Research ArticleВалентин В Немировский Doctor of Sociology, Professor, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia valnemirov@mail.ruORCID ID=0000-0002-4076-465XАнна А Мальцева Doctor of Sociology, Associate professor, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia annamaltseva@rambler.ruORCID ID=0000-0003-1322-6255Competition as a value of working youth in the Tyumen region. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2019. Vol. 10. No. 4. P. 187-201Дата поступления статьи: 15.10.2019Topic: Sociology of Youth: Values and Their FormationFor citation: Немировский В. Г., Мальцева А. В. Competition as a value of working youth in the Tyumen region. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2019. Vol. 10. No. 4. P. 187-201DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2019.31.4.615Текст статьиAbstractThe purpose of this article is to analyze working youth’s attitudes towards competition as one of the most essential merits in modern Russian society. Working youth’s value orientations had developed during a time when market economy was already prevalent in Russian society, with competition playing a vital role in its operation. However, in recent years, youth attitudes towards competition have hardly even been studied. A social constructivist approach was used as the theoretical-methodological foundation for this article. The empirical base for this study consists of a questionnaire survey of Tyumen province’s working youth (N = 956), employed at 20 organizations in the cities of Tyumen, Tobolsk and Ishim. This article considers how young people evaluate the concept of “competition” using the semantic differential method aided by ten specially constructed antinomic scales, as well as their competitive ability, determined by means of self-assessment. On a verbal level, respondents predominantly regard competition as something important, but immoral, uncomfortable and unpleasant. A contradiction became apparent between verbal evaluations of the concept of “competition” and the results attained by means of factor analysis. It was determined that a more important factor describes the complete internalization of competition on behalf of respondents as one of the most important merits in modern life, as its approval as a mechanism for achieving success in life. A significantly less important factor expressed a variable which describes a positive attitude among working youth towards competition, primarily as something beneficial, essential and effective. Also used were methods such as cluster and correlation analysis. In particular, the article demonstrates correlations between evaluations on varying scales of semantic differentiation and the self-assessments of competitive respondents. It was determined those partaking most effectively in competition were those young men and women who do not view competition in terms of moral principles, and who are not preoccupied with honesty when it comes to competing. When conducting further research, it would seem reasonable to analyze the place which competition occupies in the general structure of the basic values of modern working youth.Keywordscompetition as a value, working youth, society of trauma, «semantic differential»ReferencesBhawsar Р., Chattopadhyay U. Competitiveness: Review, Reflections and Directions. Global Business Review, 2015;16 (4): 665–679. DOI: 10.1177/0972150915581115 Buser T., Niederle M., Oosterbeek H. Gender, Competitiveness and Career Choices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2014; 129 (3): 1409–1447. DOI:10.1093/qje/qju009 De Paola М., Ponzo М, Scoppa V. Gender Differences in Attitudes Towards Competition: Evidence from the Italian Scientific Qualification. CSEF – Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance. Department of economics – University of Naples, 2015; Working paper 391: 28. Deutsch M. Cooperation and competition. In: The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and practice. Ed. by M. Deutsch, P.T. Coleman, E.C. Marcus. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006: 23–42. Gneezy U., Niederle M., Rustichini A. Performance in competitive environments: gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003; 118: 1049–1074. DOI: 10.1162/00335530360698496 Gorshkov M.K., Sheregi F.E. Youth of Russia: sociological portrait. Moscow: CSFM publ., 2010: 502 (In Russ.). Gudkov L.D., Dubin B.V., Zorkaya N.A. Youth of Russia. Moscow: Moscow school of political studies, 2011: 96 (In Russ.). Hayward R. D., Kemmelmeier M. How competition is viewed across cultures: a test of four theories. Cross-Cultural Research, 2007; 41: 364–395. DOI: 10.1177/1069397107306529 Jaworek M. Cooperation and competition as elements of individual and organizational value system among middle top managers – pilot study. In: Competition and Cooperation in the Management Theory and Practice. Ed. by P. Jedynak. Warsaw: Jagiellonian University Press, 2014: 211–220. Klyueva О. Competitiveness of personality as a psychological phenomenon: The content of the construct and its typology. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2016; vol. 9, 2: 151 –166. (In Russ.). Nemirovskiy V.G., Nemirovskaya A.V. Social Competitiveness: Chances for Success among Youth and Adults. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal = Sociological Journal, 2018; vol. 24 (2): 135 – 149. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2018.24.2.5848 (In Russ.). Olczyk М.A. Systematic Retrieval of International Competitiveness Literature: a Bibliometric Study. Eurasian Economic Review, 2016; vol. 6, 3: 429 - 457. (In Russ.). Petrov A.V. Value preferences of the young: diagnosis and trends. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 2008; 2: 83–90 (In Russ.). Radaev V.V. Competition as a socially embedded process. In: Competition and competition policies. Ed. by S.B. Avdasheva. Moscow: SU HSE publ., 2008: 59–80 (In Russ.). Reznik S., Konovalova E., Sochilova A. Competitive orientation and competitiveness of student youth of Russia. Experience, problems, prospects. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2018: 292 (In Russ.). Shafranov-Кutsev G.F., Efimova G.Z. Competitiveness of the working youth on the basis of self-assessment (according to survey in the Tyumen Region). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 2018; 8: 102–107. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250000765-4 (In Russ.). Shmeliov A.G. Competition as a Metacategory of modern Psychology. Part 1. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series Psychology, 2014; 7; 3: 105–116 (In Russ.). Shmeliov A.G. Competition as a Metacategory of modern Psychology. Part 2. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series Psychology, 2014; 7; 4: 97–106 (In Russ.). Social activity of Russian youth. Analytical review of results of conducted sociological researches, 2008. Zircon Research group Official website. Available at: http://www.zircon.ru/upload/iblock/3a3/081117.pdf (accessed 23.09.19) (In Russ.). Toschenko Zh. T. Paradigms as the methodological strategies in sociology. Gumanitariy Youga Rossii = Humanities of the South of Russia, 2016; 17; 1: 19–36 (In Russ.). Toshchenko Zh.T. Precariat: from Protoclass to a New Class. Moscow: Nauka, 2018: 350 (In Russ.). Wang H., Wang L. and Liu С. Employee Competitive Attitude and Competitive Behavior Promote Job-Crafting and Performance: A Two-Component Dynamic Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018; 9: 2223. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02223 Werron T. Why do we believe in competition? A historical-sociological view of competition as an institutionalized modern imaginary. Distinction: Journal of Social Theory. A sociology of competition, 2015; vol. 16, 2: 186–210. DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2015.1049190Content Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2019. Vol. 10. No. 4