Research ArticleОлег О Кармадонов, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, associate of other organizaiton, , Doctor of philosophical sciences, Professor of the department f Public Administration, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, Russia.mailto: karmado@yandex.ruГалина Г Ковригина, Candidate of Philosophy associate of other organizaiton, , Candidate of philosophical sciences, senior teacher, Irkutsk National Research Technical University, Irkutsk, Russia.mailto: societal@yandex.ruThe resource aspects of social conjunction. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2016. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 12-28This Article is downloaded: 230 times Topic: Consolidation of the societyFor citation: Кармадонов О. А., Ковригина Г. Д. The resource aspects of social conjunction. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2016. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 12-28DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2016.17.2.394 Текст статьиAbstractThis article is dedicated to the issue of perfecting the theoretic-methodological and analytical tools used to examine matters of social consolidation, social integration, social solidarity and unity. Emphasized is how the phenomena of consolidation and social reproduction are conjugated, with the latter being a natural result of the former. Social reproduction refers to reproducing the social fabric of a community, i.e. historic and socio-cultural continuity. Described is a streaming model of social consolidation, assuming the presence of horizontal and vertical vectors of social integration, while the peculiarities of each “stream” are characterized in terms of their dynamics and comprehensiveness. A characteristic is given and conditions are outlined for the emergence of such phenomena as an “inertial state” and an “inertial society”. It is proven that all processes associated with the creation of a unified, consolidated society can be described using categories of the social conjunction conception, which provides the analytical tools needed to examine social solidarity issues both in their theoretical and applied aspects. Also emphasized is the fact that said conception must be broadened by including such categories into its analytical toolset as “conjunctive resources”, which in itself is a system of social practices within one field of society or another (including the socio-cultural field), which possess a positive potential for its consolidation. It is argued that conjunctive resources specifically associated with the socio-cultural field are of particular importance to social reproduction, especially such components like civilization and space, civic activism, state policy and symbolic systems. Taken into consideration is the fact that within each field of social relations “conjunctive effects” can be registered, referring to the results of consolidation practices, as well as “disjunctive risks”, them being a threat created by certain destructive practices, and finally “perspective conjunctions”, referring to overdue but yet to be activated initiatives, which are formed based upon a combination of several different practices and which are oriented towards achieving a potential conjunctive effect. A single conjunctive code, or an ideology as a symbolic outlook system which integrates a society, acts as the most generalized result of a series of particular conjunctions.Keywordssocial consolidation, social reproduction, streaming model, social conjunction, conjunctive resourcesReferencesAvraamova E. M. Vosproizvodstvo adaptacionnykh praktik v period rossiyskoy transformacii [Reproduction of Adaptation Practices during Russia's Transformation]. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 2005, no 6, pp. 5–15. Beliaeva L. A. Social'nye resursy naselenija v Rossii i Evrope: sravnitelny analiz [Social Resources of the Population in Russia and Europe: A Comparative Analysis]. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 2010, no 3, pp. 23–36. Belkov P. L. Etnos i mifologija. Elementarnye struktury etnografii [Ethnicity and mythology. Elementary structures of Ethnography]. Saint-Petersburg, Nauka, 2009. 280 p. Brodsky A. I. Konjunkcii i otricanija [Conjunctions and Abnegations]. Zvezda, 2007, no 2, pp. 160–170. Danilova E. N., Yadov V. A. Nestabil'naja social'naja identichnost' kak norma sovremennykh obschestv [Unstable Social Identity as a Norm of Modern Societies]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, 2004, no 10, pp. 27–30. Dutchak E. E., Kashpur V. V. «Russky sibiriak», ili Paradoksy regional'noy identifikacii [Russian “sibiriack» (Siberian Man) or Paradoxes of Regional Identity]. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost, 2013, no 4, pp. 116–129. Fedotova V. G. Apatija na Zapade i v Rossii [Adaptation in the West and in Russia]. Voprosy philosofii, 2005, no 3, pp. 3–19. Holmes S. When Less State Means Less Freedom. Transitions. 1997. Vol. 4, pp. 66–75. Jung K. G. Psihologija perenosa [Transfer Philosophy]. Moscow, Refl-buk, Vakler, 1997. 298 p. Kapicyn V. M.. Simvoly nacional'noy identichnosti kak resurs soft power [Symbols of National Identity as a Resource of Soft Power]. DISKURS-PI. 2014. Vol. 11, no 1, pp. 113–118. Karmadonov O. A. Sociologicheskaja racional'nost' otsutstvija v issledovanii sovremennogo mira [Sociological Rationality of Absence in the Study of the Modern World]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, 2008, no 3, pp. 3–12. Karmadonov O. A. Solidarnost', integracija, konjunkcija [Solidarity, Integration, Conjunction]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, 2015, no 2, pp. 3–12. Karmadonov O. A., Zverev M. K. Konsolidacija rossiyskogo obschestva: potoki i pregrady [Consolidation of Russian Society: the Flows and Barriers]. Irkutsk: ISU, 2012. 223 p. Kovalisko N. Dominantnaja konjunkcija v izuchenii stratifikacionnykh poriadkov: pozicii & dispozicii [Dominant Conjunction in Studying the Stratification Order: Position & Disposition]. Sociologija: teorija, metody, marketing, 2010, no 1, pp. 125–137. Kovrigina G. D. Social'noe vosproizvodstvo sovremennogo rossiyskogo obschestva v aspekte problem social'noy konsolidacii. Problemy social'nogo vosproizvodstva sovremennogo rossiyskogo obschestva: politicheskie, ekonomicheskie,kul'turnye i demograficheskie aspekty [Social Reproduction of Contemporary Russian Society in the Aspect of Social Consolidation Problems]. Irkutsk, ISU, 2014, pp. 241–246. Levin K. Dinamicheskaja psihologija [Dynamic Philosophy]. Moscow, Smysl, 2001. 578 p. Moskvin L. B. Dialog, doverie i soglasie – vazhneyshie nematerial'nye resursy razvitija Rossii [Dialogue, Trust and Harmony - the most Important Immaterial Resources of Russia]. Social'no-gumanitarnye znanija, 2014, no 3, pp. 38–55. Muzdybaev K. Strategija sovladanija s zhiznennymi trudnostjami. Teoretichesky analiz [Coping Strategy with Life's Difficulties. Theoretical Analysis]. Zhurnal sociologii i social'noy antropologii, 1998, vol. 1, no 2, pp. 39–52. Nemirovsky V. G. Rossiysky krizis v zerkale postneklassicheskoy sociologii [The Russian Crisis in a Mirror of Postnonclassical Sociology]. Moscow, «LIBROKOM» Book House, 2009. 200 p. Sharipova R. H. Social'naja identifikacija rossiyskih i kitayskih studentov [Social Identification of Russian and Chinese Students]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, 2012, no 8, pp. 143–146. Shurygina I. I. Kul'turnye resursy i kul'turny capital «novykh bednykh» [Cultural Resources and Cultural Capital of “New Paupers”]. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 2001, no 5, pp. 163–172. Vassiliev L. S. Istorija religiy Vostoka [History of Religions of the East]. Moscow, Knizhny dom «Universitet», 2000. 426 p. Yadov V. A. Social'nye i social'no-psihologicheskie mehanizmy formirovanija social'noy identichnosti lichnosti [Social and Socio-psychological Mechanisms of Formation of the Social Identity of the Person]. Mir Rossii, 1995, no 3–4, pp. 158–181.Content Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2016. Vol. 7. No. 2