The article is dedicated to the assessment of the correlation between the values of self-expression and survival among modern Russian students. The relevance of this topic is determined by the need to understand how to change the higher education system so that it correlates with the values of modern students and applicants, meets their expectations and needs. The article examines two aspects of the transformation of higher education: the institutional limitations of the modernisation of higher education and the value orientations of modern Russian students. Value orientations were operationalised using the approach of R. Inglehart and K. Welzel, based on the dichotomy of values of self-expression and survival, and institutional conditions - through the reproduction by the higher education system of the institutional trap “path-dependence”, to overcome which "critical mass" of subjects with dominant values of self-expression is required. The main research question was whether Russian bachelors have developed values of self-expression. The empirical basis of the study was the data of a mass survey of Russian students of 19 universities within the framework of the project "The Birth of a Russian Master's Degree" with the support of the Vladimir Potanin Charitable Foundation.

The research toolkit included a number of categories reflecting the meanings that students use when analysing the reasons for choosing a university, the direction of training and learning outcomes. One of these categories is the category of choice (of the university and field of study). The data obtained indicate that when answering the question about the reasons for choosing a university and the direction of study, there are, on average, two and a half times more students who chose the values of self-expression than those who are clearly focused on the values of survival. This suggests that, firstly, the importance of the values of emancipation (freedom of choice and development) in higher education is growing. Secondly, the potential for changes at the value level is accumulated in groups of students with different cultural capital - that is, we can talk about universal tendencies among the entire studied group. Thirdly, the choice of the direction of study turned out to be a more significant factor in the distribution of values than the choice of a university, that is, the motives for choosing a student are biased towards the content of their professional education in the first place, and the prestige of the university in the second place. Based on their analysis of the collected data, the authors come to the conclusion that modern Russian students are ready for meaningful changes in higher education. The only question is what answer to expect from the system.

higher education in Russia, path-dependence, values, transformation of higher education in Russia, students´ value orientations, strategy for the development of higher education, theories of modernisation, institutional traps

1. Auzan A. Path dependence problem: the evolution of approaches. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ekonomika, 2015: 1: 3–17 (in Russ.).

2. Velzel K. Freedom Rising. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal (Public Opinion Monitoring), 2017: 1(137):  270–271 (in Russ.).

3. Garmonova A. V., Shcheglova D. V. Teachers’ assessments of the changes in higher education in Russia: Transformation or stagnation? Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sociologiya, 2021: 13(4): 476–494 (in Russ.).DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2020.408

4. Changes in strategies, motivations and economic behavior of students and teachers of Russian universities. Monitoring ekonomiki obrazovaniya, 2019: 1(133): 84. Accessed 31.07.2021. URL: https://memo.hse.ru/data/2019/03/05/1196154632/2019_inbul_133(1).pdf (in Russ.).

5. Prakhov I. A. University Students in a Pandemic: Distance Learning, Work Trajectories and Perception of Limitations. Monitoring ekonomiki obrazovaniya, 2021: 1. Accessed 31.07.2021. URL: https://memo.hse.ru/published (in Russ.).

6. Terentyev E. A. Transition to distance learning and remote work in the assessments of the university teachers. Monitoring ekonomiki obrazovaniya, 2021: 4. Accessed 30.07.2021. URL:https://memo.hse.ru/published (in Russ.).

7. Yasin E. G. Modernizaciya i obshhestvo: doklad VIII Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferenciya «Modernizaciya ekonomiki i obshchestvennoe razvitie» [Modernization and society: report to the VIII International Scientific Conference "Economic Modernization and Social Development"]. Ed. by E. G. Yasin. Moscow, NRU HSE publ., 2007: 114 (in Russ.).

8. Adler P. S., Seok-Woo K. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 2002: 27(1): 17–40.

9. Chuang M., Chen C., Lin M. J. The impact of social capital on competitive advantage: The mediating effects of collective learning and absorptive capacity. Management Decision, 2016: 54(6): 1443–1463.

10. Dahlum S., Knutson C. Democracy by Demand? Reinvestigating the Effect of Self-expression Values on Political Regime Type. British Journal of Political Science, 2017: 47(2): 437–461. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123415000447/

11. Feeney S., Hogan J. A path dependence approach to understanding educational policy harmonisation: the qualifications framework in the European higher education area. Higher Education Policy, 2017: 30(3): 279–298. DOI: 10.1057/s41307-016-0019-3

12. Gregg G., Inglehart R. Cultural Change in the 21st Century. Political Psychology. 2020: 41(2): 425–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12625

13. Hofstede G. Cultural Differences in Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1986: 10(3): 301–320.

14. Inglehart R., Foa R., Peterson C., Welzel C. Development, Freedom and Rising Happiness: A Global Perspective 1981-2006. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2008: 3(4): 264–85.

15. Inglehart R. Cultural Evolution: People's Motivations are Changing and Reshaping the World. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018: 274.

16. Krücken G. Learning the “New, New Thing”: On the Role of Path Dependency in University Structures. Higher Education, 2003: 46(3): 315–39. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025344413682

17. Marta A. Shaw Public accountability versus academic independence: tensions of public higher education governance in Poland. Studies in Higher Education, 2019: 44(12): 2235–2248. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1483910

18. Mellander C., Florida R. Rentfrow J. The creative class, post-industrialism, and the happiness of nations. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2011: 5: 31–43.

19. Meyer H. D. Path dependence in German and American public education the persistence of institutional difference in a globalizing world. Shaping Education Policy: Power and Process, 2011: 189–211.

20. Minaeva E. Outbound Student Mobility in Russia: Creating a Path for Brain Circulation through Higher Education. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2020: 2: 24: 145–156. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2020.02.020

21. Pavlović Z. Individual and Country Level Determinants of (Post)Materialist Values in Eastern Europe. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 2015: 4: 2: 1–11.

22. Schwarz O. Cultures of choice: Towards a sociology of choice as a cultural phenomenon. The British journal of sociology, 2017: 69: 845–864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12305

23. Sukhanova G., Garmonova A. Educational Crisis in the Context of Master’s: The Opinions of Employers. The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education. 2020: 487–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40271-6_48

24. Veiga A. Unthinking the European Higher Education Area - differentiated integration and Bologna's different configurations. Innovation-the European journal of social science research. 2019: 32: 495–511. DOI:10.1080/13511610.2019.1666704