The article presents materials of the semantic reconstruction of ideas of various forms of social protest among young people of two age groups based on the materials of an empirical study conducted in 2020. In the course of the study representatives of two socio-demographic groups of youth from Vladivostok (Primorsky Territory) were interviewed: higher education students aged 18–24 and young adults aged 25–30. The carried out semantic reconstruction allowed to formulate the structural and content characteristics of the young people ideas about the five significant forms of the collective protest: petition, rally, strike, riot and rebellion. The semantic connections of the protest forms with the existential and political values of the young people were revealed. The study also succeeded in reconstructing the emotional component of the protest phenomena ideas. The category structure of the semantic space of ideas about the forms of protest has been determined. Common categories identified on the basis of associations include “values and goals”, “subjects”, “emotions”, “characteristics of a phenomenon”, “protest”, and “cultural and historical connotations”. The general categories of protest assessment, according to the semantic differential (SD), include “iintellectuality and honesty”, “hypocrisy and self-interest (honesty)”, “peace – aggressiveness”, “strength”. These categories, identified on the material of associations, in comparison with the categories of thinking obtained using factor analysis of the semantic differential data, allow to reconstruct both rational and unconscious levels of ideas about protest. Comparative analysis of ideas about different forms of protest demonstrates that on an emotional level a rally is the closest to youth. On a rational level, the petition is also positively assessed, while the youth of both groups are dissatisfied with the ineffectiveness of this form in practice. Young people do not associate radical forms of protest (riot and rebellion) with values and goals significant to them. At the affective level, they are perceived mostly negatively. In general, the identified categories allow to reconstruct the structure of the organization of the subjective experience of perceiving different forms of political and social protest in two age groups of young people. The data obtained in this study can be useful for further study of protest moods, used by state authorities and political parties in practical work.

representation, protest, political consciousness, psychosemantics, rally, Vladivostok, youth

1. Akunina Y. A. Molodiozhnye dvizhenija sovremennoy Rossii: protest i sozidanie [Youth movements in modern Russia: protest and creativity]. Vestnik MGUKI. 2011. No 3 (41). P. 123–127. (In Russ.)
2. Baranova G. V. Metodika analiza protestnoy aktivnosti naselenija Rossii [The method of analysis of protest activity of the population of Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovanija. 2012. No. 10. P. 143–152. (In Russ.)
3. Bushuev D. V. Specifika protestnoy aktivnosti rossijskoy molodiozhi v sovremennom transformirujuschemsja obschestve [The specifics of the protest activity of Russian youth in contemporary transforming society]: avtoref. dis. kand. sociol. nauk. Rostov-on-Don, 2012. 15 p. (In Russ.)
4. Volkov D. Protestnye mitingi v Rossii kontsa 2011 – nachala 2012 gg.: zapros na modernizaciju politicheskih institutov [Protest rallies in Russia in late 2011 and early 2012: the request for the modernization of political institutions]. Vestnik obschestvennogo mnenija. 2012. No. 2 (112). P. 73–86. (In Russ.)
5. Gaba O. I. Molodiozh’ kak sub`ekt protestnykh nastroeniy [Youth as a subject of protest]. Znanie, ponimanie, umenie. 2015. P. 144–151. (In Russ.)
6. Zverev A. L., Palitaj I. S., Rogozar’ A. I., Smul’kina N. V. Osobennosti politicheskogo vosprijatija v sovremennykh rossijskih uslovijah [Features of political perception in modern Russian conditions]. Polis. Politicheskie Issledovanija. 2016. No. 3. P. 40–54. (In Russ.)
7. Krasin Y. A. The phenomenon of street protests and Russian choice track. Monitoring obschestvennogo mnenija: economicheskie i social’nye peremeny. 2012. No. 3. P. 92–99. (In Russ.)
8. Nazarov M. M. Politicheskiy protest: opyt empiricheskogo analiza [Political protest: an empirical evidence]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 1995. No. 1. P. 47. (In Russ.)
9. Petrenko V. F. Psihosemantichesky analiz imidzha politicheskikh liderov [Psychosemantic analysis of the image of political leaders]. Osnovy psihosemantiki [Foudations of Psychosemantics]. SPb.: Piter, 2005. P. 418–435. (In Russ.)
10. Petrenko V. F., Gladkih N. Y., Mitina O. V. Psychosemantic analysis of the perception of political leaders (based on a sample of students from South Korea). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 14. Psihologija. 2016. No. 2. P. 64–87. (In Russ.)
11. Petrenko V. F., Mitina O. V. Psihosemanticheskij analiz dinamiki obshhestvennogo soznanija. [Psychosemantic analysis of the dynamics of public consciousness ]. Moscow: MSU publ., 1997. 214 p. (In Russ.)
12. Petrenko V. F., Mitina O. V. Psihosemanticheskij analiz politicheskogo mentaliteta obshhestva [Psychosemantic analysis of the political mentality of society]. Vestnik SPbGU. Ser. 16. Psihologija. Pedagogika. 2015. No. 3. P. 27–40. (In Russ.)
13. Petrenko V. F., Mitina O. V. Psychosemantic approach in the reconstruction of political mentality: methods and examples of research. Vestnik Rossijskoy akademii nauk. 2017. Vol. 87. No. 1. P. 50–64. DOI: 10.7868/S086958731701008X (In Russ.)
14. Petrushina A. V. Protestnoe uchastie molodezhi v sovremennom rossijskom obschestve [The protest participation of young people in contemporary Russian society]. Izvestija Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2011. No. 1. P. 337–346. (In Russ.)
15. Salahutdinova R. H. The Factors of Formation of the Protest Behavior of Young People in Modern Russia. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Series 12. 2012. No 4. P. 167–173 (In Russ.)
16. Serkin V. P. Reshenie zadachi o sluchaynosti / ne sluchaynosti associaciy: kriteriy ocenki i validny nabor associaciy [Solving the problem of randomness / non-randomness of associations: evaluation criteria and a valid set of associations]. Psihodiagnostika. 2009. No 4. (In Russ.)
17. Serkin V. P. Metody psihologii sub’ektivnoj semantiki i psihosemantiki [Methods of psychology of subjective semantics and psychosemantics]. Moscow: Pchela publ. 2008. 378 р. (In Russ.)
18. Solomatina E. N. Social protests in the modern world: sociological analysis. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Serija Social’nye nauki. 2014. No 1. P. 103–107. (In Russ.)
19. Shestopal E. B., Novikova-Grund M. V. Vosprijatie obrazov dvenadcati vedushhih rossijskih politikov (psihologicheskiн i lingvisticheskiн analiz) [Perception of the images of the twelve leading Russian politicians (psychological and linguistic analysis)]. Polis. Politicheskie Issledovanija. 1996. No 5. P. 168–191. (In Russ.)
20. Shestopal E. B., Nesterova S. V., Bukreeva O. V., Smul’kina N. V., Zatonskih A. V., Titov V. V. Obrazy kandidatov v prezidenty 2012 v massovom soznanii [Images of presidential candidates 2012 in the public mind]. Vlast’. 2012. No 3. P. 186–190. (In Russ.)
21. Shestopal E. B., Shutov A. Y., Volodenkov S. V., Gaman-Golutvina O. V., Lapkin V. V., Makarenko B. I., Mezhuev B. V., Mel’vil’ A. Y., Smul’kina N. V., Nesterova S. V. Images of leaders in the public mind on the eve of the presidential election. Polis. Politicheskie Issledovanija. 2012. No 4. P. 160–174. (In Russ.)
22. Shmelev A. G., Pohil’ko V. I., Kozlovskaja-Tel’nova A. Y. Praktikum po experimental’noy psihosemantike. Tezaurus lichnostnyh chert. [Workshop on experimental psychosemantics. Thesaurus of personality traits]. Moscow: MSU publ.. 1988. 118 р. (In Russ.)
23. Davis J. A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation. Sociometry. 1959. Vol. 22. No 4. P. 280–296.
24. Kamans E., Otten S., Gordijn E. H. Threat and power in intergroup conflict: How threat determines emotional and behavioral reactions in powerless groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 2011. No 14. P. 293–310.
25. Klandermans B., Van der Toorn J., Van Stekelenburg J. Embeddedness and identity: How immigrants turn grievances action. American Sociological Review. 2008. No 73. P. 992–1012.
26. McClurg S. D. Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly. 2003. No. 56. P. 448–464.
27. Van Stekelenburg J., Klandermans B. The social psychology of protest. Current Sociology. 2013. Vol. 61. No. 5–6. P. 886–905.
28. Van Stekelenburg J., Klandermans B., Van Dijk W. W. Combining motivations and emotion: The motivational dynamics of collective action participation. Revista de Psicologìa Social. 2011. No 26. P. 91–104.
29. Van Zomeren M., Postmes T., Spears R. Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin. 2008. No 134. P. 504–535.
30. Wright S. C., Taylor D. M., Moghaddam F. M. The relationship of perceptions and emotions to behavior in the face of collective inequality. Social Justice Research. 1990. No 4. P. 229–250.