledge within the context of the effects of the sociological “arrow of time”. With this in mind, theoretical innovations provided by materials from the XV-XIX Global sociological conventions are put to use. Each worldwide sociology forum stimulated the expansion and complication of sociology: there is an ongoing “rediscovery” of social reality occuring, which in itself indicates the relevance of sociological knowledge. The XV convention (Brisbane) stimulated the development of sociology by way of increasing various theoretical-methodological approaches towards studying society, which implies the integration and widespread use of achievements by other social and physical sciences. The XVI convention (Durban) was marked by an internationalizing of sociology, which was reflected in the latter attaining its polycentricity. The XVII convention (Gothenburg) defined the fact that transformation of sociological knowledge became dependent not necessarily on an accelerating, but rather on an ever more complicated dynamic inherent to society. The XVIII convention (Yokohama) highlighted the emergence of new social and cultural inequalities, which occurred due to certain side effects of the development of current global realities. The XIX convention (Toronto) accentuated the analysis of the side effects which occur due to human activity, which basically change the socio-cultural nature of power, violence and justice. Special attention was devoted to the fact that today the sociological “arrow of time” is aimed towards studying the involuntary consequences of the digitalization of society, scientific knowledge, as well as the rise of digital technology. Unprecedented issues have emerged, which have to do with power being concentrated in the hands of a few global IT companies. The newfound realities of a digital society radically change the relationship between people and digital machines: an individual’s socialization and reasoning become subjugated to the function of “smart” machines. However, most importantly, fundamentally new power structures are emerging, which are determined by the digital realm and represent a formidable force in economical and geopolitical conflicts, as well as control individual bodies and social relations. Sociologists see a path to overcome the recent challenges faced by modern civilization in a transition towards interdisciplinary knowledge with a cultural backbone. This requires a humanistic shift in the development of all sciences.Keywordssociological "arrow of time", world congresses of sociology, side-effects, knowledge, digitalization of society, metamorphosis, interdisciplinarity, humanistic turn.ReferencesBeck U. Risk Society Revisited: Theory, Politics and Research Programms. The Risk Society and Beyond. Ed. by B. Adam, U. Beck, J. van Loon. London, Sage publ., 2007. 231 р. Beck U. The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2016. 223 p. Beck U. World at Risk. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2010. 240 p. Burawoy M. Welcome address by the President of the International Sociological Association. XVIII ISA World Congress of Sociology papers. Yokohama (Japan), 2014, pp. 9–11. Castells M. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 1: The Rise of the Network Society. Second edition. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 656 p. Deranger E. T. Indigenous Peoples, climate change, and climate justice in the Canadian context. XXI ISA World Congress of Sociology papers. Toronto, 2018, pp. 89–96. Fuller S. The New Sociological Imagination. London, SAGE publ., 2008. 231 p. Gumanisticheskiy povorot: imperativ chelovecheskoy civilizacii [Humanistic turn: the imperative of human civilization]. Ed. by S. A. Kravchenko. Moscow, MSIIR publ., 2018. 209 p. (in Russ.). Han Sang-Jin. Individual sovereignty, confucian challenge and human rights community: Why do we need a new sociological imagination. Book of Abstracts of XVII ISA World Congress of Sociology. Gotheborg (Sweden), ProQuest, 2010, p. 191. Hasegawa K. Welcome from the Chair of the Japanese Local Organizing Committee. XVIII ISA World Congress of Sociology papers. Yokohama (Japan), 2014, p. 17. Kravchenko S. A. Dinamika sociologicheskogo myshleniya i voobrazheniya [The dynamics of sociological thinking and imagination]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 2009, no 8, pp. 14–24 (in Russ.). Kravchenko S. A. K itogam VIII Konferencii Evropeyskoy sociologicheskoy associacii: teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie novacii [To the results of the VIII Conference of the European Sociological Association: theoretical and methodological innovations]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 2008, no 2, pp. 3–9 (in Russ.). Kravchenko S. A. Metamorfozy: sushchnost', uslozhniayushchiesia tipy, mesto v sociologicheskom znanii [Metamorphosis: essence, complicated types, place in sociological knowledge]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2017, no 10, pp. 3–14 (in Russ.). Kravchenko S. A. Mosty, soediniayushchie vsevozmozhnye raskoly sociologii radi bolee ravnogo mira [Bridges connecting all sorts of splits of sociology for the sake of a more equal world]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2015, no 2, pp. 29–38 (in Russ.). Kravchenko S. A. Novye riski edy: neobhodimost' gumanisticheskoy biopolitiki [New food risks: the need for a humanistic biopolitics]. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2014, no. 5, pp. 139–152 (in Russ.). Kravchenko S. A. Pereotkrytie social'noy real'nosti kak pokazatel' validnosti sotsiologicheskogo znaniya [Rediscovery of social reality as an indicator of the validity of sociological knowledge]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2014, no 5, pp. 27–37 (in Russ.). Kravchenko S. A. Sosushchestvovanie riskofobii i riskofilii – proyavlenie «normal'noy anomii» [The coexistence of riskophobia and riskophilia – an e[pression of “normal anomie”]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2017, no 2, pp. 3–13 (in Russ.). Kravchenko S. A. Sotsiologiya v dvizhenii k vzaimodejstviyu teoretiko-metodologicheskih podhodov [Sociology in the movement to the interaction of theoretical and methodological approaches]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2011, no 1, pp. 11–18 (in Russ.). Kravchenko S. A. Strela vremeni: sovremennye vyzovy sociologicheskomu znaniyu [The arrow of time: modern challenges to sociological knowledge]. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial'naya praktika, 2014, no 1, pp. 110–124 (in Russ.). Kravchenko S. A., Perova A. E. «Noviy katastrofizm» i budushchee: vostrebovannost' nelineynogo znaniya ["New catastrophism" and the future: the demand for non-linear knowledge]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya, 2017, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 449–459 (in Russ.). Marx K. Kapital [Das Kapital]. Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya, Second edition. Vol. 1. Moscow, Politizdat, 1960. 908 p. (in Russ.). Mosco V. Becoming Digital. Toward a Post-Internet Society. Bingley, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2017. 227 p. Perrow Ch. The Next Catastrophe: Reducing our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial and Terrorist Disasters. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2011. 432 p. Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poriadok iz khaosa. Noviy dialog cheloveka s prirodoy [Order from chaos. New dialogue of human being with nature]. Moscow, 2000. 312 p. (in Russ.). Sosa R. Welcome from ISA Vice-President for the Congress Program. XVIII ISA World Congress of Sociology papers. Yokohama (Japan), 2014, p. 12. Toshchenko Zh. T. Fantomy rossiyskogo obshchestva [Phantoms of the Russian society]. Moscow, Centr sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya i marketinga, 2015. 668 p. (in Russ.). Toshchenko Zh. T. Kentavr-problema (Opyt filosofskogo i sotsiologicheskogo analiza) [Centaur-problem (Experience of philosophical and sociological analysis)].Moscow, Noviy Khronograf, 2011. 552 p. (in Russ.). Toshchenko Zh. T. Sociologiya truda [Sociology of Labor]. Moscow, Yuniti-Dana, 2008. 423 p. (in Russ.). Toshchenko Zh. T. Sotsiologiya truda: opyt novogo prochteniya [Sociology of Labour: the new experience of reading]. Moscow, Mysl', 2005. 333 p. (in Russ.). Toshchenko Zh. T. Sotsiologiya zhizni [Sociology of Life]. Moscow, Yuniti-Dana, 2016. 399 p. (in Russ.). Vanderburg W. H. Our Battle for the Human Spirit. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2016. 421 p. Vanderburg W. H. Our War on Ourselves. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2011. 400 p. Wieviorka M. Welcome address by the President of the International Sociological Association. The Program of XVII World Congress of Sociology. Göteborg (Sweden), 2010, p. 15. Yanitsky O. N. Globalizaciya. Gorod. Chelovek [Globalization. City. Human being]. Moscow, FCTAS RAS publ., 2018. 177 p. (in Russ.).Content Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 4