The article presents reflections on the demand for change and the ongoing scholarly debate about its very existence in the contemporary Russian society. The author raises a number of topics that are significant for understanding the changes and considers them from the standpoint of a political psychologist. In partucular, the need to “decipher” the desire for change is noted, the ambiguity of the attitude towards stability is shown, the difficulty of determining the situation in society as a crisis or calm, the peculiarities of splits in Russian society are analysed. The key issue in the study of the demand for change is the question of self-regulation of the social and political system in the conditions when the needs for change and the need for stability in society counterbalance each other.

At the moment, when the situation is extremely uncertain, and new challenges and threats appear all the time, it is difficult to count on automatic adaptation to changes. So far, there is no answer to the question What kind of society we would like to have: the one with the dominating demand for change, or the one with citizens striving to maintain stability. This is the very image of the future, that should be built first in order to enable then search for relevant control mechanisms. If this desired model is not set, but simply attitudes towards change or stability are measured, it will make impossible to correctly interpret the results of the polls.

demand for change, stability, conservative ideology, liberal ideology

1. Volkov D.,Kolesnikov A. My zhdem peremen-2. Pochemu i kak formiruetsja spros na radikalnyje izmenenija [We are waiting for changes-2 Why and how the demand for radical changes is formed]. Moskovsky centr Karnegi, 2019, November. Accessed 16.12.2021. URL: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Carnegie_Moscow_Article_Volkov_Kolesnikov_Rus_Nov2109_final.pdf (in Russ.).
2. Diskin I. E. Rossiiskaja model socialnoy transformacii [Russian model of social transformation]. Pro et Contra, 1999: 3: 5–40 (in Russ.).
3. Latova N. V. Actors of demands for institutional changes in contemporary Russia. Journal of Institutional Studies, 2019: 11: 3: 119–134 (in Russ.).
4. Nemirovsky V. G.Tsennostnyje i socialno-soslovnyje prepjatstvija na puty sociokulturnoy modernizatsii Rossii o jeje regionov[Value and socio-cultural barriers on the way of socio-cultural modernization of Russia and it’s regions)]. Monytoring obshchstvennogo mnenija, 2013: 4: 57–70 (in Russ.).
5. Petuchov R. V. Demand for changes: political and value dimension. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2020: 6: 103–118 (in Russ.).
6. Poslanije prezidenta Federalnomu Sobranijy 15 janvarja 2021 goda [Message of the President to the Federal assembly January 15, 2021]. Official website of the President of Russia. Accessed 06.07.2022. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/messages/65418 (in Russ.).
7. Shestopal E. B. “They” and “We”: Perception of one’s own and other countries by Russian citizens. Obshchestvennyje nauky i sovremennost, 2021: 2: 90–102 (in Russ.).
8. Shestopal E. B. Chetvert veka politicheskih reform v Rossii s tochky zrenija psychologii [Quarter of a century of political reforms in Russia from the psychological perspective]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2015: 1: 136–150 (in Russ.).
9. Shestopal E. B.,Selezneva A. V. Socio-cultural threats and challenges in contemporary Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2018: 10: 90–99 (in Russ.).
10. Shtompka P. Sociologija socialnych izmeneneij [ Sociology of social changes]. Moscow, Aspekt-press, 1996: 13 (in Russ.).
11. Vserossiyskiy tsentr izucheniya obshchestvennogo mneniya [All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion]. Accessed 07.06.2022. URL: https://wciom.ru (in Russ.).
12. Stepantsov P,Vileikas A. Coronovirus I obshhestvo.kak rossijane reagirujut na epidemiju [Coronovirus and society. How Russians react to the pandemia]. Accessed 07.06.2022. URL: https://knife.media/corona-sociology-1/ (in Russ.).