The article deals with the phenomenon of human loneliness in the city. The ever-increasing role of the city as a living space causes changes both in the way of life of a person and in his inner world. Loneliness, being at all times an immanent companion of being, is also distinguished by specific features in modern social realities. Their formation was influenced by dynamic social factors and agents. The purpose of the article is to outline the social contour of urban loneliness by analysing relevant theoretical, methodological and empirical data.

The methodology for researching the issue was determined by the urban discourse in sociology (G. Simmel, R. Park, A. Lefebvre); social concepts of loneliness (N. Pokrovsky, Zh. Puzanova, E. Klinenberg); the concept of a modern complex society (Z. Bauman, S. Kravchenko), as well as elements of the socio-spatial approach. The empirical basis of the research is represented by a series of semi-formalised focused interviews with respondents - residents of large cities of the Far Eastern Federal District of the Russian Federation using the narrative principle of data processing, as well as elements of content analysis.

The results of the study are presented by empirically identified narratives of loneliness, the interpretation of their social context. The grounds for the analysis of loneliness as a phenomenon receiving additional development in the conditions of multidirectional and non-linear processes of urban life are noted. A factor social role in this process is played by the diversity and differentiation of public life, social anomie and individualisation of life practices, the crisis of the institution of trust as a value of collective interactions, and the ongoing “atomisation” of households. Also of major importance are the fundamental shifts in the mass consciousness, that led to the perception of a voluntary solitary lifestyle as beneficial and valuable. The social contours of loneliness are affiliated with the intensity of the urban lifestyle, individualism, and uncertainty about the future.

The author formulates a conclusion about the low level of social capital of respondents as one of the significant factors of loneliness, as well as about the resource nature of the city in the development of loneliness as a personal experience, and in the practice of a lonely lifestyle.

loneliness, urban loneliness, city, city space, urbanisation, globalisation, anomie, social trust, lonely (singular) lifestyle

1. Amin Je., Trift N. Vnyatnost' povsednevnogo goroda [The visibility of the everyday city]. Logos, 2002: 3-4 (34): 1–25 (in Russ.).
2. Berzin B. Ju., Kuz'min A. I., Pyshminceva O. A. The reproduction trajectories of institutions of social isolation of individual population groups in the regions of Russia. Ekonomika regiona, 2015: 3: 123–133 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/2015-3-11.
3. Baudrillard J. Simulacra and simulations. Moscow, Ripol-Klassik, 2017: 320 (in Russ.).
4. Vlasova E. G. Self-narrative and urban identity construction in the urban-oriented media. Medialingvistika, 2019: 6(3): 303–314 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21638/spbu22.2019.302.
5. Kljajnenberg Je. A solo life. New social reality. Moscow, Al'pina non-fikshn, 2014: 279 (in Russ.)
6. Kozyreva P. M., Smirnov A. I. Loneliness: age features. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2020: 9: 56–69 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009617-1.
7. Kostko N. A. Indicators of urban identity as an element of the city’s social space. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii. 2022: 25 (1): 190–216 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31119/jssa.2022.25.1.7.
8. Kravchenko S. A. Innovations in Sociological Knowledge: following the results of the XIII conference ECA. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2018: 2: 18–24 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518020034.
9. Kravchenko S. A. « Normal'naya» anomiya: kontury kontseptsii ["Normal" anomie: the contours of the concept]. Sorsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2014: 8: 3–10 (in Russ.).
10. Kurennoj V. A. The power of weak connections. Citizen and the right to loneliness. In Citizen: what do we know about a resident of a big city? Moscow, 2017: 216 (in Russ.).
11. Latour B. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor Network-Theory. Transl. from Eng. by I. Polonskaya. Moscow, VSHE, 2014: 384 (in Russ.).
12. Lebedev V. I. Psihologiya i psihopatologiya odinochestva i gruppovoj izolyacii [Psychology and psychopathology of loneliness and group isolation]. Moscow, Unity-Dana, 2002: 408 (in Russ.).
13. Lefevr A. Ideas for the concept of new urbanism. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye, 2002: 2(3): 19–26 (in Russ.).
14. Lefevr A. Space production. Transl. from Fr. I. Staf. Moscow, Strelka Press, 2015: 432 (in Russ.).
15. Mamford L. The myth of the machine. Technics and Human Development. Transl. from Eng. by T. Azarkovich, B. Skuratov (1 chapter). Moscow, Logos, 2001: 408 (in Russ.).
16. Mareeva S. V. Monetary inequality in Russia in the sociological dimension. Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 2020: 11: 3: 78–98 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/vis.2020.11.3.664.
17. Nikolaeva Zh. V., Troitskaya A. A. Discourse on identity as a way of understanding urban space. Zhurnal frontirnykh issledovaniy, 2020: 1(17): 11–28 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2500-0225-2020-10001.
18. Park R., Bankovskaya S. City as a social laboratory. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye, 2002: 2 (3): 3–12 (in Russ.).
19. Pirni A. Exclusion, transition, and recognition: normative archetypes for crossing urban social spaces. Zhurnal frontirnykh issledovaniy, 2020: 1 (17): 29–39 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2500-0225-2020-10002.
20. Pokrovsky N. E., Ivanchenko G. V. Universum odinochestva [Universum of Loneliness]. Moscow, Logos, 2008: 408 (in Russ.).
21. Puzanova Zh. V. Sociological study of loneliness: the problem of conceptual model development. Vestnik RUDN. Ser.: Sotsiologiya, 2009: 2: 42–46 (in Russ.).
22. Puzanova Zh. V., Trotsuk I. V. Narrative analysis: concept or metaphor? Sotsiologiya: 4M, 2003: 17: 56–82 (in Russ.).
23. Puzanova Zh. V. Philosophy of loneliness and loneliness of the philosopher. Vestnik RUDN. Ser.: Sotsiologiya, 2003: 4-5: 47–58 (in Russ.).
24. Sennet R. Capitalism in a big city: globalization, flexibility and indifference. Logos, 2008: 3 (66): 95–107 (in Russ.).
25. Starikov E. N. Marginals. In: In the human dimension. Мoscow, Mysl, 1989. 180–203 (in Russ.).
26. Fukuyama F. The Great Disruption. Moscow, AST, 2003. 474 (in Russ.).
27. Shtompka P. Trust is the foundation of society. Moscow, 2016. 440 (in Russ.).
28. Bauman Z. Retrotopia. Trans. from Eng. by V. L. Silayeva. Moscow, VTSIOM, 2017: 160 (in Russ.).
29. Burlina C.,  Rodríguez-Pose A. Alone and Lonely. The economic cost of solitude for regions in Europe. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. April 2023. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X231169286.
30. Ortiz-Ospina E. The rise of living alone: how one-person households are becoming increasingly common around the world. Our Word in data. December 2019. Accessed 09.07.2022. URL: https://ourworldindata.org/living-alone
31. Snell K. The rise of living alone and loneliness in history. Social History, 2017: 42 (1): 2–28. DOI: 10.1080/03071022.2017.1256093.