The article presents the results of a study aimed at determining the behavioral trajectories of women as a significant demographic segment, differentiated by gender, and identifying its significance for the process of formation and transformation of the market mechanism of the labor market in the Republic of Tatarstan. Forecasts of the impact of modern strategies of women’s labor behavior are substantiated from the standpoint of their determinant as a factor of demographic self-determination. In this regard, the strategies of women’s labor behavior identified by the authors allow to form a conceptually and methodologically justified model for managing the labor market mechanism in Tatarstan, including in relation to predictive decisions of a preventive policy for managing the market mechanism in order to optimize the use of the female labor force, creating demographically favorable conditions for increasing the number of qualified labor force, reduction of social tension and growth of socio-economic activity of the population in relation to the formation, distribution and use of labor force. The analysis of the obtained data allowed to identify four types of the correlation of the reproductive behavior of women and the strategy of labor activity chosen by them. The main types of labor behavior of women in the Republic of Tatarstan were identified as materially oriented, “health-caring”, “family-centered” and professionally oriented. The women interviewed in the study determine their reproductive strategies in accordance with the peculiarities of their self-realization in life, as well as with predetermined behavioral attitudes. Most women lack independence in issues of reproductive self-regulation. Consequently, in the choice of the nature and amount of work, most likely, women will not be completely self-sufficient. The authors also found that most women are focused on creating a family and having children. Thus, the main strategy of work behavior for them will be to combine work with childcare. However, it is worth noting that there are also a large number of young girls who belong to the “professional orientation” group and participate in primary and secondary professional integration. The results of the study led to the conclusion that the younger generation of women in the Republic of Tatarstan is focused to a greater extent on labor activity than on reproductive on

gender segregation, discrimination, labor behavior, demographic self-determination

1. Mezentseva E. B. Gender i economika: mirovoy opyt i expertiza rossijskoy praktiki [Gender and economics: World experience and examination of Russian practice]. Moscow: Russkaya panorama, 2002. 352 p. (In Russ.)
2. Siviakova E. A., Riabcev S. V. Modern methods of conflict management in organizations. Tendencii Razvitija Nauki i Obrazovanija. 2019. No. 49. Part 3. 98–102. DOI: 10.18411/lj-04- 2019-68. (In Russ.)
3. Tagarov, B. Economic reasons for gender inequality in the labor market. Russian Journal of Labor Economics, 2020. No. 7. P. 15–26. (In Russ.).
4. Anker R. Forthcoming Gender and jobs: Sex segregation of occupations in the world. Geneva, International Labour Office. 1998. P. 444.
5. Becker G. S. The economics of discrimination. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 1971. P. 178.
6. Bergmann B. Occupational segregation, wages and profits when employers discriminate by wage or sex. Eastern Economic Journal (Stores, CT). 1974. V. 1. No 2–3. P. 103–110.
7. Doeringer P., Piore M. Internal labor markets and manpower ana lys is . Lexington, D. C. Heath and Co. 1971. 212 p.
8. Edgeworth F. Y. Equal pay to men and women for equal work. Economic Journal (London). 1922. Vol. 32. No 4. P. 431–457.
9. Employment, incomes and inequality: A strategy for increasing productive employment in Kenya. Accessed 07.05.2020. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1972/72B09_608_ engl.pdf.
10. Enhancing women’s participation in economic development. The World Bank. Accessed: 07.05.2020. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/764641468135599885/ Enhancing-womens-participation-in-economic-development.
11. Enterprise Surveys. The World Bank Gender Data Portal. Accessed: 07.05.2020. Available at: https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/.
12. Frone M., Yardley J., Markel K. Developing and testing an integrative model of the work-family interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1997. V. 50. No 2. P. 145–167.
13. Gonzalez P. Indicators of the relative performance of women in the labour market. Mimeo. Geneva, International Labour Office. 1991. 234 p.
14. Gunderson M. Comparable worth and gender discrimination: An international perspective. Geneva, International Labour Office. 1994. 140 p.
15. Hill J., Yang C., Hawkins A., Ferris M. A cross-cultural test of the work-family interface in 48 countries. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2004. Vol. 66. No 5. P. 1300–1316.
16. Parasuraman S., Simmers C. Type of employment, work-family conflict and well-being: a comparative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2001. Vol. 22. No 5. P. 551–568.
17. Reynolds J. In the face of conflict: work-life conflict and desired work hour. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2005. Vol. 67. No 5. P. 1313–1331.
18. Scandura T., Lankau M. Relationships of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1997. Vol. 18. No 4. P. 377–391.
19. Spitze G. Women’s employment and family relations: a review. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1988. Vol. 50. No 3. P. 595–618.
20. Standing G. 1989. Global feminization through flexible labour. World Development. 1989. Vol. 17.No 7. P. 1077‒1095.
21. Terrell K. Female-male earnings differentials and occupational structure. International Labour Review (Geneva). 1992. Vol. 131. No 4–5. P. 387–404.
22. The world’s women 1970-1990: Trends and statistics. 1991. United nation publications (Web portal). Accessed 07.05.2020. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/Worldswomen/WW1990.pdf.
23. Women, work, and wages: Equal pay for jobs of equal value . Ed. by D. J. Treiman, H. I. Hartmanii. Washington, National Academy Press. 1981. 148 p.
24. Zakirova V. Gender inequality in Russia: The perspective of participatory gender budgeting. Reproductive Health Matters. 2014. Vol. 22. No. 44. P. 202–212.