The nature and pace of social changes, global challenges and threats, the constant reproduction of social risks – all of these things speak to the problematic nature of the world’s current social portrait. This allows us to point out that today, despite all of civilization’s achievements, certain problems associated with the social well-being of a person, and society as a whole, remain unresolved. Social well-being is a multifactor construct, which itself is the result of a synthesis of causes and effects, a joining of objective and subjective factors; we are dealing with a systemic phenomenon, the categorization of which is distinguished by various facets and components which determine a person’s social well-being, the degree of public safety and modern value-normative implications. In conjunction these parameters define and bring a person’s social well-being to the forefront of the research and political agenda. The authors of this article insist that the study of the effect which objective processes occurring in society have on social well-being must be conducted in parallel with studying its subjective component, namely – a person’s subjective evaluation of this construct’s various aspects. Aside from that, special practical relevance is attributed to matters concerning the study of issues of social well-being in various social groups and cohorts, as well as within the regional context. Primorsky Krai, being part of the Far Eastern Federal District, possesses a distinct geographical, socio-economic and demographical specificity, while being an object of government strategic interests and goals; this is a territory where a plethora of innovative solutions aimed at stimulating the region’s socio-economic development are being initiated and implemented. Nonetheless, despite the government’s best efforts, the social effectiveness of these measures is not as pronounced as the current situation calls for them to be. The region is still in a state of demographic depression, with there being distinct sector-specific socio-economic and management issues. The article cites data collected by its authors while studying the subjective evaluation of the social well-being of Primorsky Krai’s population. A regional-scale quantitative study was conducted in May of 2019 by means of questionnaire survey (n=780). The results of this study of the population’s satisfaction with various aspects of life are generally favorable, with certain disparities having been recorded based on age and gender.

social well-being, subjective well-being, subjective assessment, satisfaction with life

Aknin, L. B., Dunn E. W., Norton M. I. Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2012: 13: 347–355. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-011-9267-5

Alatartseva E., Barysheva G. Well-being: subjective and objective aspects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015: 166: 36–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.479

Alkire S. Global multidimensional poverty index. Pakistan Development Review, 2015: 54 (4): 287–299.

Allardt E. Having, Loving, Being: An Alternative to the Swedish Model of Welfare Research. In: Quality of Life. Ed. by M. Nussbaum, A. Sen. New York, Oxford University Press, 1993: 88–94.

Better Life Index. OECD Official Web portal. Available at: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/ru/topics/safety-ru [accessed: 05.10.19] (in Russ.).

De Neve J.-E., Diener E., Tay L., Xuereb C. The objective benefits of subjective well-being. World happiness report 2013. Ed. by J. Helliwell, R. Layard, J. Sachs. New York, UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2013: 54–79.

Diener E., Chan M. Y. Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well-Being Contributes to Health and Longevity. Applied psychology: health and well-being, 2011: 3 (1): 1–43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x

Dolan P., Peasgood Т. Measuring Well-being for Public Policy: Preferences or Experiences? Journal of Legal Studies, 2008; 37 (2): 5–31. DOI: 10.1086/595676

Dorn D., Fischer J. A., Kirchgassner G., Sousa-Poza A. Is it culture of democracy? The impact of democracy and culture on happiness. Social Indicators Research, 2007: 82 (3): 505–526. DOI: 10.1007 / s11205-006-9048-4

Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 2005: 89: 997–1019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.003

FOM initiative: studying the well-being of Russians. FOM Official website, 2018. Available at: https://fom.ru/TSennosti/14244 [accessed: 05.12.19] (in Russ.).

Golikov A. A., Gordeev S. S., Davankov A. Yu., Kozlov V. N. Conceptual foundations of the dynamics of well-being of the population in the region. Golikovskie Chteniya = Golikov readings working papers. Chelyabinsk, 2015: 6–10 (In Russ.).

Hausman D., McPherson М. Preference Satisfaction and Welfare Economics. Economics and Philosophy, 2009: 25 (1): 1–25. DOI: 10.1017/S0266267108002253

Hicks S., Tinkler L., Allin P. Measuring Subjective Well-Being and its Potential Role in Policy: Perspectives from the UK Office for National Statistics. Social Indicators Research, 2013: 114: 73–86. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0384

Inglehart R. F., Norris P. The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Understanding Human Security. Scandinavian Political Studies, 2012: 35, 1: 71–94. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.197131

Kostina E. Y., Orlova N. A. The social well-being of the population of the Russian Far East. Oykumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya = Oikumena. Regionalistic Studies, 2016; 2: 61–71 (In Russ.).

Lorenc T., Clayton S., Neary D., Whitehead M., Petticrew M., Thomson H., Cummins S., Sowden A., Renton A. Crime, fear of crime, environment, and mental health and wellbeing: Mapping review of theories and causal pathways. Health and Place, 2012: 18: 757–765. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-496

Maccagnan A., Lewis S., Brown H., Taylor T. Wellbeing and Society: Towards Quantification of the Co-benefits of Wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 2019: 141: 217–243. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-017-1826-7

Popov E. A. Human social well-being in scientific discourse. Sotsiologiya v sovremennom mire: nauka, obrazovanie, tvorchestvo = Sociology in the modern world: science, education, creativity, 2010: 2: 16–23 (In Russ.)

Stiglitz J., Sen A., Fitoussi J. P. Mis-measuring Our Lives Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up. The report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Moscow, Gaidar Institute publ., 2016: 216 (In Russ.).

Vladimirova T. V. The Development of Accumulation and Acceleration Structures of Deviation as a Condition of Public Safety. Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsialnoy Antropologii = The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2012: 2: 129–146 (In Russ.).