Research ArticlePolina M. Kozyreva, Doctor of Sociology first deputy director, , Doctor of Sociological Sciences, First Deputy Director of the Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia; Head of the Center for Longitudinal Studies at the Institute for Social Policy, HSE University, Moscow, Russiamailto: pkozyreva@isras.ruAleksander I. Smirnov, Doctor of Sociology main researcher, , Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Leading Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russiamailto: smir_al@bk.ruSocial Security for Groups of Russians with Average Income. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2016. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 94-120This Article is downloaded: 334 times Topic: Social Well-BeingFor citation: Kozyreva P. M., Smirnov A. I. Social Security for Groups of Russians with Average Income. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2016. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 94-120DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2016.19.4.436Текст статьиAbstractThis article analyzes issues regarding social security for Russians with average income, and their ability to stand up to the threats and dangers of a society in crisis. The analysis is based on data from the “Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey of HSE (RLMS-HSE)”. The analysis revealed that the deteriorating financial status of the Russian people, which occurred after the country fell into a series of economic crisis, has lead to the high-income segment serious thinning out, together with a significant expansion of groups with average income. Meanwhile each group, regardless of financial status, demonstrated a considerable misalignment when it comes to the objective and subjective financial position of those surveyed. Worsening conditions, as well a decrease in life-quality for segments of the population with average income, was indicated by a growing dissatisfaction among the people with their material status and with life in general, them increasingly becoming concerned with employment issues and fearing unemployment, as well as their growing anxiety and ever worsening assessments of their life prospects. The main reasons for decreasing social security of those segments of the population with average income were found to be a decline in real income, decreasing availability of various monetary and non-monetary sources of income, as well as less access to social benefits and social services. Employers more frequently resorting to unconventional forms of behavior on the labor market – which help businesses to overcome the crisis with minimal losses and to limit the increase of unemployment (administrative leaves, working on a shortened schedule, salary delays, “hidden” remuneration etc.) – has lead to significantly more violations of the rights of laborers with low or average income. The amount of people among them who are working without officially registering their labor relations has increased. However, despite the development of these and many other negative tendencies, the situation when it comes to the social security of those groups with average income does not seem to be catastrophic.Keywordsincome, social security, security threats, living standards, social health, social welfare, social benefits and guarantees, economic crisis.ReferencesAlioshina M. V. Social’naja splochionnost’: konceptualizacija poniatija i sociokul’turnye realii [Social Cohesion: Conceptualisation of the Concept and Socio-Cultural Realities]. Moscow, Variant, 2013. 216 p. Chernikova S. A., Cherdancev V. P., Vshivkova G. A. Sovremennye problemy social’noy bezopasnosti [Modern Social Security Issues]. Basic Research, 2015, no 11 (part 4), pp. 836–838. Dohody i social’nye uslugi: neravenstvo, ujazvimost’, bednost’ [Income and Social Services: Inequality, Vulnerability, Poverty]. Ed. By T. N. Ovcharova. Moscow, SU HSE publ., 2005. 348 p. Gorshkov M. K. Rossiyskoe obschestvo kak ono est’: (opyt sociologicheskoy diagnostiki) [Russian Society as it is: (Experience of Sociological Diagnosis)]. Moscow, Novy khronograf, 2011. 672 p. Ibragimova D. H. and oth. Formirovanie ozhidany bezraboticy i ih vlijanie na ekonomicheskoe povedenie naselenija [Formation of Unemployment Expectations and Their Impact on the Economic Behavior of the Population]. Social’naja politika: realii XXI veka. Moscow, Nezavisimy institut social’noy politiki, 2004, pp. 134–159. Kapeliushnikov R. I. Rossiysky rynok truda: adaptacija bez restrukturizacii [Russian Labor Market: Adaptation without Restructuring]. Moscow, SU HSE publ., 2001. 309 p. Kuznetzov V. N. Bezopasnost’ social’naja [Social Security]. Sociologichesky slovar’. Ed. by G. V. Osipov, L. N. Moskvichiov. Moscow, Norma, 2008. 608 p. Modernizacija Rossii: social’no-gumanitarnye izmerenija [Modernization of Russia: Social and Humanitarian Dimension]. Ed. by N. Y. Petrakov. Moscow, Saint-Petersburg, Nestor-Istorija, 2011. 448 p. Predprijatija udovletvoreny moschnostiami i prodazhami [Enterprises are Satisfied with Facilities and Sales]. Expert, 2016, no 42. С. 72. Rimsky V. L. Rynochnaja racional’nost’ i social’ny poriadok [Market Rationality and Social Order]. Grazhdanskoe i politicheskoe v rossijskih obschestvennykh praktikah. Ed. by S. V. Patrushev. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2013, pp. 85–92. Rossiyskoe obschestvo i vyzovy vremeni [Russian Society and Time Challenges]. Vol 3. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov , N. E. Tikhonova . Moscow, Ves Mir, 2016. 424 p. Social’naja bezopasnost’ Rossii v uslovijah informacionnoy real’nosti [Social Security of Russia in the Conditions of Informational Reality]. Moscow, RUSAYNS, 2016. 156 p. Sredny klass v sovremennoy Rossii. Opyt mnogoletnih issledovaniy [The Middle Class in Contemporary Russia. The Experience of long-term Research]. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, N. E.Tikhonova. Moscow, Ves’ Mir, 2016. 368 p. Teorija i metodologija issledovaniy social’nykh problem [Theory and Methodology of Social Problems Research]. Ed. by R. S. Grinberg, T. V. Chubarova. Moscow, Nauka, 2005. 189 p. Zinchenko N. I. Social’noe izmerenie bezopasnosti Rossii [Social Dimension of Russia’s Security]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, 2007, no 2, pp. 137–140.Content Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2016. Vol. 7. No. 4