This article presents an attempt to define the framework and the possible guidelines for analyzing the influence of professional education on social stratification given the current conditions of social reality.

The author points out that the structural changes in all social institutions (including professional education and the labor market), the fluidity and dynamism of modern social reality, and conserving a dichotomy of fluidity when speaking of the Russian context – rigidity, the expansion and inflation of professional education combined with the preservation of inequality when it comes to implementing educational trajectories – all of this makes studying the connection between social stratification, professional education and social mobility ever the more relevant.

Researchers face the following acute questions: what sort of role is played by professional education in promoting or restricting an individual’s social mobility? How has the expansion and inflation of education redefined the selection and allocation of human capital? In which way does the connection change between social stratification, professional education and social mobility, what are the foundations, the sociological study tradition and the theoretical-methodological prospects for the future?

In order to find answers, the author examines both traditional theoretical-methodological approaches, and ones that are new to sociology of education.

The article substantiates the notion that structural-functional theory does not possess a comprehensive explanatory potential in the study of the socio-structural role of professional education in regards to social mobility. The author substantiates the following thesis from a conflict analysis standpoint: democratizing access to professional education does not mean the reduction of class inequality or the emergence of a society of equal opportunity. Within the paradigm of an activity-related approach in sociology of education, where education is viewed not just as a separate social institution, but as part of a larger system of social action and social inequality, the definitive role of motivation and proactiveness is emphasized, with them producing a positive effect when it comes to attaining higher professional status.

The accelerating rate of change in society, the multidimensionality and polyvariance in implementing educational and professional trajectories in modern society indicate the need for a multidimensional evaluation of social mobility. In regards to the topic of education, and when it comes to analyzing the implementation of educational trajectories, professional education represents a vital condition and a necessary prerequisite for an individual to exercise social mobility both in terms of objective and subjective coordinates of mobility, and in regards to research methods and methodology, this demands synthesizing quantitative and qualitative research strategies, and, consequently, opens up new opportunities for interpreting results and perceiving social reality.

sociology, social stratification, professional education, social mobility, education, labour market

Il’in V.I. Sotsial’ny siorfing kak model’ molodiozhnogo obraza zhizni. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: economicheskiye i sotsial’nye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, 2019: 1: 28–48 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/ monitoring.2019.1.02.

Konstantinovskiy D.L. Inequality and Education. Attempt of sociological research on the life starts of the Russian youth (1960th – beginning of 2000th). Moscow, TSSO, 2008: 551 (In Russ.).

Kozyreva P.M., Nizamova A.E., Smirnov A.I. Resources and practices of socio-economic adaptation of the population of Russia. Moscow, Novy khronograf, 2013: 328 (In Russ.).

Latova N.V., Latov Y.V. Methodology of institutional analysis of social inequality in access to andragogic education. Terra Economicus = Terra Economicus, 2010: vol. 8: 3: 64–81 (In Russ.).

Multidimensional social mobility in modern Russia. Ed. by M.F. Chernysh, J.B. Epikhina. Moscow, FCTAS RAS publ., 2018: 112 (In Russ.).

Popova E.S. “Second Chance Education” and Alternative Trajectories as a Mechanism for the Accumulation of Human Capital. Obrazovaniye I nauka v Rossii: sostoyaniye I potentsial razvitiya: Yezhegodnik: vol. 4. Moscow, 2019: 372–387 (In Russ.).

Social mobility in an increasingly complex society: objective and subjective aspects. Ed. by V.V. Semionova, M.F. Chernysh, P.E. Sushko. Moscow, FCTAS RAS publ., 2019: 512 (In Russ.).

Ballarino G., Bernardi F., Requena M., Schadee H. Persistent Inequalities? Expansion of Education and Class Inequality in Italy and Spain. European Sociological Review. 2008: vol. 25: 1: 123–138.

Bar Haim E., Shavit Y. Expansion and inequality of educational opportunity: A comparative study. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 2013: 31: 22–31.

Bauman Z. Liquid Life. Cambridge (UK); Malden (Ma), Polity, 2005: 224.

Blau P.M. American Occupational Structure. New York, Free Press, 1978: 544.

Breen R., Luijkx R., Muller W., Pollak R. Nonpersistent Inequality in Educational Attainment: Evidence from Eight European Countries. American Journal of Sociology, 2009: vol. 114: 5: 1475–1521.

Collins R. Functional and conflict theories of educational stratification. American Sociological Review. 1971: vol. 36: 1002–1019.

Goldthorpe J.H., Hope K. The Social Grading of Occupations: A New Approach and Scale, Clarendon Press, 1974: 216.

Grummell B. The «second chance» myth: Equality of opportunity in Irish adult education policie. British Journal of Educational Studies, 2007: vol. 55: 2: 182–201.

Grusky D.B., Van Rompaey S.E. The Vertical Scaling of Occupations: Some Cautionary Comments and Reflections. American Journal of Sociology, 1992: vol. 97: 6: 1712–1728.

Haveman R., Smeeding T. The Role of Higher Education in Social Mobility. The Future of Children, 2006: vol. 16: 2: 125–150.

Hope K. A Liberal Theory of Prestige. American Journal of Sociology, 1982: vol. 87: 5: 1011–1031.

Karabel J. Community Colleges and Social Stratification: Harvard Educational Review. 1972: vol. 42: 4: 521–562.

Knapper, C., Cropley, A. Lifelong learning and higher education. London, Kogan page, 1991.

Nash P. The Rise of the Meritocracy, 1870–2033: An Essay on Education and Equality. Michael Young. (London: Thames and Hudson, 1958. 160 p.). History of Education Quarterly, 1961: vol. 1: 4: 40–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/367489

Neelsen J.P. Education and Social Mobility. Comparative Education Review, 1975: vol. 19: 1: 129–143.

Parsons T. An Analytical Approach to the Theory of Social Stratification. American Journal of Sociology, 1940: vol. 45: 6: 841–862.

Richardson C.J. Education and Social Mobility: Changing Conceptions of the Role of the Educational Systems. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 1977: vol. 2: 4: 417–433.

Tuijnman A. Adult education and the quality of life. International Review of Education, 1990: vol. 36: 3: 283–298.

Tuijnman A. Recurrent Education, Earnings, and Well-being. A Fifty-Year Longitudinal Study of a Cohort of Swedish Men. Stockholm Studies in Educational Psychology. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International, 1989: 288.

Young M. D. The Rise of the Meritocracy, 1870–2033: An Essay on Education and Equality. L.: Penguin Books, 1961: 198.