The article presents the results of meta-analysis of Russian and foreign scientific research on digital volunteerism. In particular, it shows how it is conceptualized, in which forms it manifests, what distinguishes it from traditional offline volunteerism, how formal structures that deal with volunteer participation adapt to the digitization of their activity, as well as what sort of difficulties are associated with these processes, what are the advantages and restrictions compared to traditional forms of volunteerism in emergency situations, what sort of methodological tools are used to comprehend it, and what sort of gaps are still present in the understanding of this phenomenon. Despite literature lacking a clear definition of digital volunteerism, most authors consider it as voluntary activity which involves an individual spending their spare time helping other people, groups or organizations, all without receiving any direct rewards, but while inevitably using modern information-communication technologies while sitting at home or in any other place beyond the office. On one hand, digital volunteerism’s main features include increased flexibility and the opportunity for large groups of the population to engage in volunteer activity, while on the other hand we have the need for certain well-established technical skills, anonymity, as well as the possibility of providing false information. In terms of functionality, volunteers are divided into those responsible for collecting and analyzing massive streams of data, developers of new digital platforms and applications, and online community administrators. Digital volunteerism issues are examined within such areas of knowledge as citizen science, cooperative computerized work activity, crisis information science, crisis communications etc. Digital volunteerism, which is located on an interdisciplinary divide, is interpreted through various theoretical frameworks, in particular through digital humanitaristics, network approaches and Castells’ theory, the collective production theory, the “common use digital economy” approach, the concept of indirect activity and digital activism. The possibilities and restrictions of these approaches in regards to the Russian context create an opportunity to analyze empirical research data.

digital volunteering, information and communication technologies, digital humanism, social networks, crowdsourcing, mapping, voluntary geographical information, emergency

Ackermann K., Manatschal A. Online volunteering as a means to overcome unequal participation? The profiles of online and offline volunteers compared. New media and society, 2018: 20 (12): 4453–4472. DOI: 10.1177/1461444818775698

Albuquerque J., Eckle M., Herfort B., Zipf A. Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster risk management and improving urban resilience: an overview of the lessons learned. In: European Handbook of Crowdsourced Geographic Information. Ed. by C. Capineri. London, Ubiquity Press, 2016: 309–321. DOI: 10.5334/bax.w

Alford J. Engaging public sector clients: from service-delivery to co-production. London, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2009: 272.

Amichai-Hamburger Y. Potential and promise of online volunteering. Computers in Human Behavior, 2008: 24: 544–562.

Asmolov G. Crowdsourcing and the folksonomy of emergency response: The construction of a mediated subject. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 2015: 6 (2): 155–178. DOI: 10.1386/iscc.6.2.155_1

Basheva O.A. Specificity of urban catastrophe as an example of a fire at the INION RAS. Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 11: Sotsiologija = Social Sciences and Humanities. National and Foreign Literature. Ser. 11: Sociology., 2018: 2: 99–116 (In Russ.).

Baldassarri D., Diani М. The integrative power of civic networks. American journal of sociology. Chicago (IL), 2007: 113 (3): 735–780.

Bloom H. Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind from the Big Bang to the 21^th Century. London, Wiley, 2000: 681.

Capelo L, Chang N., Verity A. Guidance for collaborating with volunteer and technical communities. Digital Humanitarian Network, 2012: 32.

Castells M. Communication, Power and Counter-Power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication, 2007: 1: 238–266.

Chernobrov D. Digital Volunteer Networks and Humanitarian Crisis Reporting. Digital Journalism, 2018: 6 (7): 928–944.

Chuchkevich M.M. What is a network organization? Moscow: IS RAS publ., 1999: 54 (In Russ.).

Cravens J. Virtual volunteering: online volunteers providing assistance to human service agencies. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 2000: 17 (2–3):119–136.

Crowley J. Connecting Grassroots and Government for Disaster Response. Washington (DC), Commons Lab, Wilson Center, 2013: 69.

Demakova K., Makoveckaja S., Skrjakova E. Digital activism: new media, civic applications and technology communities as the basis for socio-political changes. Pro et Contra, 2014: May – August rel.: 148–163 (In Russ.)

Engeström Y. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki, Orienta-Konsultit Oy, 1987: 269.

Fritz C., Mathewson J. Convergence behavior in disasters. National Research Council Disaster Study (no 9). Washington (DC), National Academy of Science, 1957: 101.

Golbreikh V.B. Members of environmental groups in social media: digital participation and interests. Peterburgskaja sociologija segodnia = Petersburg Sociology Today, 2018: 9: 91–119 (In Russ.).

Goldman J., Shilton K., Burke J. Estrin D., Hansen M., Ramanathan N. et al. Participatory sensing: A citizen powered approach to illuminating the patterns that shape our world. Washington (DC), Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, 2009: 20.

Goodchild M.F., Glennon J.A. Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2010: 3(3): 231–241.

Goodchild M.F. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 2007: 69 (4): 211–221.

Hargittai E. Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “Net Generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 2010: 80 (1): 92–113.

Haworth B., Bruce E. A review of volunteered geographic information for disaster management. Geog Compass, 2015: 9 (5): 237–250.

Horita F. E. A., de Albuquerque J. P., Degrossi L. C., Mendiondo E. M., Ueyama J. Development of a spatial decision support system for flood risk management in Brazil that combines volunteered geographic information with wireless sensor networks. Computers & Geosciences, 2015: 80: 84–94.

Howe J. Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business. New York, Three Rivers Press, 2009: 320.

Hughes A.L., Palen L. Twitter Adoption and Use in Mass Convergence and Emergency Events. Proceedings of the Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM). Gothenburg (Sweden), ISCRAM, 2009: 10.

Hughes A. L., Tapia A. H. Social Media in Crisis: When Professional Responders Meet Digital Volunteers. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2015: 12 (3): 679–706.

Karray F., Alemzadeh M., Saleh J. A., Arab M. N. Human-Computer Interaction: Overview on State of the Art. International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems, 2008: 1 (1): 137–159.

Kaufhold M.-A., Reuter C. The Self-Organization of Digital Volunteers across Social Media: The Case of the 2013 European Floods in Germany. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2014: 13 (1): 137–166. DOI: 10.1515/jhsem-2015-0063

Liu S. Crisis crowdsourcing framework: designing strategic configurations of crowdsourcing for the emergency management domain. Comput. Support. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2014: 23 (4): 389–443.

Madianou M. Digital Inequality and Second-Order Disasters: Social Media in the Typhoon Haiyan Recovery, Social Media+Society, 2015: 1 (2): 1–11. DOI: 10.1177/2056305115603386

Making a Difference: Virtual Volunteer Opportunities. Southeastern University Official website, 2016. Available at: https://online.seu.edu/articles/virtual-volunteer-opportunities [accessed 05.01.20].

Malizia A., Bellucci A., Diaz P.P. et al. eStorys: a visual storyboard system supporting backchannel communication for emergencies. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 2011: 22 (2): 150–169.

Meier P. Digital Humanitarians: How Big Data Is Changing the Face of Humanitarian Response. New York, CRC Press, 2015: 259.

Meier P. Human computation for disaster response. In: Handbook of Human Computation, New York, Springer, 2013: 95–104.

Mills K.L. Computer-supported cooperative work challenges. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 2003: 678–684.

Mukherjee D. Participation of older adults in virtual volunteering: a qualitative analysis. Ageing International, 2011; 36 (2): 253–266.

Murthy D., Longwell S. Twitter and disasters: The uses of Twitter in the 2010 Pakistan floods. Information, Communication & Society, 2013: 16: 837–855.

Norris W. Digital humanitarians: citizen journalists on the virtual front line of natural and human-caused disasters. Journalism Practice, 2016: 11 (2-3): 213–228.

OCHA. Hashtag Standards for Emergencies. OCHA Policy and Studies Series, 2014: 16.

Palen L., Vieweg S., Sutton J., Liu S. B., Hughes A. Crisis Informatics: Studying Crisis in a Networked World. Third International Conference on e-Social Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2007 Oct. 7–9: 10.

Park C. H., Johnston E. W. A framework for analyzing digital volunteer contributions in emergent crisis response efforts. New media and society, 2017: 19 (8): 1308–1327.

Perrow Ch. The Normal Accidents. Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York, Basic Books, 1984: 386.

Ridings C. M., Gefen D. Virtual community attraction: why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2004: 10 (1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00229.x/full

Riabchenko N. A., Gnedash N. A. Digital activism: new media, civic applications and technology communities as the basis for socio-political change. In: Sbornik nauchnyh statey XIX Obedinennoy konferencii «Internet i sovremennoe obshhestvo» = Conference working papers « Internet and Modern Society». Saint-Petersburg: SPb NRU ITMO publ., 2016: 48–55 (In Russ.)

Roberts N. C. Beyond smokestacks and silos: open-source, web-enabled coordination in organizations and networks. Public Administration Review, 2011: 71 (5): 677–693.

Rocha R., Widera A., van den Berg R. P., de Albuquerque J. P., Helingrath B. Improving the Involvement of Digital Volunteers in Disaster Management. In: Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Heidelberg, Springer, Cham, 2017: 501: 214–224.

Roche S., Propeck-Zimmermann E., Mericskay B. GeoWeb and crisis management: issues and perspectives of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 2011: 78 (1): 21–40.

Rodriguez H. Rising to the challenges of a catastrophe: the emergent and prosocial behavior following Hurricane Katrina. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2006: 604 (1): 82–101.

Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000: 25 (1): 54–67.

Shklovski I., Burke M., Kraut R., Kiesler S. Technology adoption and use in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. American Behavioral Scientist, 2010: 53: 1228–1246.

Starbird K., Palen L. Voluntweeters: Self-Organizing by Digital Volunteers in Times of Crisis. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). Vancouver (Canada), ACM-Press, 2011: 1071–1080.

Strasser B., Baudry J., Sanchez G., Tancoigne E. «Citizen Science»? Rethinking Science and Public Participation. Science and Technology Studies, 2018: 32 (2): 52–76.

The Handbook of Crisis Communication. Ed. by W. T. Coombs, S. J. Holladay. Hoboken (NJ), Wiley-Blackwell, 2009: 737.

Usacheva O. A. The Internet as a new platform for civic self-organization. In: Sotsial'nye seti i virtual'nye setevye soobschestva = Social Networks and Virtual Network Communities. Moscow: ISISS RAS publ., 2012: 264–280 (In Russ.).

Verba S., Schlozman K. L., Brady H. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 1995: 640.

Waldman S., Kaminska K. Connecting emergency management organizations with digitally enabled emergent volunteering: literature review and best practices. Defence Research and Development Canada, 2015: 50.

Wilson J. Volunteerism research: a review essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2012: 41 (2): 176–212.

Xenos M., Vromen A., Loader B.D. The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication and Society, 2014: 17 (2): 151–167.

Yanitsky O. N. Environmental catastrophes: structural and functional analysis. IS RAS Official website, 2013. Available at: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=2794 [accessed 29.01.20] (In Russ.).

Yuan W., Guan D., Huh E. et al. Harness human sensor networks for situational awareness in disaster reliefs: a survey. IETE Technical Review, 2013: 30 (3): 240–247.

Zook M., Graham M., Shelton T., Gorman S. Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: a case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Med Health Policy, 2010: 2 (7): 33.