The article provides an overview of contemporary research on neocolonialism. The work examines the history of the term "neocolonialism", as well as the main features of neocolonialism in the 21st century, including: the transformation of the nature, forms and methods of colonial influence, and changes in its scale. The main reasons for the interest in the problems of neocolonial studies are outlined, including a general change in research optics, the emergence of new forms of colonial dependence, etc. The prerequisites for the emergence of neocolonial studies in sociological science are indicated. The analysis of foreign studies demonstrates, on the one hand, the preservation of interest in traditional topics related to the colonial legacy in African countries, since they are still in the most vulnerable position compared to other former colonies, and on the other hand, an exit to a broader topic related to cultural neocolonialism in the context of globalisation, as well as the transformation of technology into an instrument of colonial influence. Modern domestic studies of neocolonialism have their own specifics, expressed, firstly, in the dominance of the economic interpretation of neocolonialism, secondly, they are often devoted to the study of the relationship between neocolonialism and globalisation and capitalism, thirdly, in the works of domestic authors special attention is paid to the position of Russia in the system of global neocolonialism. Based on the analysis of scientific discourse, the authors developed a typology of neocolonialism forms, that divides all forms into two large groups - traditional and new. Traditional forms include, first of all, economic and political neocolonialism. New forms include cultural and educational neocolonialism. The intensification of the digitalisation process and the increase in environmental risks at the beginning of the 21st century allow us to say that such forms of neocolonialism as environmental and digital are becoming increasingly important. Particular attention in the article is paid to environmental neocolonialism as a new, special form. The reasons for the growing interest in it and its impact on the political and economic spheres are also considered. The thesis of turning the green agenda into a new form of ideology, with the help of which the G7 countries implement policies that are beneficial to them, is discussed. The authors conclude that it is necessary to identify specific interests and values behind modern environmental initiatives.

neocolonialism, post-colonialism, globalization, environmental neocolonialism, environmental inequality

1. Alpidovskaya M. L. The problem of aggravation of uneven socio-economic development of countries in modern conditions. Teoreticheskaya ekonomika, 2014: 4(22): 46–50 (in Russ.). EDN: OXLWDB.
2. Bagomedov M. A., Rabadanova A. A. The structural policy of the state in the regions of the North Caucasus Federal District in the context of geo-economic challenges. Regionalnyye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki, 2017: 12(86): 59–68 (in Russ.). EDN: YXCQXA.
3. Beck U. What Is Globalization? Transl. from Germ. by A. Grigoriev et al. Мoscow, Progress-Traditsiya, 2001: 304 (in Russ.).
4. Bokeriya S. A., Davidchuk A. S., Degterev D. A. (et al.). Soviet Studies of Neocolonialism. Vestnik RUDN. Ser.: Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 2022: 22(4): 671–687 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-671-687; EDN: GYGFFS.
5. Gorelov A. A. From the world colonial system to global neocolonialism. Vek globalizatsii, 2014: 2(14): 52–64 (in Russ.). EDN: SXDHNF.
6. Gorelov A. A. Global Neocolonialism in Action: The West's War against Russia and the World. Moscow, Letniy sad, 2016: 360 (in Russ.).
7. Gorelov A. A., Bronnikov I. A. Global neocolonialism and the problem of sovereignty. Vlast′, 2015: 2: 19–25 (in Russ.). EDN: TNTVMF.
8. Gorelov A. A., Gorelova T. A. Globalizatsiya i global′nyy neokolonializm [Globalization and global neocolonialism]. PolitBook, 2013: 3: 115–131 (in Russ.). EDN: SBMXCN.
9. Gorelov A. A., Gorelova T. A. Capitalist ideology and political culture in the format of global neo-colonialism. PolitBook, 2015: 4: 110–124 (in Russ.). EDN: VQFKOD.
10. Gureyeva M. A., Larionov I. K. Russia's economic security in the context of its escalating confrontation with the West. Ekonomicheskiye sistemy, 2019: 12(1): 33–41 (in Russ.). EDN: HINZIR.
11. Deych T. L. China in Africa: "neocolonialism" or a "win-win" strategy? Kontury global′nykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2018: 11(5): 119–141 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-5-119-141; EDN: YOLFUL.
12. Dementyev V. E., Novikova E. S., Ustyuzhanina E. V. Russia's place in global value chains. Natsionalnyye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost, 2016: 12 (1): 17–30 (in Russ.). EDN: VHYWRD.
13. Dubrovin M. A. Global neocolonialism: formulation of the concept. Voprosy ekonomiki i prava, 2019: 130: 14–17 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14451/2.130.14; EDN: HVOTCZ.
14. Dunayeva M. D. Neocolonialism as the basis of relations between France and Algeria at the present stage. In Science. Education. Innovations: the current state of current problems. Anapa: OOO “NICESP” v YuFO, 2023: 15–19 (in Russ.). EDN: KYBGPO.
15. Zhdanovskaya A. A. Vneshniy dolg kak forma ekonomicheskoy zavisimosti [External debt as a form of economic dependence]. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki RAN, 2018: (2): 173–187 (in Russ.). EDN: YWYRKA.
16. Intellectual colonialism in the global educational market. Ed. by S. A. Sharonov, N. V. Trubnikova. Moscow, RUDN, 2017: 229 (in Russ.). EDN: ZQSJTR.
17. Kuzmenko I. V. Neokolonializm v mezhdunarodnykh institutakh podderzhki slaborazvitykh gosudarstv (na primere Vsemirnogo banka) [Neocolonialism in international institutions supporting underdeveloped states (on the example of the World Bank)]. Filosofiya prava, 2009: 2(33): 86–89 (in Russ.). EDN: KWSMIT.
18. Ledenyova M. V. Politika natsional′nogo bogatstva kak faktor vyzhivaniya v usloviyakh globalizatsii [The policy of national wealth as a factor of survival in the context of globalization]. Natsional′nyye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost, 2011: 7(32): 12–20 (in Russ.). EDN: NYHVYP.
19. Ledenyova M. V. Globalization and neocolonialism: how to get rid of addiction? Voprosy bezopasnosti, 2015: 6: 1–16 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.7256/2409-7543.2015.6.17933; EDN: VSPOFV.
20. Lenin V. I. Imperializm, kak vysshaja stadija kapitalizma (Populjarnyj ocherk) [Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism]. In Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: v 55 t. [Complete Works: in 55 vol.]. 5^th ed. Moscow, Gospolitizdat, 1969: 27: 299–426 (in Russ.).
21. Martynenko T. S. Environmental inequality: modern approaches to the conceptualization of the concept. Vestnik Tomskogo gosun-ta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, 2020: 57: 200–214 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/57/19; EDN: VIJPAC.
22. Pantserev K. A. Informatsionnyy imperializm: prepyatstviye na puti stran tropicheskoy Afriki k nezavisimomu razvitiyu [Information imperialism: an obstacle on the path of Tropical African countries to independent development]. Izvestiya RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2009: 114: 355–362 (in Russ.).
23. Pantserev K. A. Information imperialism as a form of neo-colonialism in Africa: past, present, future In Africa: postcolonial discourse: Abstracts of reports of participants of the All-Russian Conference. Ed. By T. M. Gavristova, N. E. Khokholkova. Yaroslavl, Filigran, 2020: 90–92 (in Russ.). EDN: SEOCNZ.
24. Parfenov D. A. Ekonomicheskaya politika Rossii v kontekste sovremennogo neokolonializma [The economic policy of Russia in the context of modern neocolonialism]. Rossiyskoye predprinimatel′stvo, 2012: 21(119): 4–10 (in Russ.). EDN: PFCUKH.
25. Popov V. A. Neotraditionalism, neo-nationalism and neo-colonialism in Africa: postcolonial discourse. In Africa: postcolonial discourse. Ed. By T. M. Gavristova, N. E. Khokholkova. Yaroslavl, Filigran, 2020: 92–94 (in Russ.). EDN: AQJXYA.
26. Prebish R. Periferiynyy kapitalizm: yest li yemu alternativa? [Peripheral capitalism: is there an alternative to it?]. Moscow, ILA, 1992: 331 (in Russ.).
27. Sirotkina A. I. Evolution of theoretical views on neocolonialism as an economic category. Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii, 2020: 3: 82–97 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4067063; EDN: WARNLO.
28. Sirotkin A. I., Al′pidovskaya M. L. Neocolonialism of the XXI century: globalism and the world-system. Teoreticheskaya ekonomika, 2020: 12(72): 96–109 (in Russ.). EDN: GOPGKI.
29. Subetto A. I. Economic colonialism and the collapse of market reforms in Russia. In The advent of the era of great noospheric socialist transformations. Ed. by A. V. Vorontsova. St. Petersburg, Asterion, 2019: 52 (in Russ.).
30. Khalidov D. SH. Rossiyskaya versiya neokolonial′noy sistemy obrazovaniya [The Russian version of the neocolonial education system]. Problemnyy analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoye proyektirovaniye, 2013: 6(1): 110–112 (in Russ.). EDN: QOUHTD.
31. Shulga A. A. Neocolonialism in Africa and globalization: What do they have in common? Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosun-ta. Ser.: Politologiya. Religiovedeniye, 2016: 18: 68–74 (in Russ.). EDN: WNDLZZ.
32. Yagutkina E. S., Yagutkin S. M. Technologies of modern anti-Russian socio-intellectual neocolonialism. In Management in the XXI century. Belgorod, ID "Belgorod", 2015: 344–349 (in Russ.). EDN: ZGXMNP.
33. Acselrad H. Grassroots reframing of environmental struggles in Brazil. In Carruthers D. V. (ed.) Environmental Justice in Latin America: Problems, Promise, and Practice. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2008: 75–97.
34. Adoko T. et al. (Neo)-Colonialism, globalised modernisation and global energy and environment: A review of available opportunities and their threats to globalization. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 2021: 9(3): 95–207.
35. Adow M. The climate debt: what the West owes the rest. Foreign Affairs, 2020: 99(3): 60–68. Accessed 15.02.2024. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2020-04-13/climate-debt
36. Alonso A., Costa V., Maciel D. The formation of the Brazilian environmental movement. Working paper series, 259. Brighton: IDS, 2005. Accessed 10.01.2024. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237402569_The_Formation_of_the_Brazilian_Environmental_Movement
37. Aydin M., Turan Y. E. The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020: 27(34): 43233–43245. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10238-9.
38. Bourdieu P., Passeron J. C. et al. Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, D.C., Sage. 2013: 288.
39. Brand U. The Global Political Economy of the imperial mode of living. Global Political Economy, 2022: 1(1): 26–37. DOI: 10.1332/PEIR2693.
40. Cheon Y., Danilova N. et al. Does trade openness convey a positive impact for the environmental quality? Evidence from a panel of CIS countries. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2019: 60(3): 333–356. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2019.1670087.
41. Couldry N., Mejias U. A. The costs of connection: how data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford, California, Stanford University Press, 2019: 324.
42. Couldry N., Mejias U. A. Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 2019: 20(4): 336–349. DOI: 10.1177/1527476418796632.
43. Dafoe A. On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 2015: 40(6): 1047–1076. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915579283.
44. Dever J., Dever J. Information Age Imperialism: China, ‘Race,’ and Neo-Colonialism in Africa and Latin America. University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 2021: 1: 1–48. Accessed 15.02.2024. Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr/vol52/iss2/3
45. Devine J. A., Baca J. A. The political forest in the era of green neoliberalism. Antipode, 2020: 52(4): 911–927. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12624.
46. Doğan B., Ghosh S. et al. Are economic complexity and eco-innovation mutually exclusive to control energy demand and environmental quality in E7 and G7 countries? Technology in Society, 2022: 68(1): 101867. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101867.
47. Gould K. A., Pellow D. N., Schnaiberg A. Interrogating the treadmill of production: Everything you wanted to know about the treadmill, but were afraid to ask. Organization and Environment, 2004: 17(3): 296–316.
48. Imbong R. A. Neocolonialism and the Technopolitics of Specialization: Toward a Reimagination of the Sociotechnical Imaginaries Approach. Bandung, 2023: 10: 283–301. DOI: 10.1163/21983534-10020008.
49. Jabłoński M. The ‘Illusion’ of Social Research/Action. Reflections on Neo-Colonial Pedagogy. Qualitative Sociology Review, 2021: 17(1): 96–109. DOI: 10.18778/1733-8077.17.1.7.
50. Kitchin R., Lauriault T., McArdle G. Smart cities and the politics of urban data. In Marvin S., Luque-Ayala A., McFarlane C. (eds), Smart urbanism: Utopian vision or false Dawn? Routledge, 2013: 16–33.
51. Langan M. Neo-Colonialism and the Poverty of 'Development' in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2018: 253.
52. Latour B., Schultz N. On the Emergence of an Ecological Class: A Memo. Cambridge, Polity, 2022: 92.
53. Lin B., Liu X. Dilemma between economic development and energy conservation: energy rebound effect in China. Energy, 2012: 45(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.077.
54. Mann M. The New Climate War: The Fight to Take Back our Planet. New York, Public Affairs, 2021: 272.
55. McCarthy D. Imposing Evenness, Preventing Combination: Charting the International Dynamics of Innovation in American Foreign Policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2021: 34(2): 296–315. DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2021.1877617.
56. Mouton M., Burns R. (Digital) neo-colonialism in the smart city. Regional Studies, 2021: 52(12): 1890–1901. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1915974.
57. Murphy R. Rationality and Nature: A Sociological Inquiry into a Changing Relationship. Boulder, Westview Press, 1994: 294.
58. Navarro R. Climate Finance and Neo-colonialism: Exposing Hidden Dynamics. In Cash C., Swatuk L. A. (eds) The Political Economy of Climate Finance: Lessons from International Development. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 2022: 179–203. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-12619-2_8.
59. Newell P. Race, class and the global politics of environmental inequality. Global Environmental Politics, 2005: 5(3): 71–94. DOI: 10.1162/1526380054794835.
60. Obikwelu J., Gérard-Marie M., Odumegwu A. The Effects of Neocolonialism on Africa’s Development. PanAfrican Journal of Governance and Development, 2023: 4(2): 3–35. DOI: 10.46404/panjogov.v4i2.4846.
61. Opoku E. E. O., Boachie M. K. The environmental impact of industrialization and foreign direct investment. Energy Policy, 2020: 137: 111178. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111178.
62. Patel S. Anti-colonial thought and global social theory. Frontiers in Sociology, 2023: 8. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1143776.
63. Polloni-Silva E., Ferraz D. et al. Environmental Kuznets curve and the pollution-halo/haven hypotheses: an investigation in Brazilian municipalities. Sustainability, 2021: 13(8). DOI: 10.3390/su13084114.
64. Sklair L. The Transnational Capitalist Class. Maiden, MA, Blackwell. 2001: 335.
65. Tayebi S. K., Younespour S. The effect of trade openness on environmental quality: evidence from Iran’s trade relations with the selected countries of the different blocks. Iranian Economic Review, 2012: 16(32): 19–40.
66. Viola E., Gonçalves V. K. Brazil ups and downs in global environmental governance in the 21st century. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 2019: 62 (2). Accessed 10.02.2024. URL: https://www.scielo.br/j/rbpi/a/b4VFtsXTyzCK9FDzJcjM4DS/?lang=en
67. Wallerstein I. The modern world system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world economy in the sixteenth century. New York, Academic press, 1974: 244.
68. Xuereb K. Neo-colonialism in cultural governance in the EU: a Maltese case study. European Journal of Cultural Management and Policy, 2019: 9(1): 4–17. Accessed 15.02.2024. URL: https://www.encatc.org/media/5137-neocolonialism-in-cultural-governance-in-the-eu-a-maltese-case-study.pdf
69. Yu C., Nataliia D., Yoo S.-J., Hwang Y.-S. Does trade openness convey a positive impact for the environmental quality? Evidence from a panel of CIS countries. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2019: 60(3). DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2019.1670087.
70. Yurdakul M., Kazan H. Effects of eco-innovation on economic and environmental performance: evidence from Turkey’s manufacturing companies. Sustainability, 2020: 12(8). DOI: 10.3390/su12083167.
71. Zografos C. The contradictions of Green New Deals: green sacrifice and colonialism. Soundings, 2022: 80: 37–50. DOI: 10.3898/SOUN.80.03.2022.