This article examines the development of the scientific mentoring institute in Russian universities. The authors assume that it should be based on scientific ideas about the content and features of the professional roles of a scientific supervisor and a scientific mentor. Despite all the similarities, these roles of research and teaching staff correspond to different functional areas of their activities with their own set of tasks, results, and features of interaction with students. The purpose of this article is to compare the professional roles of a scientific mentor and a scientific supervisor of undergraduate and graduate students for the purpose of updating the meaning of mentoring activities in the field of university research work. The subject of the analysis is the features of the professional role of a student's scientific mentor. Their presence substantiates the independent nature of mentoring activities and "legitimises" it in the role repertoire of research and teaching staff of universities. The empirical basis of the article is the materials of semi-structured interviews with research and teaching staff of Russian universities, conducted within the framework of an all-Russian study (n = 30, 2024). The interpretation of the empirical data is based on the theoretical provisions of the sociological theory of roles, the theory of social identity, the concept of professional morality and ethics. The study not only substantiates the differences in the functional content of professional roles and everyday practices of a supervisor and a mentor, but also reveals the paradoxes of the professional identification of supervisors and mentors, the moral and ethical dimension of their activities. It is shown that the features of the prescriptions, expectations and performance of their roles by supervisors and mentors are manifested in the degree of formality of their rights, duties and responsibilities, the level of individualisation and the nature of the temporal organisation of interactions with students. The practical significance of the results obtained is associated with the possibility of developing university programs to support mentors as key actors in involving students in the academic profession and university science. The role differences between a scientific mentor and a scientific supervisor allow us to further specify the management requirements for different types of professional activity of scientific and pedagogical workers, as well as optimize their resource support. The practical significance of the study for academic workers is to obtain grounds for self-assessment of their readiness for the professional role of a scientific mentor and to determine the areas of professional responsibility associated with this role.

scientific mentoring, scientific supervisor, professional roles, professional identification, professional ethics, research work of students

1. Abramov R. N., Bykov A. V. Professional ethics as an object of sociological research: between the sociology of morality and the sociology of professions. Vestnik RUDN. Sociologiya, 2018: 18 (4): 747–764 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2018-18-4-747-764.
2. Abramov R. N., Gruzdev I. A., Terentyev E. A. Working hours and role tensions of employees of the modern Russian University. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2017: 1: 88–111 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2017-1-88-111; EDN: YHZCSN.
3. Ambarova P. A., Shabrova N. V. Institutional models of scientific mentoring of students of Russian universities: organizational and managerial aspects. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2023: 27(3): 5–16 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2023.03.019; EDN: SYZBBK.
4. Artamonova M. V. Generational conflict: Universities in search of ways out of crisis in a changing world. In Intercultural dialogue and the challenges of modernity: otherness and otherness in one's own and native. Orel, Modul-K, 2019: 396–403 (in Russ.). EDN: KSSNIN.
5. Gorshkov M. K., Sheregi F. E., Tyurina I. O. Reproduction of intellectual labor specialists: a sociological analysis. Moscow, FNISC RAN, 2023: 383 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-413-0.2023; EDN: DMQCRN.
6. Drugova E. A. The nature of the conflict between administrators and scientific and pedagogical workers at Russian universities. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2018: 22(2): 72–82 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2018.02.018; EDN: XOTLSX.
7. Drugova E. A., Andrakhanov A. A. et al. Professional growth of a young scientist: scarce support resources. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2017: 21(2): 144–154 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2017.02.028; EDN: YRORWF.
8. Kon I. S. Sociologiya lichnosti [Sociology of personality]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1967: 383 EDN: SXVMIR.
9. Kochukhova E. S. Academic profession through the eyes of teachers. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2020: 2: 278–302 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2020-2-278-302; EDN: ONLAXW.
10. Mkrtchyan E. R. Reproduction of scientific and pedagogical personnel in Russian universities as a system: state, problems and prospects of functioning. Volgograd, VolIU – f-l RANHiGS, 2018: 304 (in Russ.). EDN: OQIXFM.
11. Mukhortova V. N. Features of the sociological approach to the concept of "professional identity". Socium i vlast', 2015: 3: 9–13 (in Russ.). EDN: UBFNAZ.
12. Nemirovskiy V. G., Nevirko D. D. Sociologija cheloveka: ot klassicheskih k postneklassicheskim podhodam [Human sociology: from classical to post-non-classical approaches]. Moscow, URSS, LKI, 2008: 302 (in Russ.). EDN: QOHVLZ.
13.  Parsons T. O strukture social'nogo dejstvija [On the structure of social action]. Moscow, Academ. proekt, 2002: 880 (in Russ.).
14. Pishik V. I., Gavrilova A. V., Sivrikova N. V. Styles of intergenerational pedagogical interaction between teachers and students of different generational groups. Rossijskij psihologicheskij zhurnal, 2016: 13(3): 245–264 (in Russ.). EDN: XDNJNN.
15. Prokofiev A. V. Scientific guidance and academic mentoring. Vedomosti prikladnoj etiki, 2019: 53: 25–44 (in Russ.). EDN: ZARELZ.
16. Samoreguljacija i prognozirovanie social'nogo povedenija lichnosti: dispozicionnaja koncepcija [Self-regulation and forecasting of social behavior of a personality: a dispositional concept]. Moscow, CSPM, 2013: 376 (in Russ.). EDN: SWYNQU.
17. Ronzhina N. V. Scientific mentoring in the process of formation of universal competence "systemic and critical thinking". Forecasting the professional future of youth in the digital economy. Yekaterinburg, RGPPU, 2020: 126–130 (in Russ.). EDN: IXTFSU.
18. Strogetskaya E. V., Betiger I. B. Student involvement in science in the focus of sociological analysis. Diskurs, 2024: 10(1): 56–72 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32603/2412-8562-2024- 10-1-56-72; EDN: MCMEKD.
19. Fedorov A. A., Ilaltdinova E. Yu., Frolova S V. "The Convention of generations" in the new world of education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2018: 7: 28–39 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-7-28-38; EDN: XUAQOD.
20. Sheremet E. P. Morality of scientists and scientific ethos: revision of concepts and a new approach. Sociologiya nauki i tekhnologij, 2021: 12(3): 110–127 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2079-0910-2021-3-110-127; EDN: IMCCLP.
21. Shuklina E. A., Pevnaya M. V., Shirokova E. A. The adaptive potential of teachers of the "silver age" in the context of the transformation of higher education. Obrazovanie i nauka, 2020: 22(1): 146–169 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-1-146-169; EDN: GPLSHG.
22. Dolgaleva E. Emotional labour of university teachers in the context of academic capitalism: therapeutic ethos and communication norms and practices with students (case study of two universities). Zhurnal issledovanij social'noj politiki, 2024: 22(1): 79–90. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2024-22-1-79-90.
23. Maloshonok N., Terentev E. National barriers to the completion of doctoral programs at Russian universities Vysshee obrazovanie, 2019: 77(2): 195–211. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-018-0267-9; EDN: ZKHPMY.