The authors consider one of the aspects of the socio-cultural integration of migrants into the host society. The integration of migrants is interpreted by a wide range of scientists as the process of including newly arrived in various spheres of life of the host society. Usually, there are three to four such spheres. Access of migrants to housing in the host country is an important indicator of integration in the socio-economic sphere. As a rule, in Russian and foreign studies, access to housing is assessed through a comparative analysis of the living conditions of migrants and the host population. However, access to housing and housing conditions are not exactly the same thing. Rather, access implies the potential for housing. To assess such a possibility, an experimental method that allows the researcher to test various hypotheses and control the variables of interest is more suitable than a mass survey or available statistical data.

The article contributes to the methodology for studying migrants' access to housing in the host country. It proposes a new approach to its assessment and presents the first results of its approbation. In the course of the experiment carried out by the authors, the influence of the citizenship of potential tenants on access to high-quality and low-quality housing in Moscow was measured, as well as the willingness of landlords to register migrants on their property.

Significant differences in the access of migrants from different CIS countries to renting Moscow accommodation were revealed. The most loyal attitude is towards Belarusians and Ukrainians, the least preferable are immigrants from Central Asia, especially citizens of Tajikistan. In addition, it was found that all groups of migrants are seriously limited in their ability to obtain a valid migration registration due to the unwillingness of the owners of residential premises to fulfil their obligations to “register” foreign tenants. This obviously impedes their integration in the political and legal sphere of the host society, since a foreign citizen in the Russian Federation without a genuine document on migration registration, even with all other permits, is a person with an unregulated legal status.

migration, integration, socio-economic sphere, access to housing, experimental method

1. Brednikova O., Tkach O. What Home Means to the Nomad. Laboratorium. Zhurnal social'nyh issledovanij, 2010: 3: 72–95 (in Russ.).

2. Grigoreva K. S., Mukomel V. I. Tasks and Implementation of Migration Law Reforms: Migration Registration, Regional Authorities, Corruption Risks, Fiscal Revenues. Migracionnoe parvo, 2018: 2: 3–8 (in Russ.).

3. Rocheva A. L. Research of “tenant career” positions and housing models of migrants from Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan in Moscow. Sociologicheskij zhurnal, 2015: Vol. 21: 2: 31–50 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2015.21.2.1319

4. Endryushko A. A. Social and economic potential of Azerbaijani migrants who entered Russia in 2014-2017. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny, 2018: 6: 216–233 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.6.11

5. Alba R., Nee V. Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration. International Migration Review, 1997: 31 (4): 826–874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2547416

6. Entzinger H. The Social Integration of Immigrants in the European Union. Keynote speech by Han Entzinger at the JILPT International Symposium «Migration Policy and Society in Europe» Tokyo, 17 January 2007. Accessed 21.07.2021. URL: https://www.jil.go.jp/foreign/event/symposium/sokuho/documents/20070117/Entzinger_ppt.pdf

7. Esser H. Does the «New» Immigration Require a «New» Theory of Intergenerational Integration? International Migration Review, 2006: 38 (3): 1126–1159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00231.x

8. OECD/EU, Settling In 2018: Indicators of Immigrant Integration, OECD Publishing, Paris/European Union, Brussels, 2018: 63–100. Accessed 21.07.2021. URL: https://www.oecd.org/publications/indicators-of-immigrant-integration-2018-9789264307216-en.htm

9. Penninx R. Integration of migrants: Economic, social, cultural and political dimensions. In: The new demographic regime: Population challenges and policy responses. Eds. M. Macura, A. L. MacDonald, W. Haug. New York, Geneva, United Nations, 2005: 137–152.

10. Penninx R. Problems of and solutions for the study of Immigrant Integration. Comparative Migration Studies, 2019: 7 (13): 2–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0122-x

11. Penninx R., Garcés-Mascareñas B. The Concept of Integration as an Analytical Tool and as a Policy Concept. In: Integration Processes and Policies in Europe. IMISCOE Research Series. Springer, Cham, 2016: 11–29.

12. Esser H. Integration und ethnische Schichtung, Mannheim: Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung, 2001: 40: 77. Accessed 21.07.2021. URL: wp-40.pdf: Integration und ethnische Schichtung (uni-mannheim.de)

13. Esser H. Welche Alternativen zur «Assimilation» gibt es eigentlich? IMIS - Beiträge, Osnabrück, 2004: 23: 41–59.