This article examines peculiarities when it comes to the distribution of economic statuses among the working population of Russia, as well as the interconnections of said statuses with various factors which affect an individual’s economic prosperity. Presented is a method for structuring a certain index, the purpose of which is to measure objective parameters of the economic status of modern Russia’s working population. In developing this methodology the author adheres to the neo-Weberian tradition, assuming that an individual’s economic status consists of a set of objective indexes which can be measured quantitatively. In this case these characteristics are as follows: income, the possession of additional real estate aside from the main place of residence, as well as the possession of savings. It is shown that the economic status of the population’s majority has a clearly pronounced “norm”, which is relatively low-level, together with the fact that the possession of additional economic resources such as real estate tends to lower Russian people’s motivation when it comes to increasing their current level of income. Also presented is a series of conclusions which have to do with the specifics of the economic status of Russia’s working people from various educational and professional groups. A certain hypothesis is brought forward and validated, concerning the insignificant effect of educational resource and professional affiliation on the economic status of common Russians. Examined is the effect of employment form on economic status scale indexes, as well as peculiarities when it comes to the distribution of its parameters among age groups. The following conclusion is made: within each successive age cohort there is a decrease in the amount of workers with an economic status corresponding to the Russian “norm”, as well as the amount of those workers whose status exceeds said norm. The objective parameters of Russian people’s economic status are compared with their subjective evaluation of said status. Given the presence of a considerable discrepancy between them, the author comes to the conclusion that objective parameters are not consistent with subjective evaluation. Data from the 24^th wave of the yearly RLMS-HSE survey, conducted at the end of 2015, was used as an empirical base for analysis.

economic status, economic resource, status consistency, human capital, education, professional affiliation.

Anikin V. A., Lezhnina J. P., Mareeva S. V., Slobodenyuk E. D., Tikhonova N. E. Income Stratification: Key Approaches and Their Application to Russia, 2016. The Higher Sсhool of Economics Official website. URL: https://www.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/lib/data/access/ram/ticket/70/151550862258ce11c0f37b9c1b59560cdf8b54e231/02PSP2016.pdf [date of visit: 21.10.2017].

Becker G. Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago, University of Chicago press, 2009. 412 p.

Beliaeva L. A. Materialnoe neravenstvo v Rossii. Realnost i tendencii [Material Inequality in Russia. Reality and Trends].Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2007, no. 11, pp. 29–41 (in Russ.).

Chernysh M. F. Paradigmalnye osnovanija analiza socialnogo neravenstva v perehodnom obschestve [Sociological paradigms and analysis of inequality in a transition society].Sotsiologichesky zhurnal, 2012, no. 2, pp. 23–52 (in Russ.)

Duesenberry J. S. Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior. Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 1949. 128 p.

Gorshkov M. K. Obschestvennye neravenstva kak object sociologicheskogo analiza [Social inequalities as an object of sociological analysis]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2014, no. 7, pp. 20–31 (in Russ.).

Grusky D. The Past, Present, and Future of Social Inequality, 2001. The Web version. URL: http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~khsu/mobile/sup2.pdf [date of visit 21.10.2017].

Kolennikova N. D. Osobennosti vlastnogo statusa zaniatogo naselenija Rossii [Characteristics of the power status of employed population in contemporary Russia].Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2017, no. 5, pp. 214–232. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2017.5.12 (in Russ.).

Mincer J. On-the-job training: Costs, returns, and some implications. The Journal of political economy, 1962, vol. 70 (5), pp. 50–79.

Ovcharova L. N. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy izmerenija bednosti [Theoretical and methodological framework poverty measurement].SREPO, 2012, no. 16, pp. 15–38 (in Russ.).

Pigu A. S. Economicheskaja teorija blagosostojanija [The Economics of Welfare]. Moscow, Progress, 1985, vol. 1. 511 p. (in Russ.)

Shkaratan O. I. Vosproizvodstvo socialno-ecnomicheskogo neravenstva v postsovetskoy Rossii: dinamika urovnia zhizni i polozhenie socialnyh nizov [Reproduction of Socioeconomic Inequality in Post-Soviet Russia: Welfare Dynamics and the Situation of the Lower Strata]. Mir Rossii, 2008, no. 4, pp. 60–89 (in Russ.).

Tihonova N. E. Sotsialnaya stratifikaciya v sovremennoy Rossii: opyt empiricheskogo analiza [Social stratification in contemporary Russia: an empirical evidence]. Moscow, IS RAS publ., 2007. 320 p. (in Russ.).

Tihonova N. E. Sotsialnaya struktura Rossii: teorii i realnost [Social structure of Russia: theory and reality]. Moscow, Novy Khronograf, IS RAS publ., 2014. 408 p. (in Russ.).

Toschenko J. T. Economicheskoe soznanie i povedenie rossijan: protivorechija i paradoxy. 25 let spustia [Economic consciousness and behavior after a quarter of century (25 years later)]. Intelros. The Web journal. Release 2014. URL: http://www.intelros.ru/readroom/alternativi/a1-2014/23391-ekonomicheskoe-soznanie-i-povedenie-rossiyan-protivorechiya-i-paradoksy-25-let-spustya.html [date of visit: 21.10.2017] (in Russ.).