The purpose of the article the author sees as the identification of actors of non-capital industrial cities of Tatarstan, the clarification of their relationship and forms of participation in urban development. The activities of urban communities and their leaders are considered in the article from the standpoint of its perception by residents, in terms of influencing their decision to stay in the city/leave it.

The exploratory nature of the study led to the use of the method of group problem-oriented interviews carried out by the author in 2021 during reconnaissance field trips to the cities of Tatarstan: Naberezhnye Chelny, Nizhnekamsk, Almetyevsk, Zelenodolsk. They took place in families that made it possible to increase the number of interviewees, compare the opinions of different generations and achieve a comfortable atmosphere for conducting interviews, and were accompanied by notes.

The study preliminary confirmed the hypothesis that the key players in non-capital industrial settlements in Russia are the municipal authorities and communities that develop around their leading enterprises. The significance of both in different cities varies, that depends on the industry, functional affiliation of industries and a number of subjective factors, primarily on the ability of leaders-managers to build a strategy and tactics of participation in urban processes. The main forms of such participation for manufacturing companies are: social support for employees, sponsorship of city events, inclusion in regional programmes to improve the urban environment and the implementation of their own projects in the field of healthcare, specialised and general education, sports, culture, and city spaces. Representatives of the city administration more often perform not only managerial functions, but also act as a link between the actors of urban processes. Individual small and medium-sized businesses take part in the latter, and the role of cultural workers depends on the development of the cultural environment of the city. The practices of urban activists are limited to single actions, although activism is revealed at the level of courtyards and volunteer movements. It has been empirically confirmed that a significant contribution to the development of the cities of Tatarstan is made by regional authorities. In the indicated context, the life strategies of citizens reveal complex trajectories that depend, among other things, on the activities of the actors under consideration that affect the level and quality of life in the city, and residents´ opportunities for self-realisation.

sociology, region, industrial city, urban development actors, leading enterprise, municipal authorities, regional authorities, life strategies, the Republic of Tatarstan

1. Balyushina Y. L. Modern university in a provincial town: problems and prospects of development. Vizual'naya antropologiya. Gorod-universitet: ZHiznennoe prostranstvo i vizual'naya sreda. Mat. III Mezhd. nauch. konf.[Visual Anthropology – 2019. City-University: Living space and visual environment. Materials of the III International Scientific Conference]. Ed. by S. S. Avanesov, E. I. Speshilova. Novgorod: NGU imeni Yaroslava Mudrogo, 2020: 344−350 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.34680/visant-2020-344-350
2. Belyaev V. A., Kalimullina E. R. Intergenerational mobility from small cities: real motives and simulacrus. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii, 2017: 4: 233−238 (in Russ.).
3. Wirt L. Izbrannye raboty po sociologii. Sbornik perevodov [Selected works on sociology. Collection of translations]. Transl. from Engl. V. G. Nikolaev, ed. by L. V. Girko. Moscow, INION, 2005: 233 (in Russ.).
4. Dubinkin E. P. Local economic mainstay in mono town can be considered as a full subject of territory promotion. Brending malyh i srednih gorodov Rossii: opyt, problemy, perspektivy: materialy Vseros. zaoch. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Branding of small and medium-sized cities of Russia: experience, problems, prospects. Materials of the All-Russian correspondence scientific and practical conference]. Ekaterinburg, UrFU, 2014: 85−87 (In Russ.).
5. Evstifeev R. V. Designing city identities: goals, mechanisms, actors. Proksima. Problemy vizual'noj semiotiki. 2020: 4: 75−89 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2020-4-75-89
6. Zaborova E. N. Labor market development in towns of the Urals: position of the government, business, and population. Social'no-trudovye issledovaniya. 2021: 43(2): 110−118 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.34022/2658-3712-2021-43-2-110-118
7. Zamyatina N. Yu., Pilyasov A. N. Innovacionnyj poisk v monoprofil'nyh gorodah: blokirovki razvitiya, novaya promyshlennaya politika i plan dejstvij [Innovative search in mono-profile cities: development blockages, new industrial policy and action plan]. Moscow, URSS, 2015: 213 (in Russ.).
8. Zamyatina N. Yu., Pilyasov A. N. New industrial policy in mono-profile cities of Russia. Sovremennyye proizvoditel′nyye sily, 2015: 1: 37−55 (in Russ.).
9. Zaitseva E. V., Azorkina E. A., Alekseychuk A. S. Scientists of yekaterinburg as actors promoting the movement for the preservation of industrial heritage. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossijskoj Akademii nauk. Istoricheskie nauki, 2021: 3(1): 118−124 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.37313/2658-4816-2021-3-1-118-124
10. Zimina E. V., Nefedeva E. I., Popova E. A. Social activity of monotown enterprises (on the example of the center for social programs of RUSAL and Shelekhov town). Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2020: 14(8): 1625−1644 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/ce. 14.8. 110768
11. Zubarevich N. Cities as the Centers for the Modernization of the Economy and Human Capital. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 2010: 5: 5−19. Accessed 22.02.2022. URL: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2012/09/25/1251346584/%D0%97%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87.pdf (in Russ.).
12. Kulay S. V. Foreign Experience of Single-Industry Towns Modernization and Economic Restructuring. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyj vestnik, 2019: 73: 224−248. Accessed 01.03.2022. URL: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://e-journal.spa.msu.ru/uploads/vestnik/2019/vipusk__73._aprel_2019_g./regionalnaja_ekonomika/kulay.pdf (in Russ.).
13. Small towns in the social space of Russia. Ed. by V. V. Markin, M. F. Chernysh; Preface M. K. Gorshkov. Moscow, 2019: 545 (in Russ.) DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-323-2.2019
14. Maly V. I., Gusev V. V. Russian innovative Monotowns: positive experience of socio-economic development. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniy, 2020: 5(20): 40–48 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/1682-2358-2020-5-40-48
15. Markin V. V., Malyshev M. L., Zemlyanskij D. YU. Monitoring regional strategies of spatial development of Russian cities: modelling political and administrative practices. Part 1. Monitoring pravoprimeneniya, 2020: 3 (36): 51–65 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21681/2226-0692-2020-3-51-65
16. Park H. City as a social laboratory. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye, 2002: 2(3): 3−12 (in Russ.).
17. Plotnikova E. B., Markova Y. S. Modernization projects of industrial enterprises as a resource for the development of human potential of territories. Rossiya: tendencii i perspektivy razvitiya. Ezhegodnik, 2019: 311−314. Accessed 20.03.2022. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/modernizatsionnye-proekty-promyshlennyh-predpriyatiy-kak-resurs-razvitiya-chelovecheskogo-potentsiala-territoriy/viewer (in Russ.).
18. Roslyakova M. V. Urban communities as an object and the most important resource of municipal management. Politika i obshchestvo, 2018: 8: 42−55 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2018.8.27143
19. Ushakov V. A. Current state and prospects of development of the Russian system of large industrial cities. Ekonomika i upravleniye, 2009: 5 (98): 37−48 (in Russ.).
20. Florida R. Creative class: People who change the future. Moscow, 2005: 430. Accessed 03.03.2022. URL: https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=542385&p=1 (in Russ.).
21. Khounina E. A. The potential of industrial heritage redevelopment for the territorial development of the city: economic and socio-cultural aspects. Voprosy teoreticheskoj ekonomiki, 2020: 73: 117−125 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2587-7666-2020-10408
22. Yudin G. Luc Boltanski, Laurent Thevenot. Critique and Justification of Justice: An Essays on the Sociology of Worlds. Laboratorium, 2014: 6(3): 126−129 (in Russ.).
23. Beatty C., Fothergill S. Recovery or stagnation? Britain’s older industrial towns since the recession. Regional Studies, 2020: 54(9): 1238−1249. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1699651
24. Bole D., Kozina J., Tiran J. The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives. Moravian Geographical Reports, 2020: 28: 16−28. DOI: 10.2478/mgr-2020-0002
25. Bolzoni M. Who Shape the City? Non-profit associations and civil society initiatives in urban change processes: role and ambivalences. The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies, 2019: 12 (2): 436−459. DOI: 10.1285/I20356609V12I2P436
26. Clark J. "Reframing deindustrialization". International Journal of Urban Sciences, November 2020: 1−7. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2020.1843524
27. Felzensztein Ch., Gimmonb E., Deans K. R. Coopetition in regional clusters: Keep calm and expect unexpected changes. Industrial Marketing Management, 2018: 69: 116−124. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.013
28. Fraser A., Clark A. Damaged hardmen: Organized crime and the half‐life of deindustrialization". The British Journal of Sociology, 2021: 72 (1): 1062−1076. DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12828
29. Ganning J. P., Tighe J. R. Moving toward a shared understanding of the US shrinking city. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2021: 41(2): 188−201. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X18772074
30. Gros-Balthazard M., Talandier M. Cooperation, proximity, and social innovation: three ingredients for industrial medium-sized towns’ renewal? Urban Science, 2020: 4 (2): 1–21. DOI: 10.3390/urbansci4020015
31. Hodson P. Titanic struggle: Memory, heritage and shipyard deindustrialization in Belfast. History Workshop Journal. Oxford Academic, 2019: 87: 224−249. DOI: 10.1093/hwj/dbz003
32. Hölschera K., Wittmayera J. M., Avelinoa F., Giezenb M. Opening up the transition arena: An analysis of (dis) empowerment of civil society actors in transition management in cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019: 145: 176−185. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.004
33. Lees L., Slater T., Wyly E. Gentrification. New York, Routledge, 2008: 648.
34. Pike A. Coping with deindustrialization in the global North and South. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 2020: 1−22. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2020.1730225
35. Quark A. A. From global cities to the lands’ end: the relocation of corporate headquarters and the new company towns of rural America. Qualitative Sociology, 2007: 30 (1): 21–40. Accessed 12.03.2022. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11133-006-9053-6.
36. Sadeque S., Roy S. K., Swapan M. S. H., Chen C. H., Ashikuzzaman M. An integrated model of city and neighborhood identities: A tale of two cities. Journal of Business Research, 2020: 117: 780−790. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.040
37. Schindler S., Gillespie T., Banks N., Bayırbağ M. K., Burte H., Kanai J. M., Sami N. Deindustrialization in cities of the Global South. Area Development and Policy, 2020: 5 (3): 283−304. DOI: 10.1080/23792949.2020.1725393
38. Silver J. Decaying infrastructures in the post-industrial city: An urban political ecology of the US pipeline crisis. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2019: 4 (32). DOI: 10.1177/2514848619890513
39. Toura V. Shrinking cities and sustainability Deindustrialization and urban shrinkage. Achieving urban sustainability in former industrial cities in France: the case studies of Nantes and Saint-Ouen. AESOP, Jul 2019. Venice, Italy. Accessed 01.05.2022. URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02190090/document.
40. Uyttebrouck C., Remøy H., Teller J. The governance of live-work mix: Actors and instruments in Amsterdam and Brussels development projects. Cities. 2021: 113: 11. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103161
41. Valencia S. C., Simon D., Croese S., Nordqvist J., Oloko M., Sharma T. Adopting the Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda to the city level: Initial reflections from a comparative research project. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 2019: 11 (1): 1−20. DOI 10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172
42. Wagner T. E., Obermiller P. J. A Double-Edged Sword: Social Control in Appalachian Company Towns. Engineering Earth. Springer. Dordrecht, 2011: 1917−1935. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9920-4_106