In the article, on the basis of various approaches to the interpretation of the concept of “social and cultural”, its analytical potential is revealed. The main sources of information for revealing the focus of the author’s interpretations of the concept analyzed were the articles from the “Sociological Research” magazine, in which the term “social and cultural” appeared. The category “social and cultural” is adequate to Russian history, culture, sociality and is used in undivided form much more often than in Western works. However, the inseparability of the social and the cultural in this category has weaknesses, since it complicates the possibilities of operationalization and inclusion in the sociological toolkit. In many cases in the sociological works of the post-Soviet period, this concept is not accompanied by an interpretation of the meaning of the social and cultural, but is used as an indication of the fundamental nature of a social phenomenon or a process conditioned by cultural traditions. The analysis of the meanings implied by the authors in the category under study made it possible to distinguish eight different interpretations: reduction of the social and cultural to other fundamental concepts, such as mentality, cultural codes, archetypes, etc.; his interpretation on the basis of culturology, in which the social is the derivative function of the cultural; interpretation of the sociocultural as everything that is connected with the spiritual aspects of economic activity on the basis of M. Weber’s approach; interpretation based on the approach of P. Sorokin, in which the social and the cultural are inseparable; interpretation based on the paradigm of structural functionalism; interpretation based on the approach of A. Akhiezer, which examines inconsistency of sociocultural approaches as their attributive characteristic; maximally broad interpretation of the social and cultural, including all sociomaterial, socio-demographic and sociopsychological trends; interpretation of the social and cultural as a latent property of social systems or institutions, that is, anything that goes beyond the direct functions of the social system. On the basis of this analysis, it is proposed to consider the contradictions between social and cultural manifestations as the leading fundamental attributive characteristic of the social and cultural (processes, phenomena, etc.). Specific aspects of the social and the cultural that form the dual oppositions are singled out, suitable for development of the sociological measuring instrument.

sociocultural, social, cultural, dual oppositions

 1. Sorokin P. A. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Human being. Civilization. Society]. Moscow, Izd-vo Politicheskoy literatury, 1992 (in Russ.).

 2. Bogdanov A. L., Provotorov V. A. Kinoteatr kak sotsiokulʹturnyy poligon dosuga [Cinema as a sociocultural leisure ground]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1995, no 3 (in Russ.).

 3. Karpukhin O. I. Samootsenki molodyozhi kak indikator eyo sotsiokulʹturnoy identifikatsii [Self-esteem of youth as an indicator of its sociocultural identity]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1998, no 12 (in Russ.).

 4. Rybakova M. V. Sotsiokulʹturnye aspekty izucheniya adaptatsii k klimaticheskim izmeneniyam [Sociocultural aspects of the study of adaptation to climate change]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2010, no 5 (in Russ.).

 5. Shabaev Yu. P., Sadokhin A. P., Shilov N. V. Ehtnonatsionalʹnye dvizheniya v novoy sotsiokulʹturnoy realʹnosti [Ethnonational movements in the new sociocultural reality]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2009, no 10 (in Russ.).

 6. Toshchenko Zh. T. K chitatelyu [To the reader]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2011, no 1.

 7. Byzov L. G. Sotsiokulʹturnaya transformatsiya rossiyskogo obshchestva i formirovanie neokonservativnoy identichnosti [Sociocultural transformation of Russian society and the formation of a neoconservative identity]. Mir Rossii, 2002, no 1 (in Russ.).

 8. Sarno A. A. Podderzhka i regulirovanie motivatsionnykh protsessov v sfere trudovykh otnosheniy [Support and regulation of motivational processes in the sphere of labor relations]. Saint Petersburg, 1997 (in Russ.).

 9. Obshchaya sotsiologiya. Uchebnoe posobie [General sociology. Tutorial]. General ed. by A. G. Ehffendiev. Moscow, INFRA-M, 2004 (in Russ.).

 10. Kolesin I. D. Podkhody k izucheniyu sotsiokulʹturnykh protsessov [Approaches to the sociocultural processes research]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1999, no 1 (in Russ.).

 11. Tabatadze I. A. Sotsiokulʹturnye aspekty turisticheskoy deyatelʹnosti [Sociocultural aspects of tourism]. Doklady Vtoromu Vserossiyskomu kongressu, vol. 1. Moscow, 2004 (in Russ.).

 12. Gofman A. B. Sotsialʹnoe – kulʹturnoe – kulʹturnoe. Istoriko-sotsiologicheskie zametki o sootnoshenii ponyatiy «obshchestvo» i «kulʹtura» [Social – cultural – cultural. Historical and sociological notes on the relationship between the concepts of "society" and "culture"] Sotsiologicheskiy ezhegodnik 2010. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Moscow, INION RAN; NIU–VSHE, 2010 (in Russ.).

 13. Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works]. Moscow, Progress, 1990 (in Russ.).

 14. Zarubina N. N. Sotsialʹno-kulʹturnye osnovy khozyaystva i predprinimatelʹstva [Sociocultural foundations of economy and entrepreneurship]. Moscow, ICHP «Izdatelʹstvo Magistr», 1998.

 15. Zarubina N. N. Denʹgi kak sotsiokulʹturnyy fenomen: predely funktsionalʹnosti [Money as a sociocultural phenomenon: limits of functionality]. 2005, no 7 (in Russ.).

 16. Sorokin P. A. Sotsialʹnaya i kulʹturnaya dinamika [Social and cultural dynamics]. Saint Petersburg, Izd-vo Russkogo Khristianskogo gumanitarnogo Instituta, 2000 (in Russ.).

 17. Parsons T. O sotsialʹnykh sistemakh [About social systems]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt, 2002 (in Russ.).

 18. Lapin N. I. Sotsiokulʹturnyy podkhod i sotsietalʹno- funktsionalʹnye struktury [Sociocultural approach and societal-functional structures]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2000, no 7 (in Russ.).

 19. Akhiezer A. S. Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opyta. Ot proshlogo k budushchemu [Russia: Criticism of historical experience. From the past to the future]. Novosibirsk, 1997, vol. 1 (in Russ.).

 20. Akhiezer A. S. Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opyta. Teoriya i metodologiya. Slovarʹ [Russia: Criticism of historical experience. Theory and methodology. Dictionary]. Novosibirsk, 1998, vol. 2 (in Russ.).

 21. Chubarʹyan A. O. Sovremennye tendentsii sotsialʹnoy istorii [Modern trends in social history]. Sotsialʹnaya istoriya. Ezhegodnik. Moscow, 1997 (in Russ.).

 22. Zakharov N. L. Sotsiokulʹturnye i professionalʹnye regulyatory povedeniya rossiyskogo chinovnika [Sociocultural and professional behavior regulators of the Russian official]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2004, no 3 (in Russ.).

 23. Zheleznyakova S. I. Sotsiokulʹturnye orientatsii uchiteley [Sociocultural orientations of teachers]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2001, no 4 (in Russ.).

 24. Oreshkin D. B. Nado vyyti iz sotsiokulʹturnogo chuma. Ehlektronnoe izdanie [We must get out of the sociocultural plague]. 2010. URL: http://www.ryzkov.ru/ print_new.php?id=10543 [date of visit: 25.11.2011] (in Russ.).

 25. Bazovye tsennosti rossiyan: sotsialʹnye ustanovki, zhiznennye strategii, simvoly, mify [Basic values of Russians: social attitudes, life strategies, symbols, myths]. Responsible ed. Ryabov A. V., Kurbangaleeva E. Sh. Moscow, Dom intellektualʹnoy knigi, 2003 (in Russ.).

 26. Levchenko I. E. Tsenzura kak sotsiokulʹturnyy fenomen [Censorship as a sociocultural phenomenon]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1996, no 8 (in Russ.).

 27. Kravchenko A. I. «Klassiki sotsiologii menedzhmenta» [Classics of Management Sociology]. Saint Petersburg, RKHGI, 1998 (in Russ.).

 28. Toshchenko Zh. T. Antinomiya – novaya kharakteristika obshchestvennogo soznaniya v sovremennoy Rossii [Antinomy is a new characteristic of social consciousness in modern Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2010, no 12 (in Russ.).

 29. Vishnevskiy Yu. R., Shapko V. T. Student 90-kh: sotsiokulʹturnaya dinamika [Student of the 90s: sociocultural dynamics]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2000, no 12 (in Russ.).

 30. Tsukerman V. S. Sotsiokulʹturnye predpochteniya v Chelyabinskoy oblasti [Sociocultural preferences in the Chelyabinsk region]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1997, no 10 (in Russ.).

 31. Korobkov Yu. D. Sotsiokulʹturnyy oblik rabochikh gornozavodskogo Urala (vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo XX veka) [Sociocultural appearance of the workers of the mining Urals (second half of the XIX – beginning of the XX century)]. Moscow, Izd-vo «Slovo», 2003 (in Russ.).

 32. Artemov V. M. Sotsialʹno-kulʹturnaya orientatsiya pravookhranitelʹnykh organov [The social-cultural orientation of law enforcement agencies]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2000, no 1 (in Russ.).

 33. Sivolapov A. V. K novoy modeli obucheniya: sotsiokulʹturnyy podkhod [Towards a new model of learning: a sociocultural approach]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1994, no 3 (in Russ.).

 34. Tyugashev E. A. Sotsiokulʹturnyy podkhod v prepodavanii sotsiologii: zhanr ehtyuda [Sociocultural approach in the teaching of sociology: the genre of etude]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1997, no 5.

 35. Yakovenko I. G. Riski sotsialʹnoy transformatsii rossiyskogo obshchestva: kulʹturologicheskiy aspekt [Risks of social transformation of Russian society: the culturological aspect]. Moscow, Progress- Traditsiya, 2006 (in Russ.).

 36. Kordonskiy S. G. Soslovnaya struktura postsovetskoy Rossii [Class structure of post-Soviet Russia]. Moscow Fond «Obshchestvennoe mnenie», 2008 (in Russ.).

 37. Kara-Murza S. G. Gosudarstvennyy paternalizm – tsivilizatsionnoe izmerenie [State paternalism is a civilizational dimension]. URL: http://www.orossii.ru/content/ view/170 [date of visit: 25.11.2011] (in Russ.).

 38. Popova I. M. «Sotsialʹnostʹ» kak osnovanie sotsiologicheskoy interpretatsii ["Sociality" as the basis of sociological interpretation]. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing, 2002, no 4 (in Russ.).

 39. Toshchenko Zh. T. Paradoksalʹnyy chelovek [The paradoxical man]. Moscow, Gardariki, 2001 (in Russ.).

 40. Oboronnye predpriyatiya Rossii: 1995‑2001 gg. [Defense Enterprises of Russia: 1995–2001]. Moscow, 2002 (in Russ.).

 41. Lavalʹ K. Chelovek ehkonomicheskiy. Ehsse o proiskhozhdenii neoliberalizma [An economic man. The essay on the origin of neoliberalism]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2010 (in Russ.).

 42. Temnitskiy A. L. Dilemmy individualizma – kollektivizma i paternalizma – partnyorstva v sfere trudovykh otnosheniy [Dilemmas of individualism – collectivism and paternalism – partnerships in the sphere of labor relations]. Transformatsiya ehkonomicheskikh institutov v postsovetskoy Rossii (mikroehkonomicheskiy analiz). Ed. by R. M. Nureev. Moscow, 2000 (in Russ.).

 43. Temnitskiy A. L. Sovetskie i postsovetskie orientatsii rabochikh v trudovom povedenii v 1990-e gody [Soviet and post-Soviet orientations of workers in labor behavior in the 1990s]. Obshchestvo i sotsiologiya: novye realii i novye idei. Trudy Pervogo Vserossiyskogo sotsiologicheskogo kongressa. Saint Petersburg, Sotsiologicheskoe obshchestvo im. M. M. Kovalevskogo, 2002 (in Russ.).

 44. Temnitskiy A. L. Orientatsii rabochikh na paternalistskie i partnerskie otnosheniya s rukovodstvom [Orientations of workers to paternalistic and partnership relations with management]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2004, no 6 (in Russ.).

 45. Temnitskiy A. L. Traditsii i innovatsii v trudovoy kulʹture rossiyskikh rabochikh [Traditions and Innovations in the Labor Culture of Russian Workers]. Traditsii i innovatsii v sovremennoy Rossii. Sotsiologicheskiy analiz vzaimodeystviya i dinamiki. Ed. by A. B. Gofman. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2008 (in Russ.).

 46. Temnitskiy A. L. Sotsiokulʹturnye proyavleniya i proryvy traditsii paternalizma v trudovoy srede rabochikh Rossii [Sociocultural manifestations and breakthrough of the tradition of paternalism in the working milieu of the workers of Russia]. Rabochie – predprinimateli – vlastʹ v kontse XIX – nachale XX v.: sotsialʹnye aspekty problemy. Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii. Responsible ed., compiled A. M. Belov. In 2 parts. Kostroma, KGU im. N. A. Nekrasova. 2010. Part. I (in Russ.).