The article examines the question of what functional and symbolic components are embedded in the attitude towards owning a personal vehicle and what the factors are of Russians' commitment to owning a car. The key question of the study: is it currently possible to transition from the "cult of the automobile" in Russia to other forms of transport behaviour of Russian residents? The author's study is based on the foundations of actor-network theory and the theory of structural functionalism.

The author assumes that the attitude towards owning a car remains strong and believes that it consists of certain functional and semantic parameters. The author tries to determine the reasons for the rootedness of this attitude and discusses possible ways of its transformation. The results of several waves of the all-Russian omnibus telephone survey "SPUTNIK" VTsIOM (2018-2024) are used as an empirical basis for the study. The survey method is a telephone interview with a stratified random sample extracted from the full list of mobile phone numbers used in the territory of the Russian Federation. The study involved 1,600 Russians aged 18 years and older. The results obtained are based on the analysis of one-dimensional and two-dimensional distributions of features, as well as the calculation and interpretation of the correlation coefficients.

The author comes to the conclusion about the high level of motorisation in the Russian Federation, where the majority of the population has experience of driving and purchasing a personal car, and the number of households without a car is decreasing annually. The use of cars is becoming more intensive, and therefore it is becoming impossible for the majority of Russians to imagine their life without one. Socio-demographic characteristics of individuals only slightly affect their commitment to a car, and the true reasons for the impossibility of giving it up are hidden in the attitude towards car ownership, that consists of the functionality of the car and its semantic images. A car is an integral attribute of life for most citizens, giving them the opportunity to experience a variety of emotions and sensations, as well as maintain the desired level of well-being. The author comes to the conclusion that it is impossible to overcome the “cult of the automobile” in Russia at the current moment.

urban mobility, transport behavior, car ownership, mindset to own a private car

1.  Bakaeva Eh.P. Visualizing identity: Kalmyk number plates and the symbolism of the ethnic. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya, 2020: 4: 326–364 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17223/2312461X/30/15; EDN: YORXIT.
2. Veselkova N. V., Vandyshev M. N. et alEveryday Mobility of Youth in Small Ural Cities. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologia, 2019: 20(4): 78–113 (in Russ.). EDN: WPUFWL.
3. Volkov V. N. Cars literally flooded all. Kul'turnoe nasledie Rossii, 2015: 4: 9–15 (in Russ.). EDN: VJZAXB.
4. Kononenko R. V. Stylistic features of automobile consumption: objective and subjective aspects. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo un-ta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Ser.: Social'nye nauki, 2010: 1: 27–34 (in Russ.). EDN: MTJLCL.
5. Krupa T. A. Regional aspects of social and cultural problems of motorization of the urban environment (on materials of Primorsky Krai). ISOM, 2016: 3-2: 111–120 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17748/2075-9908-2016-8-3/2-111-120; EDN: WHARMV.
6. Medvedev A. V., Medvedev R. A. Limitation of the use of personal vehicles in favor of public: the opinion of Russians. Sotsiologia, 2022: 4: 119–127 (in Russ.). EDN: KSGWJF.
7. Muleev E. Y. "Travel behaviour", "Motility", "Mobility": revisited the conceptualization of terms. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 2015: 21(3): 8–28 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2015.21.3.2375; EDN: UKAKEP.
8. Ovruckij A. V. Potreblenie kak funkciya kul'tury [Consumption as a function of culture]. Izvestiya Bajkal'skogo gosun-ta, 2011: 5: 220–225 (in Russ.). EDN: OIGINZ.
9. Rudenko N. Competing for the future: problematization of the -contemporary system of automobility in public discourse by Yandex self-driving group. Laboratorium, 2022: 2: 73–102 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25285/2078-1938-2022-14-2-73-101; EDN: PUHWZN.
10. Saveleva Ye. O. The changing of population transport behavior as a way to achieve sustainable mobility in Russian cities. Vestnik PermNIPU. Prikladnaya ekologiya. Urbanistika, 2021: 41(1): 5–18 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15593/2409-5125/2021.01.01; EDN: NHPBNB.
11. Saveleva E. O. The factors of transportation behavior in the major cities of Russia. Gradostroitel'stvo, 2018: 57(5): 54-62 (in Russ.). EDN IIVGDL.
12. Sorokina N. V., Alipov D. V. The Means of Transport and Status Mobility: the Car in the Socio-Cultural Perspective. Zhurnal sociologii i social'noj antropologii, 2013: 16(3): 210–215 (in Russ.). EDN: RODCHV.
13. Urri D. Mobilities. Moscow,Praksis, 2012: 576 (in Russ.).
14. Cairns S. et al. Sociological perspectives on travel and mobilities: A review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014: 63: 107–117.
15. Carrabine E., Longhurst B. Consuming the Car: Anticipation, Use and Meaning in Contemporary Youth Culture.  The Sociological Review, 2002: 50(2): 181–196. DOI: 10.1111/1467-954X.00362.
16. Clark W., Wang W. The Automobile, Immigrants, and Poverty: Implications for Immigrant Earnings and Job Access. Urban Geography, 2010: 31(4): 523–540. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.31.4.523.
17. Cohen M. J. The future of automobile society: a socio-technical transitions perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2012: 24(4): 377–390. DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2012.663962.
18. Dant T. The Driver-car. Theory, Culture & Society, 2004: 21(4-5): 61–79. DOI: 10.1177/0263276404046061.
19. Deka D. Transit Availability and Automobile Ownership. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2002: 21(3): 285–300. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0202100306.
20. Gunn S. People and the car: the expansion of automobility in urban Britain, c.1955–70. Social History, 2013: 38(2): 220–237. DOI: 10.1080/03071022.2013.790139.
21. Joo J. The Impact of the Automobile and its Culture in the U.S. International Area Studies Review, 2007: 10(1): 39–54. DOI: 10.1177/223386590701000103.
22. Kent J. Still Feeling the Car – The Role of Comfort in Sustaining Private Car Use. Mobilities, 2015: 10(5): 726–747. DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2014.944400.
23. Ong P. Car Ownership and Welfare-to-Work. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2001: 21: 239–252. DOI: 10.1002/pam.10025.
24. Sheller M., Urry J. The City and the Car. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2000: 24(4): 737–757. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00276.
25. Urry J. Inhabiting the Car. The Sociological Review, 2006: 54(1): 17–31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00635.x.