This article focuses on issues such as the emergence and existence of a collective consciousness among the Soviet engineering/technical intellectuals during the period of real socialism, based on knowledge of the past embodied in the memories of those who represent this group. The analysis utilizes E. Durkheim’s ideas about collective consciousness. This man of science developed the concept of collective or common consciousness, tying it to the idea of “organic solidarity”, which can be interpreted as the ethos of a certain social group, as well as knowledge about social reality and about the place which a certain group occupies within it, with said knowledge producing collective identity. This article attempts to reconstruct certain elements of the consciousness of the Soviet engineering/technical intellectuals group based on analyzing the remaining memories of its representatives, as well as the ETW (engineering technical workers) discourse concept proposed by M. Lipovitsky, which characterizes forms of group consciousness among the said group. The whole point of the ETW discourse, according to M. Lipovitsky, is spontaneous positivism and progressism, confidence in the power of facts, as well as denying complicated polyphonic prisms when it comes to cultivating a mock form of irony given a lack of critical self-reflection. This work examines the issues of the social and professional status of the group of Soviet engineering/technical intellectuals, as well as its position in the social structure of Soviet society. In order to accomplish this, studies by Soviet sociologists, dedicated to engineering personnel, are utilized. It is stated that the professionalism of engineering/technical intellectuals was based on the level of education that they received, as well as the state’s need for a technocratic class, which would make the USSR competitive in defense and civil spheres. The professional independence of various sub-groups of the engineering/technical intellectuals was not equal, and it depended on the industrial affiliation of the organization where certain specialists were at work. Also discussed are certain professional culture characteristics of this group, including technocratic thinking, rationalism, and a critical outlook on the late Soviet period. It is shown that the memories of Soviet engineers can somewhat reveal the life and professional world of this group, they do not, however, indicate the existence of several different professional environments and forms of collective consciousness within it, which are still waiting for their researchers. Search and discussion is the purpose of this text.

engineering and technical intelligentsia, professions, scientific and technical progress, ITR-discourse, collective conscious.

Boltanski L., Teveno L. Kritika i obosnovanie spravedlivosti. Ocherki sotziologii gradov [Criticism and Substantation of Justice. Essays in Sociology of Cities]. Moscow, NLO publ., 2013. 576 p.

Brown K. Plutopia: Nuclear Families, Atomic Cities, and the Great Soviet and American Plutonium Disasters. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. 416 p.

Durkheim E. O razdelenii obschestvennogo truda [On social division of labor]. Moscow, Kanon, 1996. 576 p.

Gerovitch S. Soviet Space Mythologies: Public Images, Private Memories, and the Making of a Cultural Identity. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015. 305 p.

Gerovitch S. Voices of the Soviet Space Program: Cosmonauts, Soldiers, and Engineers Who Took the USSR into Space. NY, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 296 p.

Gorbachiov M.S. O sozyive ocherednogo XXVII s'ezda KPSS i zadachah, svyazannykh s ego podgotovkoy i provedeniem [On the Convening of the Next XXVII Congress of the CPSU and the Tasks Related to its Preparation and Conduct]. Materialy Plenuma Tzentralnogo komiteta KPSS. 23.04.1985. Moscow, Politizdat, 1985. Pp. 5‑29.

Gudkov L. D. «Sovetskiy chelovek» v sotsiologii Yuriya Levady [‘Soviet man’in the sociology by Yuri Levada]. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost, 2007, no 6, pp. 16-30.

Josephson P. R. New Atlantis Revisited: Akademgorodok, the Siberian City of Science. Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press, 1997. 351 p.

Klassy, sotzialnyie sloi i gruppyi v SSSR [Social classes, social layers and groups in USSR]. Ed. by C. A. Stepanian, V.S. Semionov. Moscow, Nauka, 1968. 279 p.

Kryshtanovskaya O. V. Inzhenery. Stanovlenie i razvitie professionalnoy gruppy.[Engineers.The genesis and the development of professional group] Moscow, Nauka, 1989. 144 p.

Kubik J. On Variations of Soviet-Type Modernity: Why Poland Did Not Have Its Own ITR Progressives. Ab Imperio, 2013, no 1, pp. 195‑201.

Kugel S.A., Nikandrov O.M. Molodye inzheneryi. Moscow, Mysl, 1971. 216 p.

Lenin V. I. Doklad «Nashe vneshnee i vnutrennee polozhenie i zadachi partii» na Moskovskoy gubernskoy konferentsii RKP(b) 1920 goda [“Our external and internal situation and the tasks of the Party" report at the Moscow Gubernia Conference of the RCP (b) 1920]. Lenin V. I. Polnoe Sobranie Sochineniy. Vol. 42. Moscow, Politizdat, 1920. 647 p.

Lipovetsky M. «I bezdna ITR…» [And abyss of Engineers and Technical Workers]. Openspace (the Web journal), 2010. URL: http://os.colta.ru/projects/13073/details/17365/?expand=yes#expand [date of visit: 15.06.2016].

Lipovetsky M. Clarifying Positions. Ab Imperio, 2013, no 1, pp. 208‑219.

Lipovetzky M. Traektorii ITR-diskursa [Trajectories of Engineers and Technical Workers Discourse]. Neprikosnovennyiy zapas, 2010, no 6 (74), p. 213.

Pivovarov Y. G. Primorskoe CKB. Vospominaniya inzhenera [Engineering Bureau Primorskoe. Engineer`s memories]. 2014. URL: http://memoclub.ru/2014/11/primorskoe-tskb-vospominaniya-inzhenera [date of visit: 15.06.2016].

Razuvalova A. Pisateli – «derevenschiki»: literatura i konservativnaya ideologiya 1970-kh gg. [“Countryside’s” Writers: the Literature and Conservative Ideology of 1970th). Moscow, NLO, 2015. 616 p.

Ryzhikov A. L. Vperedi – proshloe [Ahead is the Past]. Ryazan, 2010. 803 с.p.

Savrey V. Inzhenernyie memo [Engineers Memo]. Zapiski multimaternogo studenta. Vospominaniya vyipusknikov BGTU im D.F. Ustinova («Voenmekha»). Voenmekh university unofficial website. 2010. URL: http://wiki.voenmeh.com/memo.php?part=0 [date of visit: 15.06.2016].

Schmid S. D. Organizational Culture and Professional Identities in the Soviet Nuclear Power Industry. Osiris, 2008, vol. 23, no 1: Intelligentsia Science: The Russian Century, 1860‑1960, pp. 82‑111.

Sotzialno-psihologichesky portret inzhenera. Po materialam obsledovaniya inzhenerov leningradskikh proektno-konstruktorskih organizatsiy [Social-psychological Portrait of Engineers. On Materials of the Observation of Applied Construction Organizations of Leningrad]. Ed. by V. A.Yadov. Moscow, Mysl, 1977. 131 p.

Sovetsky prostoy chelovek: opyt sotzialnogo portreta na rubezhe 1990-x [Soviet Ordinary Man: the Experience of Social Portrait on the Eve of 90th]. Ed. by Y.A. Levada. Moscow, Mirovoy okean publ., 1993. 300 p.

Soviet Society in the Era of Late Socialism, 1964‑1985. Ed. by N. Klumbyte, G. Sharafutdinova. Plyomouth, Lexington Books, 2014. 260 p.

Tamas P. Was the soviet engineer so unique? Ab Imperio, 2013, no 1, pp. 189‑194.

Terentiev Y. K. Kadrovyiy pustyr Strany Sovetov: Zapiski inzhenera [The Cadres’ Desert of the Soviet Country: Engineers Notes]. Saint-Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya, 2009. 234 p.

Vasilieva Z. 1960-e i razvitie massovoy kultury: zametki o sovetskom variante modernosti [1960^th and the Development of the Mass Culture: Essays about Soviet Version of the Modernity]. Ab Imperio, 2013, no 1, pp. 159‑174.

Vlasova L. V. Vospominaniya inzhenera-naladchika sovetskoy EVM "Ural-1" [Memories of the Soviet Engineer of Computer Mainframe “URAL ‑ 1”]. Moscow, 2009. 150 p.

Yurchak A. Eto bylo navsegda, poka ne konchilos. Poslednee sovetskoe pokolenie. [Everything Was Forever Until It Finished. Last Soviet Generation]. Moscow, NLO publ., 2014. 664 p.