Gender asymmetry in the distribution within Russian politics suggests the presence of a "glass ceiling" that does not allow women to fully realise their potential. The article is devoted to the assessment of socio-political activity as social capital that helps women to co-opt into the state governance system and overcome internal restrictions. In world practice, public non-governmental non-profit organisations have come to be viewed as a special segment of the economy - the "third sector”. It plays an increasingly significant role in the development of civil society and influences the political sphere in Russia. The purpose of the study was to assess the third sector as a pool of recruitment to power. Using the method of retrospective biographical analysis of eight hundred successful acting politicians and managers of both sexes, an analysis of their incorporation into the state system was carried out, gender differences between political trajectories were identified. The most effective in structure were all-Russian public organisations with an extensive network of branches throughout the country, which allows them to accumulate social and administrative resources and successfully incorporate their representatives into government bodies. The party lift functions successfully for both sexes. The analysis allows us to conclude that the third sector is a pool of recruitment into the country's political system; vertical mobility has a number of gender differences. For women, the social capital that allows for vertical mobility is a party career, experience in the system of public chambers, participation in the People's Front "For Russia" movement, as well as in professional and charitable NGOs. For them, activity in the public field is an effective way to build a political trajectory to any level of the power pyramid. The business community, through non-profit associations, tries not only to be useful to the state, but also quite successfully uses them to incorporate its members into various branches of government, but this lift operates mainly for men.

third sector, non-profit organizations, politics, gender, social elevators, vertical mobility, recruitment pool, biographical analysis

1. Borodkin F. M. Tretij sektor v gosudarstve blagodenstvija [The third sector in the welfare State]. Mir Rossii. Sociologiya, Etnologiya, 1997: 6(2): 67–116 (in Russ.).
2. Vorozhejkina T. E. Gosudarstvo i obshhestvo v Rossii i Latinskoj Amerike [State and society in Russia and Latin America]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 2001: 6: 22 (in Russ.).
3. Golovko Ju. M. Social elevators and personnel features of the formation of the youth elite in Russia. Etnosocium i mezhnacional'naja kul'tura, 2015: 8(86): 130–134 (in Russ.). EDN: VLDJDR.
4. Gregova E. Ja. Rol' tret'ego sektora v sovremennoj jekonomike [The role of the third sector in the modern economy]. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie, 2008: 1: 127–135 (in Russ.). EDN: JXXBZX.
5. Diligenskij G. G. Sushhestvuet li v Rossii grazhdanskoe obshhestvo? [Is there a civil society in Russia?]. In Pogovorim o grazhdanskom obshhestve [Let's talk about civil society]. Moscow, In-t FOM, 2001: 18 (in Russ.).
6. Duka A. V. Social'naja differenciacija i rekrutirovanie jelit [Social differentiation and elite recruitment]. Politicheskij klass v sovremennom obshhestve [The political class in modern society], Ed. by Gaman-Golutvina O. V. Moscow, ROSSPAN, 2012: 78–107 (in Russ.).
7. Duverger M. Politicheskie partii [Political parties]. Transl. from Fr. by L. A. Zimina. Moscow, Academ. Proekt, 2007: 540 (in Russ.).
8. Evstifeev R. V. Public Chambers of the Subjects of the Russian Federation in the Regonal System of Government: The Main Problems of Functioning and Evaluation of the Efficiency of Work. Nauchnyj rezul'tat. Sociologija i upravlenie, 2018: 4: 4: 87–100 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2018-4-4-0-8; EDN: YWXKQP.
9. Zelenin A. A. Regional'nyj molodezhnyj parlament kak mehanizm social'nogo lifta v sovremennoj rossijskoj politike [Local youth parliament as means of social mobility in modern russian politics]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosun-ta, 2012: 2(50): 85–90 (in Russ.). EDN: OYQVGN.
10. Kalmykova I. Ju. The formation of social elevators for the professional development of youth and the role of public organizations in achieving an effective solution to the problem. Uchenye zapiski, 2018: 2(26): 12–16 (in Russ.). EDN: XRBBPF.
11. Kozlova N. N. Deputy corps of the Central Federal District: gender dimension. Zhenshhina v rossijskom obshhestve, 2016: 4: 58–71 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2016.4.5; EDN: XDEEIH.
12. Kochkina E. The political system of advantages for male citizens in Russia, 1917-2002. In Gender reconstruction of political systems. Ed. by N. Stepanova, E. Kochkina. St. Petersburg, Aleteya, 2004: 477–523 (in Russ.).
13. Lavrov I. A., Kryshtanovskaya O. V. Social mobility and the “Leaders of Russia” competition. Ars Administrandi (Iskusstvo upravlenija), 2023: 15(2): 292–310 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2023-2-292-310; EDN: EFZRVJ.
14. Lapina N. Ju., Chirikova A. E. Zhenshhina vo vlasti v Rossii: kar'ernyj rost i motivacija [A woman in power in Russia: career growth and motivation]. Rossiya i sovremennyj mir, 2010: 1: 53–70 (in Russ.). EDN: LKABHF.
15. Pantin V. I. Transformacija nacional'no-civilizacionnoj identichnosti so-vremennogo rossijskogo obshhestva: problemy i perspektivy [Transformation of the national and civilizational identity of modern Russian society: problems and prospects]. In Poisk nacio-nal'no-civilizacionnoj identichnosti i koncept "osobogo puti" v rossijskom massovom soznanii v kontekste modernizacii [Search for national-civilizational identity and the concept of “special way” in the Russian mass consciousness in the context of modernization]. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2004: 24–40 (in Russ.). EDN: TEVXVL.
16. Petrenko K. V. Obshhestvennye organizacii v Rossii [Public organizations in Russia]. In Pole mnenij. Dajdzhest rezul'tatov issledovanij [Field of Opinion. Digest of research results]. Moscow, 2001: 10 (in Russ.).
17. Prjazhnikova O. N. Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences. Ekonomicheskie i social'nye problemy Rossii, 2022: 3(51): 15–36 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31249/espr/2022.03.01; EDN: PSMLED.
18. Skobelina N. A. Mehanizm vzaimodejstvija gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshhe-stva: Regional'nyj aspect [Mechanism of interaction between the state and civil society: Regional aspect]. Accessed 10.11.2023. URL: http://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Skobelina_RAPN.pdf (in Russ.).
19. Smirnov V. A. Biznes-soobshhestvo kak bassejn rekrutirovanija politicheskoj elity postsovetskoj Litvy [Business community as a recruitment pool for the political elite of post-Soviet Lithuania]. Sravnitel'naja politika, 2013: 3(13): 119–127 (in Russ.). EDN: RTZSMX.
20. Sorokin P. A. Social'naja mobil'nost' [Social mobility]. Moscow, Academia, 2005: 194 (in Russ.).
21. Tarasenko A. V. Concepts of the third sector and civil society in the context of theories of democracy, governance and economic development: Preprint M-36/14. St. Peterburg, EU v SPb., 2014: 32 (in Russ.).
22. Tev D. B. Business as a source of recruitment of the federal administrative and political elite of Russia. In  Power and elites. Vol. 5. Ed. by A. V. Duka. St. Petersburg, Intersocis, 2018: 54–86 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31119/pe.2018.5.3; EDN: VRGOYT.
23. Cherkess K. A. The role of youth non-profit organizations in the formation and development of social elevators in modern Russia. Obshhestvo: sociologija, psihologija, pedagogika, 2020: 11: 45–50 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24158/spp.2020.11.8; EDN: NLMQEN.
24. Shepeleva Ju. L. Political leadership in the modern Russian society: the gender dimension. Gosudarstvennoe i municipal'noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski SKAGS, 2016: 3: 240–245 (in Russ.). EDN: WTPUQR.
25. Jushin M. Molodezhnyj parlamentarizm i formirovanie grazhdanskoj identich-nosti [Youth parliamentarism and the formation of civic identity]. Obozrevatel', 2007: 7: 26–35 (in Russ.). EDN: KZPXTR.
26. Jakobson L. I., Sanovich S. V. Smena modelej rossijskogo tret'ego sektora: faza importozameshhenija [Changing models of the Russian third sector: the phase of import substitution]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 2009: 4: 21–34 (in Russ.). EDN: KNHDZL.
27. Coston J. A Model and Typology of Government-NGO Relations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1998: 27: 3: 358–382.
28. Caysey J. Comparing Nonprofit Sectors Around the World. What Do We Know and How Do We Know It? Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 2016: 6: 3: 187–223. DOI: 10.18666/JNEL-2016-V6-I3-7583.
29. Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and its Rivals, Gellner Ernest, London; Toronto: Hamish Hamilton/Penguin, 1994: 225. DOI: 10.1017/S0829320100004774.
30. Levitt T. The third sector: New tactics for a responsive society. New York: AMACOM, 1973.
31. Gidron B. Third Sector. In  International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. Ed. by H. K. Anheier, S. Toepler. 1^st ed. New York: Springer, 2010: 1151.
32. Salamon L. M., Anheier H. K. Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Non-profit Sector Cross-nationally. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1998: 9: 3. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022058200985.
33. Salamon L. M., Sokolowski S. W., Haddock M. A. Explaining civil society development: A social origins approach, 2017: 1–321. EDN: XOILJO.