The article analyses the features of volunteer activities of educational communities of students (schoolchildren, students of colleges and universities), which are formed under the influence of the educational environment. The purpose of the study is to identify differences in the volunteer practices of young people at different levels of education that affect the volunteer activities of students, to reveal the conditions for its formation and development. The empirical base of the work is the data of a questionnaire survey of young people aged 14-24 years (n = 996, the sample is by quota), including 42% of high school students, 30% of students of educational institutions of secondary vocational education and 28% of university students from 70 municipalities of the Sverdlovsk region. The survey is complemented by data from 9 focus group interviews with students from schools, colleges and universities in Yekaterinburg, N. Tagil and Krasnoturinsk conducted in 2022. The data of sociological research allowed to characterise volunteer practices typical for schoolchildren and students, related to the experience and nature of this activity among young people, as well as to the conditions of the educational environment.

The educational community with the most pronounced volunteer subjectivity is university students. They have higher involvement in volunteering, self-identification with the status of a volunteer, self-motivation of volunteering. At the same time, the role of mentors is levelled in universities, the connection between education and volunteer activity is fragmented. Typical volunteer practices of schoolchildren are largely based on the values that are laid down in the framework of informal education. The school experience of volunteering is characterised by a pronounced emotional dominance, fragmentation, fragmentation, and largely unsystematic. It is effective largely due to the personality of the mentor-teacher, involving high school students. Volunteering of college students is characterised by a clearly reduced motivation with the dominant administrative-authoritarian nature of the organisation of volunteering by teachers-organisers and limited variability of projects and areas of volunteer participation.

The article shows the dependence of the nature of volunteer practices of young students on the organisational environment of the education system at its different levels. The practical significance of the study is related to the rationale for the need to introduce the “service-learning” technology into the educational programmes of colleges and universities. It will increase the role of mentors in shaping students' volunteer practices and implement volunteer activities in the educational process, thereby influencing the deepening of students' involvement in volunteer projects, expanding the variability of the latter and increasing their attractiveness for young people.

volunteering, social projects, educational activities, formal, non-formal, informal education, educational environment, level of education

1. Aksenova O. V. The subject of social action in Russia’s current development: actor, agent, nobody? Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 2020: 11 (2): 37–53 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/vis.2020.11.2.640.
2. Anderzhanova Z. A. Vovlechenie v volontyorskuyu deyatel'nost' vospitannikov detskih domov kak faktor ih socializacii [Involving orphanage residents in volunteer activities as a factor in their socialization]. Social'naya politika i sociologiya, 2010: 3: 203–210 (in Russ.).
3. Belanovskij Yu. S., Shirshova I. V. Mir social'nogo volonterstva: metod. posobie [The World of Social Volunteering: A Methodical Guide]. Moscow, GBU goroda Moskvy «Mosvolontyor», 2018: 96 (in Russ.).
4. Basheva O. A., Ermolayeva P. O. The phenomenon of digital volunteerism in emergency situations: its essence, types and theoretical framework. Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 2020: 11 (1): 49–71 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/vis.2020.11.1.625.
5. Buyakova K. I., Malkova I. Yu. Volunteering as a Form of Students’ Educational Activities in the Context of the University’s Third Mission. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2021: 30 (8–9): 69–79 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-8-9-69-79.
6. Zakirova L. F. Method of “Service-learning” in foreign pedagogy (on the example of german universities). Kazanskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal, 2010: 5–6: 158–164 (in Russ.).
7. Zborovsky G. E., Ambarova P. A. Sociology of higher education: monograph. Ekaterinburg, University for the Humanities, 2019: 539 (in Russ.).
8. Katarov V. K., Shtykov А. S., Butenko А. А., Konovalov А. P. University discipline management system: program‑oriented approach. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2015: 5 (99): 115–122 (in Russ.).
9. Kisilenko A. V. Volunteering: the potential of self-organization of the russian youth. Nauchnyi resultat. Sociologiya i upravlenie, 2018: 4 (1): 63–71 (in Russ.).
10. Kislyakov P. A., Shmeleva E. A., Govin O. Contemporary volunteering in the formation of prosocial behaviour of a person. Obrazovanie i nauka, 2019: 6 (21): 122–145 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-6-122-145.
11. Klucharev G. A. Ontological Problematics in Sociological Interpretation: To the Question Statement. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2022: 1: 5–16 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250017230-6; EDN: OFZZNJ.
12. Kozel' V. N. Sobytijnoe volontyorstvo kak tekhnologiya vovlecheniya gorozhan v sistemnuyu volontyorskuyu deyatel'nost': metod. posobie [Event Volunteering as a Technology for Involving Citizens in Systemic Volunteer Activity : A Methodological Guide]. Moscow, GBU goroda Moskvy «Mosvolonter», 2018: 99 (in Russ.).
13. Lavrent'ev A. V., Sharahina L. V., Yudina A. A. Vnedrenie volontyorskoj praktiki v obrazovatel'nyj process: ucheb. posobie [Introduction of Volunteer Practice in the Educational Process: Textbook]. St. Petersburg, SPbGEU, 2014: 65 (in Russ.).
14. Linovich M. V. Vnedrenie obrazovatel'noj praktiki “Obuchenie cherez volontyorstvo” v sistemu akademicheskogo obrazovaniya v Rossii [Introducing the educational practice of "Learning by Volunteering" into the system of academic education in Russia]. Volontyor, 2012: 1–2: 34–37 (in Russ.).
15. Martynova M. D., Surkova I. M., Lyubushkin V. S. International event as a source of volunteer personal grouth: sociological survey and cases (experience of volunteer’s program of volunree’s center of football world cup FIFA 2018 in Russia, host‐city Saransk. Primo aspectu, 2018: 2: 33–40 (in Russ.).
16. Mersiyanova I. V., Malahov D. I., Ivanova N. V. The Role of Family as a Channel of Intergenerational Transmission of Volunteer Traditions in Contemporary Russia. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi sociologii, 2019: 20 (3): 66–89 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1726-3247-2019-3-66-89.
17. Patnem R. Chtoby demokratiya srabotala. Grazhdanskie tradicii v sovremennoj Italii [Making Democracy Work. Civic traditions in contemporary Italy]. Transl. from Eng. by A. Zaharova. Moscow, “Ad Marginem”, 1996: 287 (in Russ.).
18. Prokazina N. V., Bobyleva N. Yu., Hatnyuk N. N. Realization of voluntary (volunteer) capacity in Russia. Nauchnyi resultat. Sociologiya i upravlenie, 2019: 5 (2): 47–56 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-2-0-5.
19. Khaliy I. A. Modern social movements: innovative potential of Russian transformation in traditional milieu. Moscow, IS RAN, 2007: 300 (in Russ.).
20. Yanickij O. N. Volontyory: grazhdanskie i gosudarstvennye. Sociologicheskaya nauka i social'naya praktika, 2014: 1: 71–89 (in Russ.).
21. Aboramadan M. Factors that drive volunteerism in nonprofit organizations: A theoretical framework. Selected Aspects of Non-Profit Organisations. IntechOpen, 2019. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.86943.
22. Bekkers R. Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources, personality, and political values. Political psychology, 2005: 26 (3): 439–454. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00425.x.
23. Brown S., Taylor K. Charitable behavior and the big five personality traits: Evidence from UK panel data. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015: 9318. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2656503. Accessed 08.06.2023. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2656503
24. Chen L., Chen Z., Xu X. The value, key and path of cultivating college students’ spirit of voluntary service in colleges and universities. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 2022: 1 (2): 87–92. DOI: 10.54097/jeer.v1i2.3579.
25. Gesthuizen M., Scheepers P. Educational differences in volunteering in cross-national perspective: Individual and contextual explanations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2012: 41 (1): 58–81. DOI: 10.1177/0899764010394203.
26. Handy F., Cnaan R. A. The role of social anxiety in volunteering. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2007: 18 (1): 41–58. DOI: 10.1002/nml.170.
27. Jones K. S. Giving and volunteering as distinct forms of civic engagement: The role of community integration and personal resources in formal helping. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2006: 35 (2): 249–266. DOI: 10.1177/0899764006287464.
28. Lough B. J. International Volunteering. In List R., Anheier H., Toepler S. (eds) International Encyclopedia in Civil Society. Springer, Cham, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99675-2_9531-1.
29. Lough B. J., Oppenheim W. Revisiting reciprocity in international volunteering. Progress in Development Studies, 2017: 17 (3): 197–213. DOI: 10.1177/14649934177132750.
30. Nursey-Bray M., Kamal M., Giacomo M., Millcock S. Building community resilience through youth volunteering: towards a new model. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2022: 9 (1): 242–263. DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2022.2067004.