This article examines shifts when it comes to employment among Russians during the financial-economic crisis years of 2014-2016, as well as during the years 2017-2018, which Russian scientists have already named the “period of negative post-crisis stabilization”. This article for the most part confirms said thesis. Despite obvious success in certain aspects (for example, unemployment around Russia has been kept at an unusually low level, while the wage gap between various regions has somewhat smoothened out in 2018 due to a decrease in income among those who live in the capital cities), several critical employment indicators show that our country has not yet recovered from the crisis. Alienation of villages is what’s the most disturbing circumstance, manifesting in the form of not only unusually high unemployment rates (over five times higher than that of the capital cities), but also villagers having to deal with injustice when it comes to their labor – delayed payment en masse, “grey” salaries and authoritarian local management. There’s also the matter of large-scale employment instability, and the enduring high risk of unemployment among younger people, especially those who perform simple physical labor. Yet another indicator would be an increase in settlement inequalities when it comes to distributing individual income within professional groups. When it comes to the capital cities, mainly managers have been negatively affected by the crisis (as a result of optimizing funding for administrations); as for regional and district center cities, mostly professionals are facing trouble due to the crisis (since there is a limited amount of “worthwhile” job offers out there). Additionally there are certain fundamental differences in types of employment and job opportunities between the capital cities and the regions, with said differences not necessarily being a consequence of the crisis itself. For example, this article concludes that a gradual transformation of Russian regional center cities into a “transfer periphery” is occurring, due to the fact that, since the early 2000’s, the amount of economically inactive people (mostly unemployed elderly folk) within them has increased twofold. The empirical basis for this study consists of sample statistics data, collected from “waves” of a national monitoring study conducted in 2014-2018 by the Federal Center for Sociological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

employment, work situation, occupational structure, residential inequalities, crisis, economy recovery, Russia.

Anikin V. A. Chelovecheskiy capital v post-krizisnoy Rossii: sostoyaniye i otdacha [Human Capital in Post-Crisis Russia: Status and Impact]. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2018, vol. 10, no 2, pp. 90–117. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2018.10.2.090-117 (in Russ.).

Anikin V. A. Crisis and Russian National Identity. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2016, vol. 135, no 5, pp. 203–232.

Anikin V. A. The modernization potential of the professional structure of the employed population of Russia. Society and Economy, 2011, no 11–12, pp. 35–64.

Dvadtsat' pyat' let sotsial'nykh transformatsiy v otsenkakh i suzhdeniyakh rossiyan: opyt sotsiologicheskogo analiza [Twenty-five years of social transformations in the assessments and judgments of Russians: evidence from the sociological analysis]. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, V. V. Petukhov. Moscow, Ves' Mir, 2018. 384 p. (in Russ.).

Gallie D. Patterns of skill change: upskilling, deskilling or the polarization of skills? Work, Employment & Society, 1991, Vol. 5, no 3, pp. 319–351.

Grishina E.E. and oth. Analiz prichin i faktorov neravenstva zarabotnykh plat v Rossii [Analysis of the causes and factors of wage inequality in Russia]. Moscow, RANEPA publ., 2016. 176 p. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2760347 (in Russ.).

Kohn M. Class and conformity: A study in values. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989. 476 p.

Rossiyskiy rynok truda: tendentsii, instituty, strukturnyye izmeneniya [The Russian labor market: trends, institutions, structural changes]. Ed. by V. E. Gimpel'son, R. I. Kapeliushnikov, S. Yu. Roshchin. Moscow, CSR, 2017. 148 p. (in Russ.).

Shkaratan O. I. Gorodskaya territorial'naya obshchnost' i eyo vosproizvodstvo [Urban territorial community and its reproduction. Ethnosocial problems of the city]. Etnosotsial'nyye problemy goroda. Ed. by O. I. Shkaratan. Moscow, Nauka, 1986, pp. 12–33 (in Russ.).

Shkaratan O. I., Yastrebov G. A. Sotsial'no-professional'naya struktura i eyo vosproizvodstvo v sovremennoy Rossii: predvaritel'nyye itogi predstavitel'nogo oprosa economicheski aktivnogo naseleniya Rossii 2006 g. [Occupational structure and its reproduction in contemporary Russia: preliminary results of a representative 2006 survey of the economically active population of Russia]. Preprint WP7/2007/02. Seriya WP7 (Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo vybora). Moscow, SU HSE publ., 2007 (in Russ.).

Sredniy klass v sovremennoy Rossii. Opyt mnogoletnikh issledovaniy [The Middle class in contemporary Russia. Evidence from longitudinal studies]. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, N. E. Tikhonova. Moscow, Ves’ Mir, 2016. 304 p. (in Russ.).

Stolitsy i regiony v sovremennoy Rossii: mify i real'nost' piatnadtsat' let spustia [Capitals and regions in contemporary Russia: myths and reality fifteen years later]. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, N. E. Tikhonova. Moscow, Ves' Mir, 2018. 312 p. (in Russ.).