The article examines the possibilities and scientific prospects of comparative studies of interregional differences and inequalities in Russia and Italy. These countries, located at a considerable distance, belonging to different geographical zones, cultural environments and civilisational areas, differ significantly in their global status. Despite the self-evident nature of these differences, they have long been perceived in both the Russian and Italian research traditions as countries subject to comparison. They act for each other - and to a large extent because of the same differences - as a conceptual resource, an element of the external environment and external surroundings, a source and factor of development. This comparability has its regional dimension. It extends to the field of research on interregional inequalities and contradictions, examining the dialectic of "center - regions" and forming a special comparative direction in terms of research methodology. This study is an excursion into the field of historical, sociological and political regional studies. The author evaluates the achievements and results obtained by domestic and Italian authors, as well as the prospects for scientific developments in this area. Interregional inequalities, inevitable for Italy, which was among the countries that "came second", given their relatively late introduction to the technogenic civilisation, have acquired the meaning and significance of a national problem. Almost from the moment of the emergence of a single Italian state, it has been known as the southern question. The North-South dichotomy in Italy is the embodiment of regional differences, disproportions, and contradictions. It reflected the conflict between the unification of traditionalist social structures and the need to preserve their diversity. This dichotomy remarkably seemed to anticipate the formula of the same name of modern times, which denotes the division and split of the modern global world into rich northern and poor southern countries. In conceptual schemes of variability, that is, on the one hand, unity and similarity, and on the other, differences between Russia and Italy, including in the field of comparative regional studies, contrasting comparisons, which were more or less rightfully attributed a constant character, have long prevailed. This established picture of variability has undergone significant modifications in the process of erosion of political subcultures of both the left and right persuasion, secularisation and rationalisation of public consciousness. The author concludes that the example of Italy shows how archaic social practices can be combined with modern technologies, and this can give rise to very bizarre social collisions.

Russia, Italy, comparative regionalism, regional inequalities, unification, diversity, contrast comparations, variability, constant inequalities

1. Baranov A. V. Separatism in contemporary Italy: factors of development, instituonalization, political strategies. Chelovek, soobshestvo, upravlenie, 2015: 1(16): 78–90 (in Russ.). EDN: TWTLPD.
2. Vyalkov Y. A. Liga Severa i ee plany` regionalnogo pereustrojstva Italii [The Nothern League and plans of regional reconstruction of Italy]. Mezhdu separatizmom i avtonomiej. Regionalnye i etnicheskie partii v evropejskoj politike [In Between separatism and autonomy. Regional and ethnic political parties in the European politics]. Ed. by V. Ya. Shvejczer. Moscow, Ogni TD, 2006: 73–87 (in Russ.).
3. Vyalkov Yu. A. Problema regionalnogo nacionalizma v Italii (poslednyaya chetvert` XX veka) [A problem of the regional nationalism in Italy (the last quarter of the XX century)]. Novaya i novejshaya istoriya, 2007: 6: 24–36 (in Russ.). EDN: ICCCFZ.
4. Galkina T. A. Italiya postindustrialnaya [The post-industrial Italy]. Geografiya mirovogo razvitiya: sbornik nauchny`x trudov: K 90-letiyu Instituta geografii RAN [In The geography of world development. Collection of scientific papers. For the 90th anniversary of the Institute of geography of RAS]. Iss. I. Ed. by L. M. Sinczerov, 2009: 565–581 (in Russ.). EDN: YSWKGJ.
5. Goffe N. V. Italiya: problema Yuga i regional'naya politika (1950 – 1980) [Italy: the problem of the South and regional policy (1950 – 1980).] Moscow, Nauka, 1983: 128 (in Russ.).
6. Goffe N. V. The South and the problems of the meridionalization of Italy. In A global world. Emerging models of national and regional development. Vol. 2. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2014: 206–213 (in Russ.). EDN: TEXIAP.
7. Doroshina A. V. The political activity of the youth of Russia in comparison with the activity of the youth of Poland, Germany and Italy. In The sociological narrative 2020. Society in the era of turbulence: searches, threats and prospects. Ed. By R. I. Anisimov. Moscow, RGGU, 2020: 302–307 (in Russ.). EDN: TMRDBT.
8. Kolomiets V. K. The conceptualization of development: current approaches. Istoriya i sovremennost’, 2019: 3(33): 49–62 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.30884/iis/2019.03.03; EDN: VLZMWN.
9. Kolomiets V. K. Italy: an example of forced catch-up development of spatial social reality. Istoriya i sovremennost’, 2020: 2(36): 29–45 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.30884/iis/2020.02.02; EDN: PRLEYZ.
10. Kolomiecz V. K. Regions of Russia – regions of Italy: traditions and prospects of comparative research. In Intercivilizational interactions and prospects for the development of human potential of Russia and Mongolia. On the occasion of the 100^th anniversary of diplomatic relations. Coll. of art. Ed. by A. S. Zheleznyakov. Moscow, FNISC RAN, 2021: 197–201 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/sbornik.978-5-89697-386-7.2021.26; EDN: WMBLRY.
11. Kolomiets V. K. Russia and Italy: trends of historical development of the 20th – the beginning of the 21th centuries of interaction of spatially integrated social realities. Istoriya i sovremennost’, 2021: 3(41): 54–84 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.30884/iis/2021.03.02; EDN: LERRLT.
12. Kolomiyets V. K. Italy vs Russia: the regional dimension of spatial social realities. Istoriya i sovremennost’, 2022: 3(45): 23–34 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.30884/iis/2022.03.02; EDN: TLCCYF.
13. Kolosov V. A. Relevance and main directions of the study of phantom boundaries. In Strategy for the development of border territories: traditions and innovations. Ed. by L. B. Vardomskij, L. I. Popkova, C. Mądry. Kursk, KGU, 2017: 256–267 (in Russ.). EDN: WVEGZX.
14. Kolosov V. A. Phantom borders in the post-Soviet space. In Russian borderlands: challenges of neighbourhood. Ed by V. Kolosov. Moscow, IP Matushkina I. I., 2018: 183–199 (in Russ.). EDN: ZCIDXW.
15. Kondrichin S. V. Differenciaciya socialnogo prostranstva Rossii i Italii: istoricheskaya obuslovlennost` yavleniya [Differentiation of social spaces in Russia and Italy: historical conditionality]. Socziologicheskij zhurnal, 2008: 1: 73–83 (in Russ.). EDN: PFCFLV.
16. Kondrichin S. V. Differenciaciya socialnogo prostranstva Rossii i Italii: istoricheskaya obuslovlennost` yavleniya [Differentiation of social spaces in Russia and Italy: historical conditionality]. Clio, 2008: 2(41): 108–113 (in Russ.). EDN: JUJUDD.
17. Lisovskij Yu. P. Sel’skoe khozyajstvo i krestyanskoe dvizhenie v sovremennoj Italii [Agriculture and the peasant movement in modern Italy]. Moscow, Nauka, 1966: 256 (in Russ.).
18. Lisovskij Yu. P. Yuzhnyj vopros i soczialnye konflikty v sovremennoj Italii. Opyt ekonomiko-socziologicheskogo issledovaniya [The Southern question and social conflicts in Italy. The experience of eonomic and sociological research]. Moscow, Nauka, 1979: 376 (in Russ.).
19. Lisovskij Yu. P. Italiya: ot fashizma k demokratii. Trudnye puti poslevoennoj perestrojki [Italy: from fascism to democracy. The difficult ways of post-war perestroika]. Moscow, Nauka, 1990: 286 (in Russ.).
20. Lisovskij Yu. P. Sociokul`turny`e predposy`lki modernizacii. (Poslevoennaya Italiya) [Socio-cultural prerequisites of modernization. (Post-war Italy)]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 1992: 6: 167–175 (in Russ.).
21. Pantin V. I. Main factors of uneven development among Russian regions. Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 2023: 14: 4: 219–233 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/vis.2023.14.4.12; EDN: RUAFWS.
22. Popov D. I. Italy on the way to the regionalized state: the second half of the XIX^th – the beginning of the XX^th century. Vestnik Omskogo un-ta. Ser. Istoricheskie nauki, 2017: 4(16): 13–21 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25513/2312-1300.2023.4.13-21; EDN: YLUIVA.
23. Rusakov N. P. Iz istorii siczilijskoj mafii [From the history of the Sicilian Mafia]. Moscow, Nauka, 1969: 179 (in Russ.).
24. Sigachov M. I. Between regionalism and pan-Italian nationalism: the right-wing populism of the Lega Nord. Istoriya i sovremennost’, 2020: 3: 42–62 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.30884/iis/2020. 03.03; EDN: VBUEZW.
25. Kholodkovskij K. G. Italiya: massy i politika. Evolyucziya soczialno-politicheskogo soznaniya trudyashcihsya v 1945 – 1985 gg. [Italy: the masses and politics. The evolution of the socio-political consciousness of workers in 1945 – 1985.] Moscow, Nauka, 1989: 256 (in Russ.). EDN: SJXBFX.
26. Yahimovich Z. P. Liga Severa: avtonomisty ili separatisty? [League of the North: autonomists o separatists?]. Mezhdu separatizmom i avtonomiej. Regionalnye i etnicheskie partii v evropejskoj politike [Between separatism and autonomy. Regional and ethnic political parties in the European politics]. Ed by V. Ya. Shvejczer. Moscow, Ogni TD, 2006: 88–97 (in Russ.).
27. Bellè E. From territory to community. Inside the “Black Box” of the Lega Nord’s populism. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 2015: 1: 89–110. DOI: 10.3240/79642.
28. Jamieson A. The Antimafia. The Italy’s fight against organized crime. London, Macmillan Press LMT, 2000: XXII-258. DOI: 10.1057/9780333983423.
29. Bin R. The red thread of the dialectic between unity and autonomy: yesterday, today, tomorrow. Le Regioni, 2021: 49(1-2): 41–55 (in Ital.). DOI: 10.1443/101361.
30. Camerlengo Q. Unity and selfgovernment: a matter of political direction. Le Regioni, 2021: 49(1-2): 57–69 (in Ital.). DOI: 10.1443/101362.
31. Cardano M., Panzarasa M. Mafia, fra biografia, storia e politica. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 2018: 1: 171–184 (in Ital.). DOI: 10.1423/89780.
32. Degl’Innocenti M. L’avvento della Regione 1970 – 1975. Manduria – Bari – Roma, Piero Lacaita Editore, 2004: 364 (in Ital.).
33. Della Morte M., Giatta M. A. La Strategia per lo sviluppo delle Aree Interne e la sua implementazione in Molise e in Abruzzo. Le Regioni, 2017: 6: 1270–1277 (in Ital.). DOI: 10.1443/91374.
34. Donolo C. Southern question. Parolechiave, 2015: 2(54): 5–20 (in Ital.). DOI: 10.7377/82304.
35. EURISPES. Rapporto Italia 20020. Accessed 12.03.2024. URL: https://www.eurispes.eu/ricerca-rapporto/rapporto-italia-2020/ (in Ital.).
36. Giannola A. Dalla dipendenza alla interdipendenza Nord – Sud: una nuova stagione per la ripresa dello sviluppo. Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, 2017: 4: 843–856 (in Ital.). DOI: 10.1432/90197.
37. Kolomiez V. Il Bel Paese visto da lontano… Immagini politiche dell’Italia in Russia da fine Ottocento ai giorni nostri. Manduria – Bari – Roma, Piero Lacaita Editore, 2007: 280 (in Ital.). EDN: QORFRZ.
38. Lupo S. La mafia. Centosessant’anni di storia. Tra Sicilia e America. Roma, Donzelli, 2018: 416 (in Ital.).
39. Mastropaolo A. The Southern question is a political question. Parolechiave, 2015: 2(54): 43–56 (in Ital.). DOI: 10.7377/82307.
40. Miotti D. Zone Economiche Speciali per accelerare i processi di sviluppo delle Regioni del Sud appartenenti all’area della convergenza e non solo di quelle. Rivista giuridica del Mezzogiorno, 2017: 4: 1001–1024 (in Ital.). DOI: 10.1444/88904.
41. Santillo M., Marino A. La questione delle disuguaglianze e dei divari socio-economici nella storia italiana dalla fase post-unitaria alla fine dell’intervento straordinario. Rivista giuridica del Mezzogiorno, 2021: 2-3: 469–485 (in Ital.). DOI: 10.1444/100992.