Research ArticleGrigory Y. Kanarsh Candidate of Political Science Institute of Philosophy of RAS, Moscow, Russia grigkanarsh@yandex.ruORCID ID=0000-0003-4723-9820Review of the monograph "Sociocultural Studies of Post-Soviet Transition in Russia". Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2023. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 236-245Дата поступления статьи: 05.04.2023Topic: About new scientific publicationsFor citation: Kanarsh G. Y. Review of the monograph "Sociocultural Studies of Post-Soviet Transition in Russia". Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2023. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 236-245DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2023.14.3.13. EDN: ZKHARAТекст статьиAbstractThis review discusses a collective monograph authored by researchers from the Center for the Study of Sociocultural Changes at the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, titled "Sociocultural Studies of Post-Soviet Transition in Russia". It provides a brief summary of both the monograph itself and the reviewer's reflections on the centre's years of research. The reviewer notes that this book not only summarizes the center's recent research but also delves into methodological questions, discusses the issue of the social state, problems of modernisation, the structure of Russian society, and questions related to Russia's civilisational development. According to the reviewer, the most interesting chapters are those dedicated to the historical formation of the social state and the sociological analysis of contemporary Russian society. While acknowledging the valuable insights presented in the book, the reviewer also provides constructive criticism of certain ideas presented within. Overall, the monograph is assessed as making a significant contribution to the study of post-Soviet transition in Russia.Keywordssocio-cultural studies, Russia, post-Soviet transit, anthroposociocultural approach, values, welfare state, structuring of society, modernization, civilizational developmentReferences Kanarsh G. Yu. Lapin N. I. The Complexity of the Formation of a New Russia. Anthroposociocultural Approach. Moscow: Ves` Mir, 2021. Reviewed by G. Yu. Kanarsh. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2022: 8: 167–171 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250020844-1; EDN: ZYGOZU. Kanarsh G. Y. The present and the future of the social state in Russia. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2020: 90, 9: 891–898 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0869587320070051; EDN: RKVRER. Kanarsh G. Y. The Social state in Russia: history and modernity. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2018: 2: 73–82 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2018.2.7; EDN: LYIGUP. Lapin N. I. The complexity of the formation of a new Russia. Anthroposociocultural approach. Moscow, Ves' Mir, 2021: 364 (in Russ.). Pantin I. K. The Choice of Russia: the nature of change and the dilemmas of the future. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 2007: 4: 113–135 (in Russ.). EDN: JUIVRJ. Pateman C. Mass participation and the theory of democracy. In Theory and practice of democracy. Selected texts. Eng. transl. ed. by V. L. Inozemtsev, B. G. Kapustin. Moscow, Ladomir: 462: 34–39 (in Russ.). Reznik Y. M. The welfare state in the era of globalization of capitalism (reflexive and critical analysis). In The formation of the welfare state and the prospects of the welfare state in Russia. Realities and projects. Ed. by N. I. Lapin. St. Petersburg, Renome, 2019a: 95–117 (in Russ.). Reznik Y. M. The Welfare State and its role in the emancipation of the human life world. In The formation of the welfare state and the prospects of the welfare state in Russia. Realities and projects. Ed. by N. I. Lapin. St. Petersburg, Renome, 2019b: 200–224 (in Russ.). Pateman C. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1970: 122. Content Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2023. Vol. 14. No. 3