The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the life-event structure of generations of Russians based on empirical data from the Russian Social Survey (RSS) wave 9, comparable with ESS. The analysis showed that the life calendar of currently living generations of Russians is quite strongly structured - events occur in certain and rather narrow time intervals and in a certain sequence. A feature of the life calendar in Russia is a high concentration of all the basic events of the first phase of adult life in a narrow time interval, a short period of entry into adulthood. Events of the late stage of life show greater chronological diversity and scenario variability. Significant differences in the life-event matrix of generations in Russia were found, including an increase in the average age of onset of almost all basic life events, an expansion of the boundaries of age-related life stages, an extension of the path of growing up and the transition from maturity to old age, as well as diversification of life scenarios in the professional and family-marital spheres. When comparing the indices of standardisation of the main events between generations, a trend towards destandardisation of life paths was revealed: in older generations, the level of similarity is significantly higher than among younger generations. The main changes occurred in the generation of 1970-1979 and accelerated in the next generation of 1980-1989. Macro-demographic factors, as well as changes in socio-economic and historical conditions, the transition to a post-industrial society might be named among possible reasons. The trend towards destandardisation of life paths in older generations primarily affected people with a higher level of education, while in younger generations it acquired a broader social and class character; gender differences began to appear in the generation of the 1980s. The authors suggest that the increase in destandardisation of life paths may have multidirectional social and individual consequences. On the one hand, new opportunities for development, building a life path taking into account individual characteristics, talents and desires, greater flexibility of life trajectories, a decrease in normativity and social pressure. On the other hand, this may lead to increased uncertainty, social tension, increased inequalities, and a deepening conflict between “fathers and children,” which will increase social risks in the foreseeable future.

life course, structuring of life time, life events matrix, timing of life, generations, destandartization of life course

1. Andreenkova A. V. Life course studies – conceptual and methodological approaches and solution. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 2024: 12(1): 6–24 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/snsp.2024.12.1.1; EDN: ADRPHA.
2. Zakharov S. V. Cennostno-normativnye «raspisaniya» chelovecheskoj zhizni: predstavleniya zhitelej raznyh stran o tom, kogda devushka stanovitsya vzrosloj [Value-normative timing of human life: perceptions of residents of different countries about how girl become adult]. Rossiya v Evrope [In Russia in Europe]. Ed. by A. V. Andreenkova, L. A. Belyaeva. Moscow, Academia, 2009: 13–46 (in Russ.).
3. Mitrofanova E. S. Models of transition to adulthood of different Russian generations. Demografisheskoe obozrenie, 2019: 64(4): 53–82 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v6i4.10427; EDN: GSPPFS.
4. Noskova A. V. Changing family relations – gender and generations. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2017: 2: 158–160 (in Russ.). EDN: YGAMXJ.
5. RSS Russian Social Survey comparable with ESS: official website of the project. Moscow, 2024. Accessed 15.08.2024. URL: http://russiansocialsurvey.ru/ (in Russ.).
6. Rodionova L. A., Kopnova E. D. Gender and Regional Differences in the Life Expectancy in Russia. Voprosy statistiki, 2020: 27(1): 106–120 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.34023/2313-6383-2020-27-1-106-120; EDN: JSPKMQ.
7. Sinyavskaya O. V., Chervyakova A. A. Active Aging in Russia during Economic Stagnation: What Can We Learn from the Dynamics of the Active Agеing Index? Monitoring obshestvennogo mnenia: ekonomicheskie i socialnye peremeny, 2022: 5: 94–121 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2022.5.2043; EDN: GNFMLV.
8. Alwin D. F. Life Course, life cycle, life history, life span and life stage. In Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions. Dordrecht, Springer, 2013: 1167. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_201175.
9. Beck U. Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1992: 260.
10. Billari F. C., Liefbroer A. C. Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research, 2010: 15(2-3): 59–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2010.10.003.
11. Blossfeld H. P., Hofmeister H. Globalization, uncertainty and women's careers: an international comparison. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006: 475.
12. Bras H., Liefbroer A., Elzinga C. H. Standardization of pathways to adulthood? An analysis of Dutch cohorts born between 1850 and 1900. Demography, 2010: 47(4): 1013–1034. DOI: 10.1007/ BF03213737.
13. Furstenberg Jr. F. F. On a new schedule: Transitions to adulthood and family change. The future of children, 2010: 20(1): 67–87. DOI: 10.1353/foc.0.0038.
14. Kohli M., Meyer J. W. Social structure and social construction of life stages. Human Development, 1986: 29: 145–149. DOI: 10.1159/000273038.
15. Kogan I., Noelke C., Gebel M. (eds). Making the Transition: Education and Labor Market Entry in Central and Eastern Europe. Stanford University Press, 2011. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvqsdktc.
16. Lesnard L., Cousteaux A-S. et al. Do Transitions to Adulthood Converge in Europe? An Optimal Matching Analysis of Work– Family Trajectories of Men and Women from 20 European Countries. European Sociological Review, 2016: 32: 3: 355–369. DOI: jcw003.10.1093/esr/jcw003.
17. Macmillan R., Copher R. Families in the life course: Interdependency of roles, role configurations, and pathways. Journal of Marriage and Family, 2005: 67(4): 858–879. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00180.x.
18. Settersten R. A., Furstenberg F. F., Rumbaut R. G. On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research, and Public Policy. University of Chicago Press, 2006: 504.
19. Spéder Z., Murinkó L., Settersten R. A. Are Conceptions of Adulthood Universal and Unisex? Ages and Social Markers in 25 European Countries. Social Forces, 2014: 92(3): 873–98. DOI: 10.1093/sf/sot100.