The article examines the peculiarities of the young people perception of political content in social networks. The use of an objective neurophysiological oculography method for the study of visual attention has been proposed. The empirical basis of the study was the analysis of 1500 social network posts of political orientation, to which the tagging of the visual part of the message was applied and basic behavioral statistics were collected, including indicators of communicability, attractiveness and virality. This allowed to conduct a primary classification of political content and form sets of stimulating material for conducting neurophysiological research. The research experiment consisted of consecutive displaying collages of various types of political content (memes, photographs of political leaders, photographs of political events and posters) and simultaneously recording the participants eye movement behavior using a web tracker. The obtained quantitative data was used to determine the trajectory of studying the stimulus material, as well as to assess visual attention when perceiving various types of political content. The study of the stimulus material begins with viewing the image in the upper left corner (0°–45°), then moves to the lower left corner (135°–180°), regardless of the type of content. It was discovered that the average duration of fixations for different types of political content differs significantly (H=8.201, df=3, p=0.042). The most attractive are memes and photographs of political leaders, the least attractive – posters. The first fixations are caused, as a rule, by the pattern of viewing visual information. An increase in the duration of perception of a stimulus leads to a redistribution of the duration of fixations to the images most interesting for the participants in the experiment. It was revealed that the average duration of fixations on the content entails its memorability (images), as indicated by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r=0.564, p=0.023). The obtained data on the visual perception of various types of political content allows to adjust and increase the effectiveness of the communication strategy for promoting certain accounts in social networks by actors of political power.

political communication, visual communication, political content, youth, neurophysiological research methods, oculography

1. Akaev D. K. Youth Political Culture Transformation: The Role of the Internet Communications. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya. 2016. No. 6 (57). P. 153–156. (In Russ.)
2. Gorshkov M. K., Sheregi F. E. Youth of Russia in the mirror of sociology. By the results of many years of research. Moscow: FNISTS RAS, 2020. 688 p. DOI 10.19181/ monogr.978-5-89697-325-6.2020 (In Russ.)
3. Eremenko Y. A., Ulanovskaya O. N. Modern methods and technologies of applied neuromarketing. Marketing in Russia and abroad. 2020. No. 2. P. 37–45. (In Russ.)
4. Rodkin P. Vizual’naya politika. Firmennyj stil’ Rossii. [Visual politics. Corporate style of Russia]. Moscow: Coincidence, 2007. 160 p. (In Russ.)
5. Rozin V. M. Vizual’naya kul’tura i vospriyatie. Kak chelovek vidit i ponimaet mir. [Visual culture and perception. How a person sees and understands the world]. Moscow: Komkniga, 2006. 224 p. (In Russ.)
6. Safonova A. S. Novye formy virtual’noj politicheskoj kommunikacii v molodezhnoj srede [New forms of virtual political communication in the youth environment]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Gumanitarnye i obschestvennye nauki. 2015. No. 2 (220). P. 30–34. (In Russ.)
7. Shkurko A. V. Na puti k neyrosotsiologii [On the way to neurosociology]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovanya. 2011. No.4. P. 13–22. (In Russ.)
8. Geise S., Panke D., Heck A. Still Images – Moving People? How Media Images of Protest Issues and Movements Influence Participatory Intentions. The International Journal of Press/ Politics. 2020. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 92–118. DOI:10.1177/1940161220968534.
9. Gil de Zúñiga H., Abril E., Rojas H. Weblogs, Traditional Sources Online and Political Participation: An Assessment of How the Internet Is Changing the Political Environment. New Media Camp Society. 2009. Vol. 11. № 4. Р. 553–574. DOI 10.1177/1461444809102960.
10. Goldberg J., Kotval X. Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 1999. Vol. 24. P. 631–645. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00068-7.
11. Grobelny J., Jach K., Kuliński M., Michalsk, R. Śledzeniewz roku w badaniach jako ściużytkowejo programowania. Historia imierniki. 2006. Accessed 22.11.2020. http://repin.pjwstk. edu.pl:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/186319/166/Kansei%202006_Grobelny.pdf?sequence=1.
12. Itti L. Quantifying the contribution of low-level saliency to human eye movements in dynamic scenes. Visual Cognition. 2005. Vol. 12. No. 6. P. 1093–1123.
13. Itti L., Koch C., Niebur E. A model of saliency-based visual-attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1998. Vol. 20. No. 11. P. 1254–1259. DOI: 10.1109/34.730558.
14. Jacob R., Karn K. Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research: Ready to Deliver the Promises. The Mind`s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Movement Research. 2003. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 573–605.
15. Marquart F., Matthes J., Rapp E. Selective Exposure in the Context of Political Advertising: A Behavioral Approach Using Eye-Tracking Methodology. International Journal of Communication. 2016. Vol. 10. P. 2576–2595.
16. Masciocchi C. M., Mihalas S., Parkhurst D., Niebur E. Everyone knows what is interesting: Salient locations which should be fixated. Journal of Vision. 2009. Vol. 9. No. 11. P. 1–22.
17. McMains S. A., Kastner S. Visual Attention Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Ed. by M. D. Binder, N. Hirokawa, U. Windhorst. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009. Accessed 12.10.2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_6344.
18. Plassmann H., Zoëga T. Ramsøy Milosavljevic M. Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook. Journal off Consumer Psychology. 2012. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 18–36. DOI: 10.1016/j. jcps.2011.11.010.
19. Salau A., Binti A., Hamid A., Ishak N. Social Media and Youth Online Political Participation: Persppectives on Cognitive Engagement. New media and mass communication. 2015. Vol. 44. P. 8–15.
20. Schill D. The Visual Image and the Political Image: A Review of Visual Communication Research in the Field of Political Communication. Review of Communication. 2012. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 118–142.
21. Turner S. Social Theory as a Cognitive Neuroscience. European Journal of Social Theory. 2007. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 357–374.
22. Xenos M., Vromen A., D. Loader B. The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society. 2014. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 151–167. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318.
23. Zillmann D., Knobloch S., Yu H. Effects of Photographs on the Selective Reading of News Reports. Media Psychology. 2001. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 301–324. DOI: 10.1207/ S1532785XMEP0304_01.