The article presents an overview of the results of an exploratory empirical study conducted by the author with the purpose of testing the relationship between subjective factors such as emotional intelligence and the Big Five traits with attitudes toward sensitive topics in sociological surveys (using the problem of domestic violence as an example). The topic of domestic violence was chosen because it is actively discussed in the media discourse, but at the same time, it still remains rather a taboo for Russian society. The sensitivity of the questions is determined not only by the topic, but also by the personal context, so emotional intelligence and personality traits were chosen as subjective factors for the study. To measure emotional intelligence, we used the N. Schutte test as a reliable, valid and at the same time not too voluminous tool for a psychological technique, and to identify the traits of the Big Five, we used the technique of M. S. Egorova and O. V. Parshchikova. Some of the questions on domestic violence were taken from surveys by VCIOM (2011, 2019) and FOM (2019), and the author's questions were also added, including a "sincerity scale", according to which the respondent could assess at the end of the questionnaire the degree of his sincerity in answering the questions asked. The subjects were students aged 18-24 (n = 125). There was carried out a comparison of the obtained results with the results of surveys on the topic of domestic violence by VCIOM and FOM for the age group of 18-24 years, as well as a correlation analysis, which revealed the presence of a weak relationship between the indicators of emotional intelligence, extroversion and attitude towards the topic of domestic violence. As a result, a very significant conclusion was obtained that a high level of emotional intelligence is associated with the sincerity of respondents when answering sensitive topics. The article will be of interest primarily to specialists interested in the methodology of sociological research and interdisciplinary research.

domestic violence, sensitive topics, emotional intelligence, Big Five model, sincerity, sociological research

1. Astaficheva E. Yu. Emotional intelligence, success and psychological adaptability to the environment as factors for ensuring the effectiveness of social management. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo un-ta MVD Rossii, 2023: 99(3): 176–183 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.35750/2071-8284-2023-3-176-183. EDN: RPKULS.
2. Bochkova M. N., Meshkova N. V. Emotional intelligence and social interaction: foreign studies. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psihologiya, 2018: 7(2): 49—59 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2018070205; EDN: XZTFTF.
3. Volchenko T. V. Influence of talents personal charactersitics on their voluntary turnover. Vestnik Moskovskogo un-ta. Ser. 6. Ekonomika, 2023: 58(1): 86–109 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-1-5; EDN:KRGJSE.
4. Egorova М., Parshikova О. Validation of the Short Portrait Big Five Questionnaire (BF-10). Psihologicheskie issledovaniya, 2016: 9(45) (in Russ.). DOI: 10.54359/ps.v9i45.492; EDN: WAOVAH.
5. Kazun A. P. The impact of the coronavirus pandemic on domestic violence: review of international research. Zhenshchina v rossijskom obshchestve, 2022: 1: 72—86 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2022.1.6; EDN: KLGQVW.
6. Kazun A. P., Karpushkina A. A. et al. “If He Beats You, It Means He Loves You”? Strategies for Deproblematizing Domestic Violence in the Russian Media. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial'nyye peremeny, 2022: 5: 149–171 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2022.5.2220; EDN: REEIFZ.
7. Kalugin A. Yu., Shchebetenko S. A. et al. Psychometric Properties of the Russian Version of the Big Five Inventory-2. Psihologiya. Zhurnal VSHE, 2021: 18(1): 7–33 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918-2021-1-7-33; EDN: REEIFZ.
8. Kochetova Yu. A., Klimakova M. V. Emotional intelligence and aggression in foreign studies. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psihologiya, 2019: 8(3): 29—36 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2019080303; EDN: AKVAEU.
9. Larina T. I., Starostina A. A. Sociocultural Characteristics of the Domestic Violence Problem in Russia. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika, 2023: 6: 33–39 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24158/spp.2023.6.4; EDN: XBDGUT.
10. Myagkov A. Yu. Sensitive Research: a Trial of Retrospective Analysis and Conceptualizations. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 2023: 29(3): 8–28 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2023.29.3.1; EDN: BKJOVE.
11. Puzanova Z. V., Larina T. I. et al. Personal characteristics of the focus group participants as a factor of the data quality. Vestnik RUDN. Sociologija, 2021: 21 (4): 722–738 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2021-21-4-722-738; EDN: DJEMTE.
12. Puzanova Z. V., Larina T. I., Gudkova Y. A. Diagnostics of the students’ level of conformity (results of the methodological experiment). Vestnik RUDN. Sociologija, 2022: 22(3): 518–530 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2022-22-3-518-530; EDN: VNCLCV.
13. Puzanova Z. V., Larina T. I., Starostina A. A. Perception of fake news by students with different psychological characteristics: Results of the methodological experiment. Vestnik RUDN. Sociologija, 2023: 23(4): 800–811 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2023-23-4-800-811; EDN: IDLUVM.
14. Ryazantsev S. V., Written E. E., Smirnov A. V. The influence of social intelligence on the adaptation of labor migrants in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sibirskij psihologicheskij zhurnal, 2022: 84: 94–110 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17223/17267080/84/5; EDN: KUCQBG.
15. Serbina G. N., Matsuta V. V., Goiko V. L. Analysis of the Relationship Between VK Users’ Psychological Characteristics and Subscriptions to Communities With Deviant Content. Vestnik Tomskogo gosun-ta, 2021: 467: 164–169 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17223/15617793/467/20; EDN: ROUQRX.
16. Sergienko E. A., Khlevnaya E. A. et al. Emotional intelligence test: Method. manual. Moscow, IP RAN, 2019: 178 (in Russ.).
17. Sokolov B. О., Zavadskaya М. А. Socio-Demographic Profiles, Personality Traits, Values, and Attitudes of COVID-Skeptics in Russia. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny, 2021: 6: 410–435 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.1938; EDN: PLQPRG.
18. Tupikova V. A., Gudkova Y. A., Ovchinnikov-Lysenko E. G. Students’ empathy in the context of extremist risks. Vestnik RUDN. Sociologija, 2023: 23 (3): 579–589 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2023-23-3-579-589; EDN: VOSQYG.
19. Ushakova Y. V., Matyugina M. V. The attitude of young people to domestic violence: past experiences and future practices. Vestnik NNGU im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Ser.: Socialnye nauki, 2022: 4(68): 118–125 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.52452/18115942_2022_4_118; EDN: MLRSTI.
20. Goldberg L. R. Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981: 2: 1: 141–165. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216.
21. Grieve R. Mirror mirror: The role of self-monitoring and sincerity in emotional manipulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 2011: 8(51): 981–985.
22. Mayer J. D., Salovey P., Caruso D. R. Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) user's manual. Toronto, Canada, MHS Publishers, 2002.
23. Salovey P., Mayer D. Emotional intelligence // Imagination, Cognition and Personality. 1990: 9: 185–211. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.004.
24. Schutte N. S., Malouff J. M. et al. Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 1998: 25: 167–177. DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00001-4.